Study Stopped
Trial met primary efficacy endpoint target. No additional subjects necessary.
A Comparison of Technegas and Xenon-133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy
A Comparison of Technegas® and Xenon 133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy
1 other identifier
interventional
226
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Phase 3 within-subject non-inferiority trial of Technegas ventilation imaging compared to Xenon-133 (Xe-133) ventilation imaging to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Technegas compared to Xe-133 ventilation studies with respect to subject pulmonary ventilatory distribution. Subjects will undergo site-specific standard of care (SOC) Xe-133 imaging per medical needs followed by Technegas ventilation imaging per study protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for phase_3
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 23, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 24, 2021
CompletedSeptember 24, 2021
August 1, 2021
3 years
February 8, 2017
June 17, 2021
August 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Blinded Readers Percent Agreement (PA) for Matching Image Views
Three blinded readers independently assessed the Xe-133 and Technegas images in separate reading sessions. Readers were blinded to all clinical information except a subject's screening chest X-ray. Xe-133 images were obtained per site-specific standard of care. Technegas images included a 6-view image set, and the primary endpoint was based on assessment of the subset of views that matched the Xe-133 image views. At the start of each case-read, a reader visually divided each lung into 3 regions of approximately equal size arranged craniocaudally (apical, mid, and basal), 6 regions in total, and then assessed each lung region for ventilation according to a three-point scale: 0=absent ventilation, 1=decreased ventilation, 2=normal ventilation. At the unplanned interim stage, PA between the Xe-133 scores and Technegas scores was tested for non-inferiority at one-sided alpha=0.0141, equivalent to the lower bound of the 97.18% confidence interval exceeding 60%.
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Blinded Readers Percent Agreement (PA) for All Image Views
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Percent Agreement Measuring Inter-observer Agreement
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Kappa Statistics Between Pairs of Blinded Readers by Lung Region
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Study Arms (1)
Xe-133 Followed by Technegas
OTHERSubjects first inhaled active comparator Xe-133, approximately 10 to 30 millicuries (mCi), and ventilation planar scintigraphy was performed per site standard of care procedures for subject medical need. On the same day, following completion of Xe-133 imaging, subjects inhaled experimental Technegas (Technetium-99m labeled carbon particles), approximately 1.1 mCi, and ventilation planar scintigraphy was performed.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subject at least 18 years of age.
- Subject is a candidate for ventilation imaging.
- Subject must be willing and able to provide informed consent.
- Subject must be stable and able to undergo Xe-133 planar imaging and Technegas planar imaging.
- Subject must be willing and agree to complete study procedures.
- Subject is using adequate birth control, if female and fertile. Adequate birth control is defined as surgical sterilization, hormone contraceptive use or intrauterine device (IUD).
- Female subject of child-bearing potential has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.
- Subject has had or is scheduled to have a chest X-ray within 24 hours prior to the investigational imaging study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has been administered any other radiopharmaceutical within a timeframe that might cause interference with study imaging.
- Subject is a pregnant or lactating female.
- Subject has received Technegas in the past.
- Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to dosing.
- Subject is hemodynamically unstable.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Washington University Medical Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Center for Advanced Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Scott & White Medical Center
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
University of Utah Health Science Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Unblinded analysis of imaging efficacy data was to be done at completion of study and all blinded readings. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact on enrollment, FDA recommended an unplanned interim analysis be performed using blind read data from 200 subjects. Interim analysis was done by independent 3rd party statistician and reviewed by a Data Efficacy Monitoring Committee (DEMC), which recommended termination of the study based on positive results. Sponsor agreed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James McBrayer
- Organization
- Cyclomedica Australia Pty Ltd
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Edward M Aten, MD
Certus International, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Independent blinded readers will assess all ventilation scintigraphy images, masked as to subject identity and re-identified with a unique random code number (different code numbers for Xe-133 and Technegas images). The Xe-133 and Technegas images will be read in separate reading sessions in random order.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2017
First Posted
February 16, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 18, 2020
Study Completion
November 23, 2020
Last Updated
September 24, 2021
Results First Posted
September 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share