NCT03073681

Brief Summary

Patients implanted with the ReSTOR 2.5 multifocal IOL in the dominant eye and the ReSTOR 3.0 in the non-dominant eye have overall satisfaction and spectacle independence at least comparable to that with bilateral implantation of the 3.0 add lens. Glare and haloes and other unwanted visual side effects with this mixed combination of lenses is better than with bilateral 3.0 lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2017

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 22, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 22, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 4, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

cataract

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall satisfaction with surgery

    Overall satisfaction with surgery, defined as the percentage of patients who report "top box" (5 out of 5) satisfaction with implantation of a 2.5D add ReSTOR implant in the dominant eye and a 3.0D add ReSTOR implant in the non-dominant eye.

    at least 2 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Historical controls

This group of historical controls makes up patients who have previously undergone cataract surgery with a 3.0 add ReSTOR lens in each eye. This group has already completed a satisfaction questionnaire identical to what will be posed in the 2.5/3.0 add lens group.

2.5 and 3.0 add lenses

This group will have undergone cataract surgery at least 2 months before conducting a questionnaire. Patients enrolled in this group had cataract surgery with a 2.5 add ReSTOR lens in one eye and a 3.0 add lens in the other.

Device: Survey

Interventions

SurveyDEVICE

Patients will complete a survey describing their satisfaction with vision after cataract surgery that was performed at least 2 months prior to study enrollment.

2.5 and 3.0 add lenses

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with healthy eyes and uncomplicated cataract surgery completed at least 2 months before a questionnaire is conducted.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients implanted with either a ReSTOR 2.5 or 3.0 multifocal within 24 months of the survey administration.
  • Patients with otherwise healthy eyes, not exhibiting any significant ocular morbidity that would be expected to influence outcome measures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with visually significant co-morbidities (corneal, retina, optic nerve disease) that could affect their satisfaction with surgery
  • Patients with surgical complications either during or after surgery (capsule tears, iris trauma, decentered IOL, cystoid macular edema, etc.)
  • Patients with previous refractive surgery
  • Patients with ≥ grade 1 posterior capsule opacity at their last visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Harvard Eye Associates

Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fraunfelder FW. Corneal toxicity from topical ocular and systemic medications. Cornea. 2006 Dec;25(10):1133-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000240084.27663.fd.

    PMID: 17172885BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • John Hovanesian, MD

    MDbackline, LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2017

First Posted

March 8, 2017

Study Start

March 3, 2017

Primary Completion

May 22, 2019

Study Completion

May 22, 2019

Last Updated

June 5, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We do not plan to share IPD.

Locations