NCT03056144

Brief Summary

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are one of the common physical disabilities in childhood. For SMA, progressive muscle weakness and early fatigue hamper the mobility of the sufferers. Osteopenia is common for this population group due to poor bone growth and muscle disuse. As a result, non-traumatic related fractures and bone pain are common. Recently, whole body vibration therapy (WBVT) has been proven to improve bone health and muscle function in healthy adults and post-menopausal women. Among the limited studies on the WBVT for children with muscular dystrophies, promising results have been shown on gross motor function, balance, and muscle strength and the WBVT appears to be safe for children with SMA. The present pilot study is designed to investigate if WBVT is safe and feasible for individuals with SMA and if WBVT can improve muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral density in children with SMA. Convenience samples of 10 individuals with SMA type III will be recruited. The participants will receive the WBVT of 25 Hertz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of 4mm for a session of about 18 minutes, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Assessment will be performed at the baseline and the completion of the intervention to examine the muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral density of the participants. It is anticipated that the outcomes of this pilot study for SMA may show if this intervention is safe, feasible and beneficial for children with SMA type III regarding to muscle function, functional abilities, postural control and bone mineral content and if there may be any related practical issues of this intervention to this population group. The outcomes also provide research evidence to clinicians if this intervention should be recommended to individuals of similar problems.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 12, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 12, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 26, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

November 8, 2016

Results QC Date

January 31, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

spinal muscular atrophytotal body vibrationchildren

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (42)

  • North Star Ambulatory Assessment

    examine the gross motor function of the participants. A summed score will be added from each test item.

    4 weeks

  • 2-minute Walk Test

    assess submaximal exercise capacity by measuring the distance covered in the 2 minutes in metres

    4 weeks

  • Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-static

    assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in static trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control.

    4 weeks

  • Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

    assess functional capacities in the domains of self care, mobility and social function with a summary score in each domain. A dichotomous score will be given to each question in each domain: 0= unable and 1= able. In self care domain, there are 73 questions, i.e. maximal score is 73. In mobility domain, there are 59 questions i.e. maximal score is 59. In social function domain, there are 65 questions i.e. maximal score is 65.

    4 weeks

  • Body Height

    measure height in cm

    4 weeks

  • Body Weight

    measure weight in kilograms

    4 weeks

  • Body Mass Index

    calculated based on body height and weight in terms of kg/m2

    4 weeks

  • Bone Mineral Content of Femur

    Distal femur BMC will be measured in grams

    4 weeks

  • Bone Mineral Content of Whole Body (Excluding Head)

    Whole body (excluding head) BMC will be measured in grams

    4 weeks

  • Areal Bone Mineral Density of Femur

    Areal bone mineral density of femur will be measured in grams/cm2

    4 weeks

  • Areal Bone Mineral Density of Total Body (Excluding Head)

    Areal bone mineral density of total body (excluding head) will be measured in grams/cm2

    4 weeks

  • Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine

    Volumetric bone mineral density of lumbar spine (L2 to L4) in grams/cm3

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Hip Flexion

    measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Hip Flexion

    measure hip flexion in supine using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Hip Extension

    measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Hip Extension

    measure hip extension in prone using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Hip Abduction

    measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Hip Abduction

    measure hip abduction in supine using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Knee Flexion

    measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Knee Flexion

    measure knee flexion in prone using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Knee Extension

    measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Knee Extension

    measure knee extension in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Ankle Dorsiflexion

    measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Ankle Dorsiflexion

    measure ankle dorsiflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Right Ankle Plantarflexion

    measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Range of Left Ankle Plantarflexion

    measure ankle plantarflexion in sitting using goniometer in degrees

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Hip Flexors

    measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Hip Flexors

    measure muscle strength of hip flexors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Hip Extensors

    measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Hip Extensors

    measure muscle strength of hip extensors in prone using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Knee Flexors

    measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Knee Flexors

    measure muscle strength of knee flexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Knee Extensors

    measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Knee Extensors

    measure muscle strength of knee extensors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Hip Abductors

    measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Hip Abductors

    measure muscle strength of hip abductors in supine using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Dorsiflexors

    measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Dorsiflexors

    measure muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Right Ankle Plantarflexors

    measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Muscle Strength of Left Ankle Plantarflexors

    measure muscle strength of ankle plantarflexors in sitting using dynamometer in terms of Newton

    4 weeks

  • Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control_active

    assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in active trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control.

    4 weeks

  • Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control-reactive

    assess the segmental trunk control in sitting position with an ordinal score will be given in reactive trunk control. Assessment score represents as follows: 1= learning head control, 2= learning upper thoracic control, 3= learning mid-thoracic control, 4= learning lower thoracic control, 5= learning at upper lumber control, 6= learning lower lumbar control, 7= learning full trunk control and 8= achieved full trunk control.

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Attendance of Participants

    4 weeks

  • Visual Analogue Scale

    4 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants will undergo the whole body vibration therapy 1 session per day, 3 days per week for 4 weeks. The whole total whole body therapy session will last 18 minutes with 9 minutes of vibration.

