Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Disposable to Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stone
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Reusable flexible ureteroscopes are widely used to treat various upper urinary tract diseases including urinary stones. However, they require a long turnover time between procedures because of the sterilization process. Moreover, repeated use of a scope ultimately deteriorates its image quality which leads to a high maintenance cost in the long-term. A disposable digital flexible ureteroscope was released in the United States in January 2016, offering an improved image resolution, new scope performance characteristics with every case, and no need for sterilization and repair. Preliminary data from our center has demonstrated that disposable scopes shorten operative time by 25% compared to reusable fiberoptic scope and are associated with a 2/3 reduction in procedural complication rate. Therefore, treatment with disposable scopes may be more effective for patients and facilitate cost management within the hospital. Here, we propose a three-armed, prospective randomized study, comparing treatment outcomes between disposable digital, reusable fiberoptic, and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 1, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.1 years
January 23, 2017
January 31, 2020
September 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Procedure Time
at the surgery day, this will be a duration that each ureteroscopy is performed for a patient, assessed between 10 and 120 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants That Are Stone Free
three month after surgery
Number of Participants With Complications
from during the surgery to three months after the surgery
Study Arms (2)
reusable fiberoptic ureteroscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor this arm, participants will receive the ureteroscopy for their kidney and ureter stones using reusable fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope (URF-P6, Olympus). The surgical method of the ureteroscopy will be a standard fashion same as other arms.
disposable digital ureteroscope
EXPERIMENTALFor this arm, participants will receive the ureteroscopy for their kidney and ureter stones using disposable digital flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue, Boston Scientific). The surgical method of the ureteroscopy will be a standard fashion same as other arms.
Interventions
We will use reusable fiberoptic ureteroscopes for the treatment of kidney and ureter stones.
We will use disposable digital ureteroscopes for the treatment of kidney and ureter stones.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at their first clinical visit.
- Patients with either unilateral or bilateral upper urinary tract stone of any size and location, treatable by flexible ureteroscopy, diagnosed by preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography or plain radiographic imaging
- Patients being able and willing to provide consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Serious illness likely to cause death within the next 5 years, so as to exclude significant metabolic derangements that might lead to adverse surgical outcome.
- Pregnancy.
- Staged ureteroscopic procedure.
- Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy.
- Dual procedures (ureteroscopy concurrently performed with other operations).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (12)
Healy KA, Pak RW, Cleary RC, Colon-Herdman A, Bagley DH. Hand problems among endourologists. J Endourol. 2011 Dec;25(12):1915-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0128. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
PMID: 22004843BACKGROUNDKaraolides T, Bach C, Kachrilas S, Goyal A, Masood J, Buchholz N. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23465156BACKGROUNDMultescu R, Geavlete B, Geavlete P. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
PMID: 23992972BACKGROUNDSomani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD, Traxer O. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology. 2013 Nov;82(5):1017-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
PMID: 24001703BACKGROUNDCarey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 May 14.
PMID: 24837456BACKGROUNDde la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O; CROES URS Study Group. The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):131-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0436. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
PMID: 24147820BACKGROUNDGeavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jul;11(7):373-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.118. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PMID: 24890883BACKGROUNDTosoian JJ, Ludwig W, Sopko N, Mullins JK, Matlaga BR. The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program. J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):406-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0435. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
PMID: 25286008BACKGROUNDButtice S, Sener TE, Netsch C, Emiliani E, Pappalardo R, Magno C. LithoVue: A new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope. Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(3):302-305. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.872. Epub 2016 Aug 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 27730000BACKGROUNDDoizi S, Kamphuis G, Giusti G, Andreassen KH, Knoll T, Osther PJ, Scoffone C, Perez-Fentes D, Proietti S, Wiseman O, de la Rosette J, Traxer O. First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):809-818. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1936-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
PMID: 27671898BACKGROUNDMartin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Muhsin H, Lim VM, Nunez-Nateras R, Tyson MD, Humphreys MR. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.085. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
PMID: 27693449BACKGROUNDUsawachintachit M, Isaacson DS, Taguchi K, Tzou DT, Hsi RS, Sherer BA, Stoller ML, Chi T. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):468-475. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0027. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
PMID: 28287823RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Thomas Chi
- Organization
- UCSF
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Chi, MD
Urology, University of California San Francisco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2017
First Posted
February 2, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Results First Posted
October 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share