Study Stopped
The new pain protocols imposed by the HAS make it difficult to include new patients in the study
Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Oral Morphine Sulfate in the Treatment of Pain in Pediatric Trauma
FINDOL
Non-inferiority of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Oral Morphine Sulfate in the Treatment of Pain in Pediatric Trauma : a Controled Randomized , Single Blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute tramatic pain is one of main reasons for consultation in pediatric emergency departments. To manage pain quickly and effectively must be a primary outcome of the emergency department. However, pediatric emergency department are sometimes criticized for inadequate and delayed initiation analgesia . Indeed, several studies have shown the inadequacy between the intensity of the pain evaluated by the care team and the therapeutic management of it. The ideal analgesic must have a rapid onset of action, have a powerful analgesic effect, have few side effects and can be administered quickly and painlessly. That's why, the main outcome of this study is to assess the non inferiority of a treatment by intranasal Fentanyl vs morphine sulfate (oral use) in children with traumatic pain on arrival to pediatric emergency department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 12, 2019
CompletedDecember 31, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.1 years
January 30, 2017
December 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of the value of the pain feeling
Assessment of the value of the pain feeling measured by visual analogic scale
45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Delay in treatment efficacy
up to 45 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal fentanyl + Oral placebo
EXPERIMENTALAdministration of intranasal fentanyl (1.5µg/kg) and oral placebo in children with acute pain in traumatic context on arrival in emergency pediatric department.
Oral morphine + Intranasal placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdministration of oral morphine (0.4mg/kg) and intranasal placebo in children with acute pain in traumatic context on arrival in emergency pediatric department.
Interventions
Administration of intranasal fentanyl (1.5µg/kg) and Oral placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in children with acute pain in traumatic context on arrival in emergency pediatric department.
Administration of oral morphine (0,4mg/kg) and intranasal placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in children with acute pain in traumatic context on arrival in emergency pediatric department.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged between 4 years old and 15,3 years old
- Acute pain in traumatic context with a suspicion of fracture for patient \<7years old : feeling Pain \>6/10 defined with a face analogue scale and a visual analogic scale (the difference between the scales is not \<10 points)
- For patients \>7 years old : feeling pain \>6 points and defined thanks to a visual analogic scale
- Informed consent form signed by parents
- Beneficiary of an european health protection
You may not qualify if:
- Allergic or non-indication of fentanyl
- Allergic or contraindication of morphine sulfate
- Pre existing peripheral intravenous catheter
- Traumatic brain injury
- Nasal traumatic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University hospital of Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gaël GG GUYON, MD
Montpellier University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 24, 2017
Study Start
May 30, 2017
Primary Completion
July 18, 2018
Study Completion
March 12, 2019
Last Updated
December 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12