Intraperitoneal Dexmedetomidine for Post-laparoscopic Appendicectomy Pain Management in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fifty two children of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 8-14 years old, of both gender, with suspected acute appendicitis scheduled for laparoscopic appendicectomy, were included in this study. Patients were randomized into group (B) and group (BD) with a 1:1 allocation ratio.At the end of surgery, and after peritoneal lavage, those patients who were allocated to B group (bupivacaine group; n = 26) received bupivacaine 0.25% intraperitoneally at a dose of 2 mg/kg followed by 5 ml normal saline. However, in group BD (bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine group; n = 26), bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 2mg/kg was instilled intraperitoneally followed by dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg diluted in 5 ml normal saline. In the postoperative period, assessments were made for pain and sedation on awakening in PACU (0 time) and at 2, 4, 6, 12,and 24 h. Abdominal and/or shoulder pain was assessed on the 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation score. Also the occurrence of nausea or vomiting was recorded . The time from extubation to the first administration of pethidine was registered. The consumption of postoperative analgesia was recorded. Side effects of the study drugs were assessed and recorded by the ward nurses for 24h postoperatively. Possible complications such as respiratory depression, allergic reactions, local anaesthetic toxicity,dizziness, , headache, were recorded and managed accordingly. Duration of surgery and length of stay in PACU were noted. Before discharge to home, length of stay in the hospital was recorded and parent's satisfaction was assessed using the 7-point Likert scale
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 1, 2017
February 1, 2017
9 months
February 16, 2017
February 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative abdominal and/or shoulder VAS pain score
assessment of changes in pain scores along different time intervals in the postoperative 24 hours
at the start of postanesthesia care unit (PACU)(0 time), and 2 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 12 Hours, and 24 Hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time of first request of analgesia.
from the start of postanesthesia care unit (PACU time) and up to 8 hours
amount of rescue pethidine consumed
in 24 Hours postoperative
Length of hospital stay
from end of surgery till discharge to home, up to one week
Sedation score
at the start of postanesthesia care unit (PACU)(0 time), and 2 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 12 Hours, and 24 Hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORintraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine 0.25% ( 2mg/kg) after excision of the appendix.
Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine group
EXPERIMENTALintraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine 0.25% ( 2mg/kg) plus dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg after excision of the appendix.
Interventions
intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine 0.25% ( 2mg/kg) after excision of the appendix.
intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine 0.25% ( 2mg/kg) plus dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg after excision of the appendix.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 8-14 years old, of both gender, with suspected acute appendicitis scheduled for laparoscopic appendicectomy.
You may not qualify if:
- The diagnosis of developmental delay, attention deficit disorder, chronic pain, psychiatric illness, previous open abdominal surgery, the presence of a gastrostomy, ventricular-peritoneal shunt or other abdominal prosthesis, immunosuppression, and those allergic to any of the medications.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ali Elnabtity
Jeddah, 21461, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (8)
Witt WP, Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Overview of Hospital Stays for Children in the United States, 2012. 2014 Dec. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Statistical Brief #187. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274247/
PMID: 25695124BACKGROUNDSauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub2.
PMID: 15495014RESULTTomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PMID: 21958060RESULTAlexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79(3):369-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.3.369. No abstract available.
PMID: 9389858RESULTEl-Labban GM, Hokkam EN, El-Labban MA, Morsy K, Saadl S, Heissam KS. Intraincisional vs intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic for controlling early post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain. J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jul;7(3):173-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.83508.
PMID: 22022099RESULTGolubovic S, Golubovic V, Cindric-Stancin M, Tokmadzic VS. Intraperitoneal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with tramadol. Coll Antropol. 2009 Mar;33(1):299-302.
PMID: 19408641RESULTAlbanese AM, Albanese EF, Mino JH, Gomez E, Gomez M, Zandomeni M, Merlo AB. Peritoneal surface area: measurements of 40 structures covered by peritoneum: correlation between total peritoneal surface area and the surface calculated by formulas. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Jun;31(5):369-77. doi: 10.1007/s00276-008-0456-9. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
PMID: 19142561RESULTKahokehr A, Sammour T, Soop M, Hill AG. Intraperitoneal use of local anesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Sep;17(5):637-56. doi: 10.1007/s00534-010-0271-7.
PMID: 20393755RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2017
First Posted
March 1, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share