Remote Ischemic Conditioning Paired With Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
REVISE-2
A Proof-of-Concept Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Ischemic stroke, which is due to the occlusion of a cerebral blood vessel, comprises nearly 80-90% of all strokes. Currently, reperfusion of the salvageable tissue via thrombolytic drug or endovascular treatment is the most effective strategy to reduce brain damage. However, after recanalizing the occluded vessels, subsequent reperfusion injury is inevitable. It may not only weaken the therapeutic effects of timely reperfusion but also impede patients' recovery. Moreover, thousands of neuroprotective drugs effective in experimental models have been proved to be unsuccessful in clinical trials. Therefore, effective strategies are urgently needed to prevent and treat cerebral reperfusion injury and further improve the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. Researchers applied remote ischemic conditioning to mouse model of focal cerebral reperfusion injury and found that it could reduce cerebral infarct size. And clinical researches demonstrated that remote ischemic conditioning was an effective strategy to improve cerebral perfusion and prevent recurrent stroke in patients with ischemic stroke. However, whether remote ischemic conditioning is safe and effective in protecting patients with large-vessel ischemic stroke and undergoing endovascular treatment is still unclear. The investigators' hypothesis is that RIC is a safe and effective strategy to reduce brain injuries in stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2023
CompletedJuly 27, 2020
July 1, 2020
2.4 years
February 3, 2017
July 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cerebral infarction volume.
The cerebral infarction volume is evaluated on cerebral imaging.
7 days after stroke onset.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The proportion of enrolled subjects that completed all the designed RIC procedures.
0-7 days.
The severity of global disability at 90 days, as assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS).
0-90 days.
Change in NIHSS.
0-90 days.
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
0-90 days.
Safety - Assessment of adverse events and serious adverse events.
0-90 days.
Study Arms (2)
RIC group
EXPERIMENTALRIC (remote ischemic conditioning) paired with endovascular treatment.
Sham group
SHAM COMPARATORSham RIC (remote ischemic conditioning) paired with endovascular treatment.
Interventions
The RIC procedure consists of four cycles of unilateral arm ischemia for 5 minutes, which was followed by reperfusion for another 5 minutes. The procedure is performed with an electric, autocontrol device with a cuff that inflated to a pressure of 200 mmHg during the ischemia period. RIC is performed before recanalization of the occluded artery, immediately following successful recanalization, and once daily for the subsequent 7 days.
Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is performed by experienced neuroradiologist according to the latest guideline from American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.It includes thrombectomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis, thrombus aspiration, stenting and balloon angioplasty.
The sham RIC procedure consists of four cycles of unilateral arm ischemia for 5 minutes, which was followed by reperfusion for another 5 minutes. The procedure is performed with an electric, autocontrol device with a cuff that inflated to a pressure of 30 mmHg during the ischemia period. Sham RIC is performed before recanalization of the occluded artery, immediately following successful recanalization, and once daily for the subsequent 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute ischemic stroke where patient is ineligible for intravenous thrombolytic treatment or the treatment is contraindicated, or where patient has received intravenous thrombolytic therapy without recanalization;
- Suspected proximal anterior circulation occlusion;
- No remarkable pre-stroke functional disability (mRS ≤ 1);
- Baseline NIHSS score obtained prior to randomization must be ≥6;
- Age ≥18 and ≤ 80;
- Patient treatable within 24 hours of symptom onset;
- Informed consent obtained from patient or acceptable patient's surrogate
You may not qualify if:
- Identified hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \> 3.0;
- Baseline platelet count \< 30\*109/L;
- Baseline blood glucose of \< 2.7mmol/L or \>22.2mmol/L;
- Renal insufficiency with creatinine ≥ 265 umol/L;
- Severe, sustained hypertension (SBP \> 185 mmHg or DBP \> 110 mmHg);
- Rapidly improving symptoms at the discretion of the investigator;
- Seizures at stroke onset which would preclude obtaining a baseline NIHSS;
- Serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy of less than one year;
- History of life threatening allergy to contrast medium, Nickel, Titanium metals or their alloys;
- Woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant or lactating or who has a positive pregnancy test on admission;
- Subject participating in a study involving other drug or device trial study;
- Patients with a pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations;
- Unlikely to be available for 90-day follow-up;
- Contraindication for remote ischemic conditioning: severe soft tissue injury, fracture, or peripheral vascular disease in the upper limbs;
- Hypodensity on CT or restricted diffusion amounting to an ASPECTS score of \<7 on noncontrast CT or \<6 on DWI MRI;
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Capital Medical Universitylead
- Shengli Oilfield Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (5)
Hausenloy DJ, Barrabes JA, Botker HE, Davidson SM, Di Lisa F, Downey J, Engstrom T, Ferdinandy P, Carbrera-Fuentes HA, Heusch G, Ibanez B, Iliodromitis EK, Inserte J, Jennings R, Kalia N, Kharbanda R, Lecour S, Marber M, Miura T, Ovize M, Perez-Pinzon MA, Piper HM, Przyklenk K, Schmidt MR, Redington A, Ruiz-Meana M, Vilahur G, Vinten-Johansen J, Yellon DM, Garcia-Dorado D. Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery. Basic Res Cardiol. 2016 Nov;111(6):70. doi: 10.1007/s00395-016-0588-8. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
PMID: 27766474BACKGROUNDZhao W, Meng R, Ma C, Hou B, Jiao L, Zhu F, Wu W, Shi J, Duan Y, Zhang R, Zhang J, Sun Y, Zhang H, Ling F, Wang Y, Feng W, Ding Y, Ovbiagele B, Ji X. Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients With Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Before Carotid Artery Stenting: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2017 Apr 4;135(14):1325-1335. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024807. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
PMID: 28174194BACKGROUNDZhao W, Che R, Li S, Ren C, Li C, Wu C, Lu H, Chen J, Duan J, Meng R, Ji X. Remote ischemic conditioning for acute stroke patients treated with thrombectomy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Jun 6;5(7):850-856. doi: 10.1002/acn3.588. eCollection 2018 Jul.
PMID: 30009202BACKGROUNDZhao W, Wu C, Dornbos D 3rd, Li S, Song H, Wang Y, Ding Y, Ji X. Multiphase adjuvant neuroprotection: A novel paradigm for improving acute ischemic stroke outcomes. Brain Circ. 2020 Feb 18;6(1):11-18. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_58_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 32166195BACKGROUNDZhao W, Li S, Ren C, Meng R, Jin K, Ji X. Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: clinical data, challenges, and future directions. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Nov 15;6(1):186-196. doi: 10.1002/acn3.691. eCollection 2019 Jan.
PMID: 30656197BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2023
Last Updated
July 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share