NCT03041649

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare two low profile balloon gastrostomy button enteral feeding devices, both currently used as standard of medical care. The investigators aim to compare family preference and rate of complications between the two devices in a prospective cohort of children. This is the first step in comparing initial and long-term outcomes along with the need for seeking medical advice for gastrostomy site-related complications. The secondary aim of this study is to follow this population long term (4 years) to document the prevalence of: granulation tissue, infection, skin breakdown, and how long the gastrostomy tube balloon remains functional (does not lose water).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
158

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 9, 2017

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2017

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 21, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

January 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Gastroesophageal RefluxFeeding DisorderGastrostomy tubeFamily SatisfactionGT buttonEnteral nutritionGastrostomy button

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Parent preference

    Parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep at the 4-month visit.

    4 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Enteral Access Assessment Sheet

    Up to 4 years after button placement

Study Arms (2)

GT button change - Mic-Key

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to the Mic-Key arm will have the Mic-Key button placed initially at surgery, and at the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months, will change to the Mini One button. At the routine 4-month visit, parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep.

Other: GT button change - Mini One

GT button change - Mini One

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to the Mini One arm will have the Mini One button placed initially at surgery, and at the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months, will change to the Mic-Key button. At the routine 4-month visit, parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep.

Other: GT button change - Mic-Key

Interventions

After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.

GT button change - Mini One

After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.

GT button change - Mic-Key

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children ages 0-5 years of age requiring 0.8 cm or 1.0 cm gastrostomy feeding devices for enteral nutrition seen in the Surgery, GI or Special Care clinics
  • Gastrostomy placement after IRB approval (enrollment will continue until 170 evaluable subjects have completed the 4 month visit. Expected attrition for the 4 year follow-up is 40%.
  • English-speaking families

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with dermatologic conditions influencing gastrostomy site healing and tract epithelialization
  • Children with immunosuppression
  • Children with active malignancy requiring treatment
  • Inability to commit to 4 months follow up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Mercy Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Abdelhadi RA, Dekonenko C, Dorman RM, Oyetunji TA, St Peter SD. A Prospective, Randomized Cross-over Trial of 2 Low-profile Gastrostomy Buttons to Determine Family Preference. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Mar;70(3):386-388. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002585.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal RefluxFeeding and Eating Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Esophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Shawn D St. Peter, MD

    Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2017

First Posted

February 3, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

April 1, 2020

Study Completion

April 1, 2020

Last Updated

October 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations