Flap Advancement Techniques in Ridge Augmentation
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement in Partially Edentulous Patients Undergoing Guided Bone Regeneration Using Titanium Mesh: RCT.
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Different augmentation techniques has been proposed to resolve problem of hard and/or soft tissue ridge defects to enable dental implant placement. Guided bone regeneration GBR procedure is considered as an acceptable reliable surgical procedure for localized ridge augmentation. Exposure of the membrane used for the GBR is considered a major disadvantage of this procedure. In order to avoid such complication, various flap advancement techniques have been proposed such as Periosteal releasing incision,Double-Flap Incision,Coronally advanced lingual flap. The study compare between the flap advancement provided by Periosteal releasing incision,versus,Coronally advanced lingual flap in the treatment of class 1 ridge defect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2019
CompletedJuly 29, 2021
July 1, 2021
11 months
January 13, 2017
July 26, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Flap advancement
Using periodontal probe in millimeters.
Intra-operative after flap release by either periosteal releasing incision or lingual flap advancment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Bone width gain
9 month
Postoperative membrane exposure
9 month
Postoperative Pain
2 weeks
Postoperative swelling
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
coronally advanced lingual flap
EXPERIMENTALFull-thickness crestal incision will be made over the edentulous ridge followed by one full-thickness vertical incision on the buccal side. On the buccal side, full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be raised with horizontal incision 1-3 mm in depth performed in the buccal flap. On the lingual side, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated until reaching the mylohyoid line. A band of mylohyoid muscle is inserted into the inner part of the lingual flap approximately 5 mm from the crest in an apical direction. A blunt instrument will be inserted below that connective band, and, with gentle traction in the coronal direction, this muscular insertion should be detached freeing the lingual flap from the mylohyoid.
periosteal releasing incision technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORFull-thickness crestal incision will be made over the edentulous ridge followed by one full-thickness vertical incision on the buccal side and a full thickness flap will be raised. Xenograft and Ti-mesh will be used to augment the defective site then incremental incisions of 1-3 mm into the periosteum and submucosa will be used to advance the muco-periosteal flap. The flap will then be sutured with interrupted sutures.
Interventions
Full-thickness crestal incision will be made over the edentulous ridge followed by one full-thickness vertical incision on the buccal side. On the buccal side, full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be raised with horizontal incision 1-3 mm in depth performed in the buccal flap. On the lingual side, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated until reaching the mylohyoid line. A band of mylohyoid muscle is inserted into the inner part of the lingual flap approximately 5 mm from the crest in an apical direction. A blunt instrument will be inserted below that connective band, and, with gentle traction in the coronal direction, this muscular insertion should be detached freeing the lingual flap from the mylohyoid.
Full-thickness crestal incision will be made over the edentulous ridge followed by one full-thickness vertical incision on the buccal side and a full thickness flap will be raised. Xenograft and Ti-mesh will be used to augment the defective site then incremental incisions of 1-3 mm into the periosteum and submucosa will be used to advance the muco-periosteal flap. The flap will then be sutured with interrupted sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Partially edentulous patients in the mandibular posterior region.
- Patients with healthy systemic conditions.
- Insufficient ridge width (\< 5mm).
- Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part with adequate soft tissue biotype (≥ 2mm).
- No clinical evidence of active periodontal disease or oral infections.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with the results of the study.
- Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.
- Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as smoking, alcoholism or para-functional habits.
- History of bone associated diseases or medication affecting bone metabolism e.g. bisphosphonate treatment.
- History of radiation therapy in the head or neck region.
- Current antitumor chemotherapy.
- Pregnancy.
- Inflammatory and autoimmune diseases of the oral cavity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Rasha Attia
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11563, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Manal M. Hosny, Professor
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hany E. El-Nahas, Assist. Prof
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2017
First Posted
March 7, 2017
Study Start
December 20, 2018
Primary Completion
November 20, 2019
Study Completion
December 20, 2019
Last Updated
July 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share