Mic-Key Versus Mini One Family Preference Comparison
MicKeyVMini
Mic-Key Versus Mini: A Prospective, Randomized Trial for Family Preference Comparing Low Profile Balloon Gastrostomy Buttons
1 other identifier
interventional
158
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare two low profile balloon gastrostomy button enteral feeding devices, both currently used as standard of medical care. The investigators aim to compare family preference and rate of complications between the two devices in a prospective cohort of children. This is the first step in comparing initial and long-term outcomes along with the need for seeking medical advice for gastrostomy site-related complications. The secondary aim of this study is to follow this population long term (4 years) to document the prevalence of: granulation tissue, infection, skin breakdown, and how long the gastrostomy tube balloon remains functional (does not lose water).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 21, 2021
October 1, 2021
3.4 years
January 9, 2017
October 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Parent preference
Parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep at the 4-month visit.
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Enteral Access Assessment Sheet
Up to 4 years after button placement
Study Arms (2)
GT button change - Mic-Key
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomized to the Mic-Key arm will have the Mic-Key button placed initially at surgery, and at the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months, will change to the Mini One button. At the routine 4-month visit, parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep.
GT button change - Mini One
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomized to the Mini One arm will have the Mini One button placed initially at surgery, and at the first gastrostomy change in the clinic at 2 months, will change to the Mic-Key button. At the routine 4-month visit, parents will be asked which button they prefer to keep.
Interventions
After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.
After 2 months with each button, parents will be asked which button they prefer at the 4-month post-operational follow-up visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children ages 0-5 years of age requiring 0.8 cm or 1.0 cm gastrostomy feeding devices for enteral nutrition seen in the Surgery, GI or Special Care clinics
- Gastrostomy placement after IRB approval (enrollment will continue until 170 evaluable subjects have completed the 4 month visit. Expected attrition for the 4 year follow-up is 40%.
- English-speaking families
You may not qualify if:
- Children with dermatologic conditions influencing gastrostomy site healing and tract epithelialization
- Children with immunosuppression
- Children with active malignancy requiring treatment
- Inability to commit to 4 months follow up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Mercy Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
Related Publications (1)
Abdelhadi RA, Dekonenko C, Dorman RM, Oyetunji TA, St Peter SD. A Prospective, Randomized Cross-over Trial of 2 Low-profile Gastrostomy Buttons to Determine Family Preference. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Mar;70(3):386-388. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002585.
PMID: 31834114DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shawn D St. Peter, MD
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2017
First Posted
February 3, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share