NCT03050996

Brief Summary

Urinary continence recovery remains one of the most bothersome side effect of modern radical prostate surgery and several technical modifications, especially in Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy procedures, have been reported in order to improve early urinary continence recovery. With the aim to improve the urinary continence recovery after robotic prostatectomy, we evaluate the impact of the use of a 6-branch retropubic suburethral autologous sling, created and placed during the procedure, in association with intraoperative evaluation of the retrograde leak point pressure by means of retrograde perfusion sphincterometry for proper sling tensioning.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Impact of radical prostatectomy and autologous suburethral placement on sphincteric apparatus and early urinary continence recovery

    evaluation of sphincteric competence after prostate ablation and sling placement under urodynamic evaluation (Retrograde Leak Point Pressure in cmH2O) and recovery of urinary continence (number of pads used)

    Intraoperative evaluation of sphincteric efficacy with Retrograde Leak Point Pressure evaluation - post operative recovery of urinary continence at catheter removal - 10 and 30 days after catheter removal - 6 and 12 months after surgery

Study Arms (1)

robotic radical prostatectomy patients

Patient scheduled to undergo robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

Procedure: robotic radical prostatectomy

Interventions

Urodynamic evaluation during robotic radical prostatectomy

Also known as: Questionnaires
robotic radical prostatectomy patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patient affected by prostate cancer, scheduled to undergo robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

You may qualify if:

  • Hystopathologically confirmed prostate cancer

You may not qualify if:

  • Preoperative urinary incontinence
  • Neurological disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Andrea Cestari

Milan, 20122, Italy

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsUrinary Incontinence

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Andrea Cestari, MD

    Istituto Auxologico Italiano

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Andrea Cestari, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head Department of Urology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2017

First Posted

February 13, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 30, 2017

Study Completion

June 30, 2017

Last Updated

February 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations