Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Robot-Assisted Upper Arm Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was designed to establish the clinical evidence for effect of Robot-Assisted upper arm training and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on upper limb function of subacute stroke patients.
- Purpose : to elucidate the effect of Robot-Assisted upper arm training and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on upper limb function of stroke patients compared to conventional occupational therapy
- Subjects : total 99 patients with stroke whose upper limb functions are impaired
- Intervention : 4 weeks of therapy (5 days per week)
- Studies : upper limb functional assessment (FMA, MFT, WMFT), computerized motion analysis
- Evaluation plan : 1) pre-intervention, 2) post-2 weeks of intervention, 3) post-4 weeks of intervention, 4) 4 weeks after end of intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Jun 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2018
CompletedMarch 18, 2019
March 1, 2019
3 years
January 30, 2017
March 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.
1 minute before the first intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.
2 weeks after the first intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.
4 weeks after the first intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.
4 weeks after the final intervention
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Wolf motor function test
1 minute before the first intervention
Wolf motor function test
2 weeks after the first intervention
Wolf motor function test
4 weeks after the first intervention
Wolf motor function test
4 weeks after the final intervention
Manual Function test
1 minute before the first intervention
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Robot and rTMS
EXPERIMENTALRobot-Assisted upper arm training and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation group(intervention group 1)
Robot
EXPERIMENTALRobot-Assisted upper arm training group(intervention group2)
Conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional training group(control group)
Interventions
The Armeo, a robot with a spring mechanism allowing adjustable arm weight support, can generate assistive forces of up to 66N in flexion/extension and up to 30N for the arm and forearm respectively. This robot integrates seven angle sensors and one pressure sensor that allow direct interaction between the motion of the patient's arm and the associated therapy software. rTMS is a magnetic method used to stimulate small regions of the brain. The Robot and rTMS group will receive the robot-assisted upper arm training and rTMS for 5 times per week, for 4 weeks. And all patients of three groups will receive the additional conventional occupational therapy for 30 minutes daily 5 times per week, for 4 weeks.
The Armeo, a robot with a spring mechanism allowing adjustable arm weight support, can generate assistive forces of up to 66N in flexion/extension and up to 30N for the arm and forearm respectively. This robot integrates seven angle sensors and one pressure sensor that allow direct interaction between the motion of the patient's arm and the associated therapy software. The Robot group will receive the robot-assisted upper arm training for 30 minutes daily 5 times per week, for 4 weeks. And all patients of three groups will receive the additional conventional occupational therapy for 30 minutes daily 5 times per week, for 4 weeks.
The conventional group will receive occupational therapy for 30 minutes daily 5 times per week, for 4 weeks instead of Robot or rTMS. And all patients of three groups will receive the additional conventional occupational therapy for 30 minutes daily 5 times per week, for 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Upper FMA 7-38
- Hemiplegic patients within 6months after stroke onset
- male or female, 20 years older
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with cognitive impairment who are unable to comply with protocol-required procedure
- Quadriplegic or double hemiplegic patients
- Patients with musculoskeletal disease, peripheral nerve disease in upper extremity
- Patients with lower motor neuron disease
- Patients who cannot perform rTMS
- Pregnant woman
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 3, 2017
Study Start
June 18, 2015
Primary Completion
June 26, 2018
Study Completion
June 26, 2018
Last Updated
March 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03