Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 for Dry Eye Syndrome
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Masked, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®) Model
1 other identifier
interventional
157
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 1, 2026
CompletedMay 1, 2026
October 1, 2019
3 months
February 23, 2017
October 2, 2019
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sign: Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score
The staining was graded with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale. The ocular surface was divided into three regions, including superior, central and inferior region. The following scale was used to grade staining of the each region. Half (0.5) grade increments may be used. The total score of corneal fluorescein staining was calculated as the sum of three regions, the score range is 0 (minimum) to 12 (maximum). None 0 = no staining Trace 1 = occasional Mild 2 = countable Moderate 3 = uncountable, but not confluent Severe 4 = confluent
change from baseline to week 4
Symptom: Ocular Discomfort Score
Ocular discomfort scores was subjectively graded by the subjects according to the following Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale, rating each eye separately, the score range is 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). 0 = no discomfort 1. = intermittent awareness 2. = constant awareness 3. = intermittent discomfort 4. = constant discomfort
change from baseline to week 4
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Tear Film Break-up Time
change from baseline to week 4
Conjunctival Redness
change from baseline to week 4
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)©
change from baseline to week 4
Study Arms (2)
BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active control with BRM421 solution
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe vehicle solution
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be at least 18 years of age;
- Provide written informed consent;
- Have a reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to enrollment;
- Have a history of use of eye drops
You may not qualify if:
- Have any clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that may include active blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), lid margin inflammation or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, and/or in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study parameters;
- Be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1;
- Have worn contact lenses within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the study;
- Have used any eye drops within 2 hours of Visit 1;
- Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months;
- Be a woman of childbearing potential who is not using an acceptable means of birth control; acceptable methods of contraception
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Central Maine Eye Care
Lewiston, Maine, 04240, United States
Andover Eye Associates
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Alin Ning, Associate Director, Product Development Department
- Organization
- BRIM Biotechnology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gail Torkildsen, MD
Andover Eye Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Lonsdale, MD
Central Maine Eye Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2017
First Posted
February 28, 2017
Study Start
February 7, 2017
Primary Completion
May 20, 2017
Study Completion
June 28, 2017
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Results First Posted
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2019-10