Platelet Transfusion During Neonatal Open Heart Surgery
CPB
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: Dilutional thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is universal and administration of donor apheresis platelets just prior to termination of bypass will assist in early correction of coagulopathy, early hemostasis and lesser donor exposure of blood products after cardiac surgery. Background: What is the Problem? - Bleeding, Transfusion and Outcomes
- 1.Excessive bleeding after neonatal cardiac surgery has been independently associated with increased adverse events, morbidity and mortality.1,2 Bleeding after neonatal open-heart surgery has multiple etiologies such as immaturity of the building blocks of coagulation, effects of deep hypothermia, longer CPB times, altered flow states and dilutional state induced by being on CPB leading to low platelet count, low platelet function, low fibrinogen levels, altered fibrinogen polymerization, complement activation, etc.2,3 The strongest predictor of transfusion after cardiopulmonary bypass in children was deemed to be the CPB circuit volume and the effect of hemodilution.4
- 2.The dilutional coagulopathy after neonatal CPB requires intense damage control resuscitation with massive transfusion of platelets, packed red blood cells (PRBC), cryoprecipitate, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and supplemental factor concentrates. In a previous study at this institution (IRB# HSC-MS-13-0647), we have shown that in neonates undergoing open-heart surgery there was a significant drop in platelet counts after bypass (71% change, baseline= 268 ± 90, Post CPB= 76 ± 27, 109/L). Associated with this drop , the average intraoperative transfusion load in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB at our institution constitutes of PRBC= 63± 43 ml/kg, FFP=51± 21 ml/kg, cryoprecipitate =12+6 ml/kg, platelets = 28 +16 ml/kg and cell-saver =27± 10 ml/kg. In addition 72% of these patients were exposed to a 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Bebulin®). Although this "throw the kitchen sink" approach is effective in achieving hemostasis, it comes with significant effects on post CPB hemodynamics, constantly changing hematocrit, variable blood volume with inability to achieve steady state inotropic state affecting cardiac output, oxygen delivery and adding to pulmonary hypertension.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 8, 2023
CompletedMarch 8, 2023
March 1, 2023
1.5 years
February 2, 2017
January 25, 2023
March 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of Blood Products Transfused
All Blood products administered (PRBC, FFP, Cryo, Platelets) from termination of CPB to first 24 hours post op
0-72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Exposures of 4-PCC and Factor 7
0-72 hours
Time From End of CPB to Sternal Closure (Chest Approximation)
0-72 hours
Chest Tube Output
0-24 hours
Inotropic Support at the Time of Entry to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) as Indicated by Inotrope Score
At the time of entry to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)
Length of Mechanical Ventilation
from start of mechanical ventilation to end of mechanical ventilation (about 4-8 days)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Study Group
EXPERIMENTALPlatelet Transfusion Management 1. Pre-Termination of CPB- Platelet Transfusion 10ml/kg to be administered to the patient via central venous access when the patient has been rewarmed to 35\*C, (the Sano or BT shunt clip is still on in children with SV physiology) 2. Post CPB- Platelet transfusion 10ml/kg via a central venous line is continued at a rate of 100 ml/hour till completion.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlatelet Transfusion Management 1. Pre-Termination of CPB- No intervention 2. Post CPB- Platelet transfusion 20ml/kg via a central venous line is continued at a rate of 100 ml/hour till completion.
Interventions
Post CPB- Platelet transfusion 20ml/kg via a central venous line is continued at a rate of 100 ml/hour till completion. 1. Initial transfusion to occur proximal to the hemofilter on the MUF circuit for as long as MUF lasts 2. Subsequent platelet transfusion continued till completion via central venous access to the patient
1. 1 unit of cryoprecipitate administered during MUF and or after MUF as needed 2. FFP transfusion 10ml/kg during MUF and or after MUF as needed
1\. Transfuse for target Hematocrit \> 40 in neonates with SV physiology; Transfuse for Hematocrit\> 33 for 2-Ventricle physiology
1\. Based on clinical bleeding and achievement of hemostasis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All neonates and infants less than 3 months of age under 4 kilograms undergoing open heart surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass
You may not qualify if:
- Redo open heart surgery
- Bleeding Disorders - such as von Willebrand Disease, Hemophilia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nischal K Gautam, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nischal K Gautam, MD
The University of Texas Health Science at Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
April 11, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 8, 2023
Results First Posted
March 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share