NCT03047109

Brief Summary

Spinal anesthesia is widely used as the procedure of choice for cesarean delivery. In comparison to epidural anesthesia it is faster, easier to perform, patients are more comfortable, complication rates are lower, and it is more cost effective. Spinal anesthesia is an accepted technique in elective cesarean sections. However, hypotension, resulted from sympathectomy is a common problem, especially in pregnant women. Spinal block causes peripheral vasodilation and venous pooling, which may result in maternal hypotension. Maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, without prophylactic measures, has a very high incidence (80%-100%). Even though highly investigated, spinal induced hypotension remains a major concern, and it has been referred to as the "Holy Grail" of obstetric anesthesia. The detrimental effects of the spinal induced hypotension are maternal and fetal. Maternal effects are nausea, vomiting and dizziness. Hypotension results in reduced uterine and intervillous blood flow with potential fetal hypoxia and acidosis. Treatment and prevention of hypotension has been the subject of much investigation and controversy. Prophylactic measures include: 1) left lateral tilt, 2) fluid preload, 3) vasopressors,4) low dose spinal anesthesia. A 15° left lateral tilt is used routinely during cesarean section, to prevent aorto-caval compression, however it is not sufficient as a sole method. Left uterine displacement is achieved by tilting the operating table or by placing a wedge under the woman's hip. Aorto-caval compression also may increase the spread of spinal anesthesia. Among the non-pharmacological interventions studied to minimize the incidence of hypotension sitting the patient up for up to 7 min after CSE anesthesia for cesarean section reduced intraoperative ephedrine requirement without affecting the success of the spinal anesthetic. In contrast, sitting up for 9 min resulted in the need for rescue epidural anesthesia without additional benefit. Phenylephrine Treatment of vascular failure in shock, shock-like states, drug-induced hypotension or hypersensitivity; correction of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; prolongation of spinal anesthesia; vasoconstriction in regional analgesia; maintenance of adequate level of BP during spinal and inhalation anesthesia. It has a number of important attributes for treating spinal hypotension: (i) as an alpha-adrenergic agonist, its mechanism of action directly addresses the decrease in systemic vascular resistance following spinal anesthesia;(ii) phenylephrine has a faster onset of action compared with ephedrine; (iii) ephedrine is associated with a five-fold increased risk of fetal acidosis; and (iv) ephedrine is more likely to cross the placenta and increase concentrations of lactate, glucose, and catecholamines in the fetal circulation compared with phenylephrine. However, phenylephrine used alone may be accompanied by maternal bradycardia and does not benefit from widespread clinical experience, as does ephedrine do. Thus, phenylephrine has not yet become popular, particularly for prophylactic use. Clinical experience suggests that phenylephrine may be useful in addition to ephedrine when the latter fails to correct hypotension. Ephedrine sulphate is a potent sympathomimetic that stimulates both α and β receptors and has clinical uses related to both actions. Its peripheral actions, which it owes in part to the release of norepinephrine, simulate responses that are obtained when adrenergic nerves are stimulated. These include an increase in blood pressure, stimulation of heart muscle, constriction of arterioles.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 7, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2017

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

EphedrinePhenylephrineSpinal HypotensionCesarean SectionMaternal Cardiodynamics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Maternal Cardiac Output

    maternal cardiac output will be done using non-invasive thoracic bio-impedance monitor

    30 minutes

  • Uterine Blood Flow

    uterine blood flow indices will be done using Doppler

    30 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • APGAR score

    5 minutes

  • Complications

    2 hours

Study Arms (2)

Group P

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive Phenylephrine 30 µg/minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.

Drug: Phenylephrine

Group E

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive Ephedrine 3 mg/ minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.

Drug: Ephedrine

Interventions

30 patients will receive Phenylephrine 30 µg/minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.

Group P

30 patients will receive Ephedrine 3 mg/ minute by syringe pump infusion for 30 minutes.

Group E

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 20-35 years.
  • ASA physical I-II
  • Singleton term pregnancy.
  • Elective cesarean section.

You may not qualify if:

  • Parturient refusal.
  • Women with history of cardiac, respiratory, renal, neurologic or endocrine diseases.
  • Women with known allergy to amide local anesthetics or any medications used in the study.
  • Any contraindications to regional anesthesia e.g. coagulopathy.
  • Pre-eclampsia.
  • Fetal abnormalities.
  • Emergency surgeries.
  • Failed or unsatisfactory spinal block.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university hospital

Asyut, 71515, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PhenylephrineEphedrine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAminesPropanolaminesPropanolsPhenethylaminesEthylamines

Study Officials

  • HAMDY A. YOUSSEF, MD

    Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Anesthesia and Intensive Care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2017

First Posted

February 8, 2017

Study Start

February 7, 2017

Primary Completion

March 30, 2020

Study Completion

March 30, 2020

Last Updated

October 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Locations