Satisfaction & Spectacle Independence With ReSTOR 2.5 & ReSTOR 3.0 IOLs
Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence With the ReSTOR 2.5 Combined With the ReSTOR 3.0 IOL in Cataract Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients implanted with the ReSTOR 2.5 multifocal IOL in the dominant eye and the ReSTOR 3.0 in the non-dominant eye have overall satisfaction and spectacle independence at least comparable to that with bilateral implantation of the 3.0 add lens. Glare and haloes and other unwanted visual side effects with this mixed combination of lenses is better than with bilateral 3.0 lenses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 22, 2019
CompletedJune 5, 2019
June 1, 2019
2.2 years
March 3, 2017
June 4, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall satisfaction with surgery
Overall satisfaction with surgery, defined as the percentage of patients who report "top box" (5 out of 5) satisfaction with implantation of a 2.5D add ReSTOR implant in the dominant eye and a 3.0D add ReSTOR implant in the non-dominant eye.
at least 2 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Historical controls
This group of historical controls makes up patients who have previously undergone cataract surgery with a 3.0 add ReSTOR lens in each eye. This group has already completed a satisfaction questionnaire identical to what will be posed in the 2.5/3.0 add lens group.
2.5 and 3.0 add lenses
This group will have undergone cataract surgery at least 2 months before conducting a questionnaire. Patients enrolled in this group had cataract surgery with a 2.5 add ReSTOR lens in one eye and a 3.0 add lens in the other.
Interventions
Patients will complete a survey describing their satisfaction with vision after cataract surgery that was performed at least 2 months prior to study enrollment.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with healthy eyes and uncomplicated cataract surgery completed at least 2 months before a questionnaire is conducted.
You may qualify if:
- Patients implanted with either a ReSTOR 2.5 or 3.0 multifocal within 24 months of the survey administration.
- Patients with otherwise healthy eyes, not exhibiting any significant ocular morbidity that would be expected to influence outcome measures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with visually significant co-morbidities (corneal, retina, optic nerve disease) that could affect their satisfaction with surgery
- Patients with surgical complications either during or after surgery (capsule tears, iris trauma, decentered IOL, cystoid macular edema, etc.)
- Patients with previous refractive surgery
- Patients with ≥ grade 1 posterior capsule opacity at their last visit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MDbackline, LLClead
Study Sites (1)
Harvard Eye Associates
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Related Publications (1)
Fraunfelder FW. Corneal toxicity from topical ocular and systemic medications. Cornea. 2006 Dec;25(10):1133-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000240084.27663.fd.
PMID: 17172885BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Hovanesian, MD
MDbackline, LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2017
First Posted
March 8, 2017
Study Start
March 3, 2017
Primary Completion
May 22, 2019
Study Completion
May 22, 2019
Last Updated
June 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We do not plan to share IPD.