Prognostic Potential of Prehospital Biomarkers in TBI Patients
PreTBI III
1 other identifier
observational
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The PreTBI III study aims to investigate the prognostic potential of prehospital and repeated in-hospital S100B, NSE and GFAP measurements as predictors of neurological outcome in patients suffering severe TBI. Knowledge on prehospital S100B, GFAP and NSE levels as predictors of neurological outcome and mortality may underline the potential of a point-of-care analysis. Possibly, the early biomarker levels may contributed to accurate monitoring of biomarker dynamics and hereby support neurosurgeons and anaesthetists in the clinical decision-making regarding treatment and level of care offered to the patient. Hypotheses:
- 1.Prehospital S100B level is a significant predictor of unfavourable neurological outcome (dichotomized disability rating scale (DRS) and glasgow outcome scale extended (GOS-E) measures) in severe TBI patients.
- 2.Prehospital GFAP level is a significant predictor of unfavourable neurological outcome (dichotomized DRS and GOSE measures) in severe TBI patients.
- 3.Prehospital NSE level is a significant predictor of unfavourable neurological outcome (dichotomized DRS and GOSE measures) in severe TBI patients.
- 4.combined panel of prehospital S100B, GFAP and NSE levels is a significant predictor of unfavourable neurological outcome (dichotomized DRS and GOSE measures) in severe TBI patients.
- 5.Unfavourable neurological outcome (dichotomized DRS and GOSE measures) in severe TBI patients can be predicted by dynamics in repeated measurements of S100B, GFAP and NSE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedApril 24, 2019
May 1, 2018
2 years
November 21, 2016
April 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Sensitivity of se-S100B in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
Neurological outcome will be evaluated by a dichotomized glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) as "Favorable (GOSE 5-8)/Unfavorable (GOSE 1-4)
in relation to event within 1 year
Specificity of se-S100B in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
Neurological outcome will be evaluated by a dichotomized glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) as "Favorable (GOSE 5-8)/Unfavorable (GOSE 1-4)
in relation to event within 1 year
Positive predictive value of se-S100B in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
Neurological outcome will be evaluated by a dichotomized glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) as "Favorable (GOSE 5-8)/Unfavorable (GOSE 1-4)
in relation to event within 1 year
Negative predictive value of se-S100B in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
Neurological outcome will be evaluated by a dichotomized glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) as "Favorable (GOSE 5-8)/Unfavorable (GOSE 1-4)
in relation to event within 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Sensitivity of se-GFAP in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
in relation to event within 1 year
Specificity of se-GFAP in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
Positive predictive value of se-GFAP in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
Negative predictive value of se-GFAP in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
Sensitivity of se-NSE in relation to a binary outcome measured by by a yes/no question of "favorable neurological outcome" pick favorable/unfavorable
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (11)
Mortality rates corresponding to se-S100B values
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
Mortality rates corresponding to se-GFAP values
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
Mortality rates corresponding to se-NSE values
in relation to event within 1 year of trauma
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Severe TBI patients
GCS 3-8
Interventions
Blood sampling from peripheral venous catheter routinely inserted in trauma patients during transportation
Eligibility Criteria
All adult patients (≥18 years) suffering isolated head trauma and receiving an ambulance dispatched by the Prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the Central Denmark Region.
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) GCS 3-8 suffering relevant trauma and displaying relevant clinical indices compatible with TBI as evaluated by EMS staff. Patients are considered incompetent due to on-going alteration of mental state.
You may not qualify if:
- \>6 hours elapsed after trauma, unknown time of trauma, multi trauma, known dementia, chronic psychosis or active central nervous system (CNS) pathology.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aarhuslead
- Central Denmark Regioncollaborator
- Aarhus University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region
Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
Biospecimen
Blood samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2016
First Posted
February 23, 2017
Study Start
February 15, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2019
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share