Clinical Performance of the Investigational GEM Hemochron® 100 in Populations Ages 18 Years and Older
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
9
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate and verify the clinical accuracy of the Hemochron® MCS 7000 Whole Blood Microcoagulation System; a point-of-care, whole blood Activated Clotting Time (ACT) measurement in comparison with the Hemochron Signature Elite® Whole Blood Microcoagulation System; a 510(k) cleared predicate device. This is a multi-center, prospective method comparison, with data to be analyzed separately from each site as well as combined for all sites.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2017
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 26, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.5 years
March 1, 2017
July 24, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hemochron® MCS 7000 Whole Blood Microcoagulation System ACT measurements (time of whole blood coagulation in seconds) are clinically equivalent to those of the Hemochron Signature Elite® Whole Blood Microcoagulation System
Demonstrate that the Hemochron® MCS 7000 Whole Blood Microcoagulation System Activated Clotting Time (ACT) measurements (time of whole blood coagulation in seconds) are clinically equivalent to those of the Hemochron Signature Elite® Whole Blood Microcoagulation System; a 510(k) cleared predicate device
Therapeutic: 1 day; Normal: 1 day (duration of a single venous blood collection)
Study Arms (2)
Blood coagulation test 1
Therapeutic: Waste blood from heparinized patients undergoing interventional procedures (standard of care) in different clinical settings will be used to conduct coagulation tests using GEM Hemochron 100 during the course of the procedure before ("baseline") and after heparin administration. There is no drug administration or therapeutic intervention in this study. The interventional procedure (described above) is standard of care and all results of blood coagulation testing using GEM Hemochron 100 performed in this study are not used to influence that care.
Blood coagulation test 2
Therapeutic: Waste blood from heparinized patients undergoing interventional procedures (standard of care) in different clinical settings will be used to conduct duplicate coagulation tests using Signature Elite during the course of the procedure before ("baseline") and after heparin administration. There is no drug administration or therapeutic intervention conducted in the course of this study. The interventional procedure (described above) is standard of care. The only difference in standard of care is that the blood coagulation test is run in duplicate.
Interventions
Activated Clotting Time
Eligibility Criteria
The population to be studied consists of subjects who require parenteral anticoagulant therapy with UFH in accordance with the approved label indications for heparin administration. • Therapeutic Group (T): Patients pre-heparin Patients undergoing procedure requiring anticoagulation with UFH
You may qualify if:
- Therapeutic Group
- Patients meeting all of the following criteria will be considered for entry into the study:
- Males and females 18 years or older.
- Patients scheduled for elective or urgent procedures requiring anticoagulation with UFH.
- Patients requiring heparin anticoagulant therapy for any approved indication and being managed and monitored with the ACT test.
You may not qualify if:
- The following criteria define the population of subjects who will not be accepted in the study:
- The subject develops a significant, unexpected, concurrent illness or adverse event before the first whole blood sample is drawn.
- The subject with a hematocrit of less than 20% or greater than 55% since these samples are not recommended for testing due to optical densities outside of the Hemochron instrument levels of detection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Accriva Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Accriva Study Site
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Accriva Study Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Accriva Study Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Accriva Study Site
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912, United States
Accriva Study Site
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States
Accriva Study Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Accriva Study Site
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
Accriva Study Site
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304, United States
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marc Rubinstein, MD
Accriva Diagnostics
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2017
First Posted
March 8, 2017
Study Start
June 8, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share