Device: whole body vibration therapy

Interventions

The whole body vibration therapy regime is as follows: Day Vibration 1 Rest 1 Vibration 2 Rest 2 Vibration 3 Rest 3 1. st 1 min;12Hz 3 min 1 min;12Hz 3 min 1 min;15Hz 3 min 2. nd 1 min;15Hz 3 min 1 min;15Hz 3 min 2 min;15Hz 3 min 3. th 2 min;15Hz 3 min 3 min;15Hz 3 min 3 min;15Hz 3 min 4. th 2 min;24-25Hz 3 min 2 min;24-25Hz 3 min 2 min;24-25Hz 3 min \>5th 3 min;24-25Hz 3 min 3 min;24-25Hz 3 min 3 min;24-25Hz 3 min The participants will perform mini-squats during Vibrations 1 and 3 and weight-shifting between right and left legs during Vibration 2 on the vibration platform under the supervision of a trained research assistant.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of type III spinal muscular atrophy
  • Be able to stand on the vibration platform with or without support
  • Be able to undertake clinical examination and DXA evaluation
  • Informed consent by the participant's parent/ guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • There is a history of fracture within 8 weeks of enrolment of the present study and acute thrombosis, muscle or tendon inflammation, renal stones, discopathy or arthritis as reported by their parent/ guardian.
  • There is a history of using any of the following medications, regardless of dose, for at least 1 month, within 3 months of enrolment into the present study: anabolic agents, or growth hormone.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Hung Hom, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Vry J, Schubert IJ, Semler O, Haug V, Schonau E, Kirschner J. Whole-body vibration training in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014 Mar;18(2):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

    PMID: 24157400BACKGROUND
  • Henderson RC, Kairalla JA, Barrington JW, Abbas A, Stevenson RD. Longitudinal changes in bone density in children and adolescents with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.02.024.

    PMID: 15973316BACKGROUND
  • Stevenson RD, Conaway M, Barrington JW, Cuthill SL, Worley G, Henderson RC. Fracture rate in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Oct-Dec;9(4):396-403. doi: 10.1080/13638490600668061.

    PMID: 17111566BACKGROUND
  • Mergler S, Evenhuis HM, Boot AM, De Man SA, Bindels-De Heus KG, Huijbers WA, Penning C. Epidemiology of low bone mineral density and fractures in children with severe cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51(10):773-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03384.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

    PMID: 19614941BACKGROUND
  • Houlihan CM, Stevenson RD. Bone density in cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009 Aug;20(3):493-508. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.04.004.

    PMID: 19643349BACKGROUND
  • Henderson RC, Lark RK, Gurka MJ, Worley G, Fung EB, Conaway M, Stallings VA, Stevenson RD. Bone density and metabolism in children and adolescents with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):e5. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e5.

    PMID: 12093986BACKGROUND
  • Larson CM, Henderson RC. Bone mineral density and fractures in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):71-4.

    PMID: 10641693BACKGROUND
  • Rauch F. Vibration therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51 Suppl 4:166-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03418.x.

    PMID: 19740225BACKGROUND
  • Jordan MJ, Norris SR, Smith DJ, Herzog W. Vibration training: an overview of the area, training consequences, and future considerations. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 May;19(2):459-66. doi: 10.1519/13293.1.

    PMID: 15903391BACKGROUND
  • Rehn B, Lidstrom J, Skoglund J, Lindstrom B. Effects on leg muscular performance from whole-body vibration exercise: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Feb;17(1):2-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00578.x. Epub 2006 Aug 10.

    PMID: 16903900BACKGROUND
  • Matute-Llorente A, Gonzalez-Aguero A, Gomez-Cabello A, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Casajus Mallen JA. Effect of whole-body vibration therapy on health-related physical fitness in children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.001. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

    PMID: 24388109BACKGROUND
  • El-Shamy SM. Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;93(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a541a4.

    PMID: 24434887BACKGROUND
  • Unger M, Jelsma J, Stark C. Effect of a trunk-targeted intervention using vibration on posture and gait in children with spastic type cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16(2):79-88. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2012.715313.

    PMID: 23477461BACKGROUND
  • Novotny SA, Mader TL, Greising AG, Lin AS, Guldberg RE, Warren GL, Lowe DA. Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e104339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104339. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25121503BACKGROUND
  • Chelly J, Desguerre I. Progressive muscular dystrophies. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1343-66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00006-X.

    PMID: 23622359BACKGROUND
  • Myers KA, Ramage B, Khan A, Mah JK. Vibration therapy tolerated in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot study. Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Jul;51(1):126-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

    PMID: 24830767BACKGROUND
  • Soderpalm AC, Kroksmark AK, Magnusson P, Karlsson J, Tulinius M, Swolin-Eide D. Whole body vibration therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy--a prospective observational study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013 Mar;13(1):13-8.

    PMID: 23445910BACKGROUND
  • Ward K, Alsop C, Caulton J, Rubin C, Adams J, Mughal Z. Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):360-9. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040129. Epub 2004 Jan 27.

    PMID: 15040823BACKGROUND
  • Mazzone E, Bianco F, Main M, van den Hauwe M, Ash M, de Vries R, Fagoaga Mata J, Stein S, De Sanctis R, D'Amico A, Palermo C, Fanelli L, Scoto MC, Mayhew A, Eagle M, Vigo M, Febrer A, Korinthenberg R, de Visser M, Bushby K, Muntoni F, Goemans N, Sormani MP, Bertini E, Pane M, Mercuri E. Six minute walk test in type III spinal muscular atrophy: a 12month longitudinal study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013 Aug;23(8):624-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

    PMID: 23809874BACKGROUND
  • Noto Y, Misawa S, Mori M, Kawaguchi N, Kanai K, Shibuya K, Isose S, Nasu S, Sekiguchi Y, Beppu M, Ohmori S, Nakagawa M, Kuwabara S. Prominent fatigue in spinal muscular atrophy and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: evidence of activity-dependent conduction block. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Sep;124(9):1893-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.12.053. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

    PMID: 23643309BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodMuscular Atrophy, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeuromuscular DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Tamis W Pin
Organization
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study Officials

  • Tamis W Pin, PhD

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: A pilot study with a before and after study design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2016

First Posted

February 17, 2017

Study Start

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion

July 12, 2018

Study Completion

July 12, 2018

Last Updated

July 26, 2019

Results First Posted

July 26, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations