Ephedrine and Phenylephrine for Spinal Hypotension
Ephedrine Versus Phenylephrine Infusion for Prevention of Spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Section: Effect on Maternal Cardiodynamics and Fetal Circulation: Randomized Double-blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal anesthesia is widely used as the procedure of choice for cesarean delivery. In comparison to epidural anesthesia it is faster, easier to perform, patients are more comfortable, complication rates are lower, and it is more cost effective. Spinal anesthesia is an accepted technique in elective cesarean sections. However, hypotension, resulted from sympathectomy is a common problem, especially in pregnant women. Spinal block causes peripheral vasodilation and venous pooling, which may result in maternal hypotension. Maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, without prophylactic measures, has a very high incidence (80%-100%). Even though highly investigated, spinal induced hypotension remains a major concern, and it has been referred to as the "Holy Grail" of obstetric anesthesia. The detrimental effects of the spinal induced hypotension are maternal and fetal. Maternal effects are nausea, vomiting and dizziness. Hypotension results in reduced uterine and intervillous blood flow with potential fetal hypoxia and acidosis. Treatment and prevention of hypotension has been the subject of much investigation and controversy. Prophylactic measures include: 1) left lateral tilt, 2) fluid preload, 3) vasopressors,4) low dose spinal anesthesia. A 15° left lateral tilt is used routinely during cesarean section, to prevent aorto-caval compression, however it is not sufficient as a sole method. Left uterine displacement is achieved by tilting the operating table or by placing a wedge under the woman's hip. Aorto-caval compression also may increase the spread of spinal anesthesia. Among the non-pharmacological interventions studied to minimize the incidence of hypotension sitting the patient up for up to 7 min after CSE anesthesia for cesarean section reduced intraoperative ephedrine requirement without affecting the success of the spinal anesthetic. In contrast, sitting up for 9 min resulted in the need for rescue epidural anesthesia without additional benefit. Phenylephrine Treatment of vascular failure in shock, shock-like states, drug-induced hypotension or hypersensitivity; correction of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; prolongation of spinal anesthesia; vasoconstriction in regional analgesia; maintenance of adequate level of BP during spinal and inhalation anesthesia. It has a number of important attributes for treating spinal hypotension: (i) as an alpha-adrenergic agonist, its mechanism of action directly addresses the decrease in systemic vascular resistance following spinal anesthesia;(ii) phenylephrine has a faster onset of action compared with ephedrine; (iii) ephedrine is associated with a five-fold increased risk of fetal acidosis; and (iv) ephedrine is more likely to cross the placenta and increase concentrations of lactate, glucose, and catecholamines in the fetal circulation compared with phenylephrine. However, phenylephrine used alone may be accompanied by maternal bradycardia and does not benefit from widespread clinical experience, as does ephedrine do. Thus, phenylephrine has not yet become popular, particularly for prophylactic use. Clinical experience suggests that phenylephrine may be useful in addition to ephedrine when the latter fails to correct hypotension. Ephedrine sulphate is a potent sympathomimetic that stimulates both α and β receptors and has clinical uses related to both actions. Its peripheral actions, which it owes in part to the release of norepinephrine, simulate responses that are obtained when adrenergic nerves are stimulated. These include an increase in blood pressure, stimulation of heart muscle, constriction of arterioles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedOctober 27, 2020
October 1, 2020
3.1 years
February 7, 2017
October 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Maternal Cardiac Output
maternal cardiac output will be done using non-invasive thoracic bio-impedance monitor
30 minutes
Uterine Blood Flow
uterine blood flow indices will be done using Doppler
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
APGAR score
5 minutes
Complications
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group P
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive Phenylephrine 30 µg/minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.
Group E
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive Ephedrine 3 mg/ minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.
Interventions
30 patients will receive Phenylephrine 30 µg/minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.
30 patients will receive Ephedrine 3 mg/ minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 20-35 years.
- ASA physical I-II
- Singleton term pregnancy.
- Elective cesarean section.
You may not qualify if:
- Parturient refusal.
- Women with history of cardiac, respiratory, renal, neurologic or endocrine diseases.
- Women with known allergy to amide local anesthetics or any medications used in the study.
- Any contraindications to regional anesthesia e.g. coagulopathy.
- Pre-eclampsia.
- Fetal abnormalities.
- Emergency surgeries.
- Failed or unsatisfactory spinal block.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut university hospital
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
HAMDY A. YOUSSEF, MD
Assiut University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2017
First Posted
February 8, 2017
Study Start
February 7, 2017
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
October 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10