The Postural Control in Individuals With the Structural Leg-length Discrepancy
Does the Structural Leg-length Discrepancy Affect the Postural Control? Preliminary Study
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The structural leg-length inequality caused by the shortening of a segment of an extremity, results in an altered position of lower limb joints, the pelvis and the spine in static as well as dynamic conditions. That may induce a disturbance of the postural control. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the structural LLD on the control of the posture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2017
CompletedFebruary 10, 2017
February 1, 2017
7 days
February 6, 2017
February 8, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of mean COP velocity in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions during stance in subjects
Mean COP velocity \[mm/s\] is recorded in anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions within posturographic evaluation in examination of every participant.
1.02.2017
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of weight distribution during stance in subjects
1.02.2017
Study Arms (2)
Individuals with leg-length discrepancy
EXPERIMENTALPatients of Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences diagnosed with leg-length discrepancy. The examination of participants included a measurement of the length of lower limbs and the weight distribution as well as performing the static posturography.
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group with healthy individuals; without leg-length discrepancy. The examination of participants included a measurement of the weight distribution as well as performing the static posturography.
Interventions
The measurement of the weight distribution and the static posturography was performed on the balance platform Good Balance by Metitur . The device is comprised of the triangular force platform with electronic system and computer software. The body weight distribution was evaluated in the upright standing with eyes open, feet placed 20 cm from each other.The individual stood motionlessly for 15 s, then the measurement was recorded. The static posturography was performed with 3 various positions of feet, both with eyes open and eyes closed. (1) Position : normal standing - an upright standing with feet placed parallel 20 cm apart for 30 s. (2) Position: tandem - a stance with one foot placed ahead of the other. for 20 s. (3) Position: one leg standing: stance on the one leg for 20 s.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- for patients: structural leg length discrepancy
- for healthy volunteers: symmetrical length of lower limbs
You may not qualify if:
- for patients: achondroplasia, non-union, idiopathic scoliosis, extremity shortening in the course of neurological disease (e.g. Cerebral Palsy), vestibular disorder (e.g. Ménière's disease), diabetes, sensory disorder, intake of medications affecting psychomotor activity, dizziness, neurological diseases (e.g. epilepsy), BMI\>30, using mobility aids (e.g. crutches)
- for healthy volunteers: leg-length discrepancy, scoliosis, faulty posture, vestibular disorders, diabetes, intake of medications affecting psychomotor activity, dizziness, sensory disorders, neurological disease, BMI\>30.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, 61-701, Poland
Related Publications (10)
Mahar RK, Kirby RL, MacLeod DA. Simulated leg-length discrepancy: its effect on mean center-of-pressure position and postural sway. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Dec;66(12):822-4.
PMID: 4074116BACKGROUNDMurrell P, Cornwall MW, Doucet SK. Leg-length discrepancy: effect on the amplitude of postural sway. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Aug;72(9):646-8.
PMID: 1859258BACKGROUNDSabharwal S, Kumar A. Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2910-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0524-9. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
PMID: 18836788BACKGROUNDLisinski P, Huber J, Gajewska E, Szlapinski P. The body balance training effect on improvement of motor functions in paretic extremities in patients after stroke. A randomized, single blinded trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;114(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
PMID: 21963145BACKGROUNDSwaminathan V, Cartwright-Terry M, Moorehead JD, Bowey A, Scott SJ. The effect of leg length discrepancy upon load distribution in the static phase (standing). Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):561-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
PMID: 25082323BACKGROUNDPajala S, Era P, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Tolvanen A, Heikkinen E, Tiainen K, Rantanen T. Contribution of genetic and environmental effects to postural balance in older female twins. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jan;96(1):308-15. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00660.2003. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
PMID: 12959956BACKGROUNDBetsch M, Rapp W, Przibylla A, Jungbluth P, Hakimi M, Schneppendahl J, Thelen S, Wild M. Determination of the amount of leg length inequality that alters spinal posture in healthy subjects using rasterstereography. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jun;22(6):1354-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2720-x. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PMID: 23479027BACKGROUNDBetsch M, Wild M, Grosse B, Rapp W, Horstmann T. The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):691-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1912-5. Epub 2011 Jul 17.
PMID: 21769443BACKGROUNDYoung RS, Andrew PD, Cummings GS. Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility. Gait Posture. 2000 Jun;11(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00048-5.
PMID: 10802434BACKGROUNDEliks M, Ostiak-Tomaszewska W, Lisinski P, Koczewski P. Does structural leg-length discrepancy affect postural control? Preliminary study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 9;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1707-x.
PMID: 28793888DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Przemysław Lisiński, PhD
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant, MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2017
First Posted
February 9, 2017
Study Start
January 18, 2017
Primary Completion
January 25, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share