A Comparison Between Scalp Nerve Block and Scalp Infiltration
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Forty ASA I or II patients, scheduled for aneurysm clipping were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Those patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group B (Scalp nerve block before skin incision n=15), Group I (Scalp infiltration before incision n=15), respectively with 0.75% of ropivacaine, and Group C (the control group, n=15). Opioids were used to control haemodynamic responses.All patients received the same general anesthesia. After intubation, in group B, scalp block was performed by blocking the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital and lesser occipital nerves, and skin along the incision was infiltrated with 0.75% ropivacaine (group I, n = 15), respectively. For group C, there is no treatment. All patients received the same general anesthesia. The depth of anaesthesia was adjusted to maintain a BIS of 40-60. Characteristics of patients were recorded. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded preoperatively, after induction, before skin incision, the moment of incision, after skin incision. Plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10, CRP were measured before surgery, skin incision,after the surgery. Postoperative pain scores (VAS) for 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours after recovery of consciousness were also recorded. Postoperative complications ( nausea, vomiting, infection, and other adverse events) were monitored after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 8, 2017
March 1, 2017
9 months
January 6, 2017
March 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of IL-10 in pg/ml
Change of plasma levels of IL-10
change from baseline IL-10 values at 24 hour hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change of IL-6 in pg/ml
change for baseline IL-6 values at 24 hour hours after surgery
Mean Arterial Pressure in mmHg
baseline, 5 minutes after induction, 2 seconds after skin incision, 2 minutes and 5 minutes after the incision, 2 seconds after skull drilling
Heart Rate in bpm
baseline, 5 minutes after induction, 2 seconds after skin incision, 2 minutes and 5 minutes after the incision, 2 seconds after skull drilling
Postoperative VAS scores
2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours after recovery of consciousness
Study Arms (3)
Block
EXPERIMENTALScalp nerve block with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine before skin incision, n=15
Infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORScalp infiltration with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine before incision, n=15
Control
NO INTERVENTIONthe control group has no treatment, n=15
Interventions
A scalp nerve block involves regional anesthesia to the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, branches of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve; the zygomaticotemporal nerves, terminal branch of division two of the trigeminal nerve; the auriculotemporal nerves, terminal branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve; the greater and lesser occipital nerves. The scalp block is performed bilaterally with 10 solution of 0.75% ropivacaine.
Scalp infiltration before incision. Neurosurgeons infiltrate the planned incision by a 22-gauge needle penetrated deeply to the skin at a 45°angle with 10ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine throughout the entire thickness of the scalp.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Glasgow coma score (GSC) of 15
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status of more than II
- A ruptured cerebral aneurysm and subarachnoid haemorrhage
- A history of allergy to opiates or any other drug used in the study
- Impaired renal, hepatic, or pulmonary function
- Allergic reaction to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xi Yanglead
Study Sites (1)
Zhongnan hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
Related Publications (5)
Leslie K, Troedel S. Does anaesthesia care affect the outcome following craniotomy? J Clin Neurosci. 2002 May;9(3):231-6. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2001.0934. No abstract available.
PMID: 12093125BACKGROUNDQuiney N, Cooper R, Stoneham M, Walters F. Pain after craniotomy. A time for reappraisal? Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Jun;10(3):295-9. doi: 10.1080/02688699650040179.
PMID: 8799542BACKGROUNDPakulski C, Nowicki R, Badowicz B, Bak P, Mikulski K, Wojnarska B. Effect of scalp infiltration with lidocaine on the circulatory response to craniotomy. Med Sci Monit. 2001 Jul-Aug;7(4):725-8.
PMID: 11433201RESULTPinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022.
PMID: 8942596RESULTYang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Peng M. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4.
PMID: 31153358DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mian PENG
Zhongnan Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2017
First Posted
March 8, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share