Prospective Comparison Between FDG-PET/MR and FDG-PET/CT in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and DLBC Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
According to the most recent guidelines, total-body imaging techniques are an indispensable element in the staging and post-treatment re-evaluation in patients with lymphoma. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is the gold-standard for the assessment of the disease in these patients. The use of alternative methods, without radiation, such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), could be a valid alternative; this would result an advantage, considering the young age of the majority of patients at diagnosis and the need to undergo to serial assessments. The recent introduction of combined PET total body MRI (PET/MRI) offers the possibility to integrate morphological information with the high resolution of MRI with the metabolic activity of PET, through the uptake of FDG, for a more accurate definition of the extent of disease in patients with lymphoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedJune 12, 2020
June 1, 2020
3.4 years
January 24, 2017
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/MRI in the staging and post-chemotherapy revaluation
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/MRI in the staging and post-chemotherapy revaluation (early treatment response after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and final assessment) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as compared to conventional assessment by FDG PET/ contrast-enhanced CT
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Hodgkin lymphoma patients
Hodgkin lymphoma patients with confirmed histological diagnosis
DLBC non Hodgkin lymphoma patients
DLBC non Hodgkin lymphoma patients with confirmed histological diagnosis
Interventions
Combined assessment with FDG PET/TC and PET/MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Adult Patients (\>18 yrs) with histological diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma;
- Age ≥18 years;
- The need of anti-neoplastic treatment;
- Written informed consent;
You may not qualify if:
- Carriers of cardiac pacemakers;
- Carriers of metal mesh implants, tissue expanders (breast);
- Holders of metal implants, cochlear implants and stapedial prostheses, plates or screws, wires, nails, spinal-column distractors, ferromagnetic vascular clips, mechanical heart valves, Swan-Ganz catheter, endocorporal electrodes, neurostimulators, vascular filters, stents and metal spirals that they do not know the characteristics (the manufacturer, type and date of implant) and/or secure magnetic compatibility;
- Holders of metal fragments in the eye, visceral or intracranial;
- Tattoo holders executed by less than 6 months;
- Claustrophobic patients;
- Pregnant patients;
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
- Patients who do not provide written informed consent to the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Marco Picardilead
- Federico II Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Prof Marco Picardi
Naples, 80131, Italy
Prof Marco Picardi - Hematology - AOU FEDERICO II
Napoli, 80131, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabrizio Pane, Prof
Hematology - AOU Federico II - Naples - Italy
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marco Picardi, Prof
Hematology - AOU Federico II - Naples - Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrea Soricelli, Prof
IRCSS SDN - Naples - Italy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2017
First Posted
February 3, 2017
Study Start
January 24, 2017
Primary Completion
June 10, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06