Study Stopped
No patients enrolled. Study withdrawn.
POOLED Red Blood Cells Prepared From Pooling 5 Leukoreduced, Irradiated RBC Units
Pooled RBCs
Phase I Clinical Trial of Pooled Red Blood Cells for Transfusion
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety of pooled red blood cells (RBCs) compared to standard leukoreduced RBC products stored in additive solution. The primary objective is to determine if there is no significant difference in transfusion associated adverse events in POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups. Secondarily to determine if there are no significant differences in new antibody and new positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) formation in the POOLED-RBCs compared to standard RBC product groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedDecember 26, 2019
December 1, 2019
1.2 years
January 13, 2017
December 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quantitation of adverse events
60 day endpoint
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quantitation of RBC alloantibody formation
15 and 30 minutes post-transfusion
Study Arms (2)
Pooled RBCs
EXPERIMENTALTransfusion of an investigational transfusion blood component: POOLED-RBCs Phenotype matched/ compatible for ABO, D, C, E, and K (blood type of pool will be match patient's type), leukoreduced, and irradiated
Standard RBCs
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransfusion of standard transfusion blood component: additive solution leukoreduced, irradiated RBC product Phenotype matched/ compatible for ABO, D, C, E, and K (blood type of pool will be match patient's type)
Interventions
Transfusion of standard pRBCs that are matched for C, E and K
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age\>= 18 years
- Hematology/ oncology or other chronic transfusion dependent patients
- Patients who are in need of transfusion due to low hemoglobin level (\<8 gm/dl)
- Patients who only require one or two transfusion episode of 1-2 RBC units each during 60 day period
- Currently not planning to be pregnant during the study period
You may not qualify if:
- Previously identified alloantibodies (other than to D, C, E and K)
- Positive direct antiglobulin test, currently or within the last year
- Emergency transfusion
- Patients \< 18 years old
- Need for specialized products, such as washed
- Patients involved in other RBC transfusion clinical trial
- Currently or planning to be pregnant within the proposed study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- New York Blood Centerlead
- Westchester Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States
Related Publications (16)
Hendrickson JE, Hillyer CD. Noninfectious serious hazards of transfusion. Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):759-69. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181930a6e.
PMID: 19224780BACKGROUNDTobian AA, Fuller AK, Uglik K, Tisch DJ, Borge PD, Benjamin RJ, Ness PM, King KE. The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME). Transfusion. 2014 Jun;54(6):1523-9; quiz 1522. doi: 10.1111/trf.12498. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24251374BACKGROUNDHess JR; Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Scientific problems in the regulation of red blood cell products. Transfusion. 2012 Aug;52(8):1827-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03511.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
PMID: 22229278BACKGROUNDMarthur A, Stassinopoulos A, Hess JR, Narla M, Shaz BH. Effects of pooling multiple red blood cell units to improve storage. Blood 2012;120:3437
BACKGROUNDMathur A, Chowdhury R, Hillyer CD, Mitchell WB, Shaz BH. Storage characteristics of multiple-donor pooled red blood cells compared to single-donor red blood cell units. Transfusion. 2016 Dec;56(12):2941-2947. doi: 10.1111/trf.13866. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
PMID: 27704557BACKGROUNDLasalle-Williams M, Nuss R, Le T, Cole L, Hassell K, Murphy JR, Ambruso DR. Extended red blood cell antigen matching for transfusions in sickle cell disease: a review of a 14-year experience from a single center (CME). Transfusion. 2011 Aug;51(8):1732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03045.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
PMID: 21332724BACKGROUNDVerduin EP, Brand A, Schonewille H. Is female sex a risk factor for red blood cell alloimmunization after transfusion? A systematic review. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Oct;26(4):342-53, 353.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
PMID: 22244869BACKGROUNDCuster B, Agapova M, Martinez RH. The cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction technology as assessed using a multiple risk reduction model. Transfusion. 2010 Nov;50(11):2461-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02704.x.
PMID: 20497512BACKGROUNDSweeney JD, Kouttab NM, Holme S, Kurtis JD, Cheves TA, Nelson EJ. Prestorage pooled whole-blood-derived leukoreduced platelets stored for seven days, preserve acceptable quality and do not show evidence of a mixed lymphocyte reaction. Transfusion. 2004 Aug;44(8):1212-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03438.x.
PMID: 15265126BACKGROUNDThiele T, Heddle N, Greinacher A. Donor exposures in recipients of pooled platelet concentrates. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):487-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1213383. No abstract available.
PMID: 23363522BACKGROUNDZou S, Stramer SL, Dodd RY. Donor testing and risk: current prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of transfusion-transmissible agents in US allogeneic donations. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Apr;26(2):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
PMID: 21871776BACKGROUNDStramer SL, Notari EP, Krysztof DE, Dodd RY. Hepatitis B virus testing by minipool nucleic acid testing: does it improve blood safety? Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10 Pt 2):2449-58. doi: 10.1111/trf.12213. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
PMID: 23607261BACKGROUNDLevin AE, Williamson PC, Bloch EM, Clifford J, Cyrus S, Shaz BH, Kessler D, Gorlin J, Erwin JL, Krueger NX, Williams GV, Penezina O, Telford SR 4th, Branda JA, Krause PJ, Wormser GP, Schotthoefer AM, Fritsche TR, Busch MP. Serologic screening of United States blood donors for Babesia microti using an investigational enzyme immunoassay. Transfusion. 2016 Jul;56(7):1866-74. doi: 10.1111/trf.13618. Epub 2016 May 25.
PMID: 27224258BACKGROUNDLevin AE, Williamson PC, Erwin JL, Cyrus S, Bloch EM, Shaz BH, Kessler D, Telford SR 3rd, Krause PJ, Wormser GP, Ni X, Wang H, Krueger NX, Caglioti S, Busch MP. Determination of Babesia microti seroprevalence in blood donor populations using an investigational enzyme immunoassay. Transfusion. 2014 Sep;54(9):2237-44. doi: 10.1111/trf.12763. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PMID: 24995863BACKGROUNDTormey CA, Sweeney JD, Champion MH, Pisciotto PT, Snyder EL, Wu Y. Analysis of transfusion reactions associated with prestorage-pooled platelet components. Transfusion. 2009 Jun;49(6):1242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02128.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
PMID: 19389029BACKGROUNDDaurat A, Roger C, Gris J, Daurat G, Feissel M, Le Manach Y, Lefrant J, Muller L. Apheresis platelets are more frequently associated with adverse reactions than pooled platelets both in recipients and in donors: a study from French hemovigilance data. Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6):1295-303. doi: 10.1111/trf.13475. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
PMID: 26814984BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beth Shaz, M.D.
New York Blood Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2017
First Posted
February 17, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
December 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12