Evaluating Adult Patient Temperatures During Lower Spinal Surgery
Comparing Patient Temperatures in Adults During Lower Spinal Surgery Using Either a Heated Ventilator Circuit or a Standard Ventilator Circuit With a Heat-Moisture Exchanger
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients' temperatures after using one of two ventilator circuits (breathing systems): the ANAPOD™ Heat and Humidification System (ANAPOD™ system) or the standard ventilator circuit with a heat-moisture exchanger (standard ventilator). The ANAPOD™ system will provide additional heat and humidity to patients through their breathing tube while the standard ventilator will not. The investigators are doing this research study to find out if the ventilator circuit providing additional heat and humidity will keep patients warmer during surgery and after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 7, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.4 years
February 9, 2017
April 3, 2018
May 3, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Core Body Temperature
Core body temperature will be taken in the esophagus. The last recorded esophageal temperature will be used for surgeries not reaching 3 hours duration.
Approximately four hours post-induction of general anesthesia (or last recorded temperature)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Intraoperative Core Temperatures Post-induction
Approximately 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes post-induction of general anesthesia
Number of Subjects With Post-operative Shivering
Approximately 2 hours after completion of the surgery
Hospital Length of Stay
Surgery to hospital discharge
Overall Post-operative Temperature
PACU arrival
Number of Participants With Transfusion Within 48 Hours of Surgery
Within 48 hours of surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Heated Ventilator Circuit
EXPERIMENTALHeated and humidified inspired gases using the ANAPOD™ Heat and Humidification System (Westmed; Tucson, Arizona, USA) circuit prior to induction of general anesthesia in addition to standard ventilation and temperature management.
Standard Ventilator Circuit
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard ventilation and temperature management.
Interventions
active heat and humidification during anesthesia by warming inspire gases without a heat-moisture exchanger
no active heat and humidification during anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective spine surgery anticipated greater than three hours in duration
- Posterior approach
- An operative site between lumbar one and sacral one
- Involving two or more levels with fusion and/or instrumentation and/or revisions
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Status of I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a tracheostomy
- Preoperative temperature \>38°C or \<36°C on the day of surgery
- Active infection or erythema to the back
- White blood cell count greater than 10,500/microliter (mcL)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- Westmed, Inc.collaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was not blinded; investigators were unable to verify exact placement of the esophageal temperature probe; post-op shivering assessments and both OR and ANAPOD temperatures were not consistently recorded at regular intervals.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jean M. Guyer, DNP
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean M Guyer, DNP
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group prior to surgery. Group randomization was performed using a randomization schedule prepared by the Division of Clinical Statistics with patients randomized in blocks of four. For consented and enrolled patients on the day of surgery in the admit areas, a participant was assigned the next sequential participant ID number and the appropriate sealed envelope was opened to reveal the participant's randomized intervention. This occurred before the patient was transferred to the operating suite. Individuals who performed data analysis were blinded to treatment group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2017
First Posted
February 13, 2017
Study Start
August 28, 2015
Primary Completion
February 5, 2017
Study Completion
February 5, 2017
Last Updated
May 7, 2018
Results First Posted
May 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share