Review of the Paediatric Pleuropulmonary Blastoma French Series
PPB
4 other identifiers
observational
41
1 country
18
Brief Summary
Pleuropulmonary blastoma is a rare embryonic malignant tumour that remains the most frequent malignant tumour of the lung in childhood. The International Pleuro pulmonary Blastoma Registry (IPPB) found only 220 cases in 2009 and 350 in 2015. In France, 20 cases were identified in 2009. Three histologies are described: type 1 purely cystic, type 2 combined and type 3 solid. Median age at diagnostic is 12 months, 35 months and 41 months respectively. Evolution is possible from type 1 to type 2 or 3 in 10% of the cases. Since 2009, DICER 1 mutations research is proposed systematically to all families. PPB symptoms are usually non-specific. Diagnostic is evoked when imaging work up shows bubbles or solid lesions, and confirmed by pathological analysis. However the diagnosis can be difficult because of the proximity with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. The French society of paediatric oncology recommends surgery at first instance. PPB type 1 remains a problem because some are still misdiagnosed as CCAM, a benign lesion. Chemotherapy depends on the PPB type and the quality of the resection. There is a real interest to analyse the French series. The prognosis of type 2 and 3 is low with a 5 years survival rate of 45-60%, whereas type 1 survival rate is 91%. The French experience reports a 100% survival rate in type 1 and 48% in type 2 and 3. Other prognostic factors are initial size of the tumour, extra pulmonary invasion and quality of surgery. Early local relapses are possible and late ones concern more often type 2 and 3 with more cerebral metastasis. In 2009, the french cases were collected, but no update has been performed since. The aim of this retrospective review of the cases since 2000, is to audit the care of PPB patients in France and update the French rare tumour database. Evoking PPB diagnosis is difficult when imaging shows a neonatal cystic lesion. There are no radiologic criteria in the literature that differentiate congenital pulmonary cystic lesion and PPB type 1. Radiological presentation is however overlapping. Another aim of this study will be to look for a predictive sign of type 1 PPB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2017
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2018
CompletedAugust 12, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.1 years
January 16, 2017
August 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall survival
Within 5 years from the diagnosis
Progression free survival
Characterize the evolution and the global care of PPB in the French series
Within 5 years from the diagnosis
Secondary Outcomes (2)
State of PPB surgical care
Within 5 years from the diagnosis
Radiology sign
Within 5 years from the diagnosis
Study Arms (1)
Pleuropulmonary Blastoma
* Patients born between 01/01/2000 and 01/01/2016 ; * Followed up for PPB * Treated in a French department of paediatric oncology or paediatric surgery * Study agreement
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients born between 01/01/2000 and 01/01/2016, followed up for PPB, treated in a French department of paediatric oncology or paediatric surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Patients born between 01/01/2000 and 01/01/2016 ;
- Followed up for PPB
- Treated in a French department of paediatric oncology or paediatric surgery
- Study agreement
You may not qualify if:
- Part of the care out of France
- Study disagreement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
Angers University Hospital
Angers, 49000, France
Bordeaux University Hospital
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Caen University Hospital
Caen, 14000, France
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble, 38000, France
Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94000, France
Lille University Hospital
Lille, 59000, France
Lyon Universty Hospital
Lyon, 69000, France
Marseille University Hospital
Marseille, 13000, France
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier, 34000, France
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, 44000, France
Nice University Hospital
Nice, 06000, France
Necher Hospital
Paris, 75000, France
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers, 86000, France
Curie Institute
Saint-Cloud, 92000, France
Réunion University Hospital
Saint-Paul, 97000, France
Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse, 31000, France
Tours University Hospital
Tours, 37000, France
Gustave Roussy Institute
Villejuif, 94000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexis ARNAUD, MD
Rennes University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
January 9, 2017
Primary Completion
February 22, 2018
Study Completion
July 9, 2018
Last Updated
August 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08