Loading search results
WHIPLASH
Sponsor study identifier
observational
95
1 country
1
Study Start
June 2015
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
November 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2016
Actual (reported)Whiplash trauma and the resulting whiplash associated disorders have been the subject of much attention in the scientific literature and remain a major public health problem. The most commonly encountered symptoms are neck pain, headache, low back pain, shoulder pain, as well as visual impairment. It is not unusual for neck pain to become chronic, and when this occurs, there may be serious consequences on a social, professional and financial level. Even though the role of the initial episode should not be ignored, progression to chronic pain is probably multifactorial and, like non-specific low back pain, psycho-social factors, and in particular patient fears and belief, seem to play a relevant role, as do environmental factors. The professional consensus is that it is useful to provide targeted information at an early stage in whiplash settings in order to reduce mistaken fears and beliefs. A preliminary study enabled the investigators to validate a French version of an information booklet that draws on validated data from evidence-based medicine. The booklet was "Le guide du coup de fouet cervical," the French version of The Whiplash Book. This study showed that fears and beliefs were considerably high in a population without neck problems who were working in hospitals. It also revealed that simply providing information could help lessen them. Management following whiplash injury can make use of the recommendations as published in the literature. Healthcare professionals must reassure and educate their patients that post-traumatic pain is normal, and that they need to remain active and maintain physical activity in order to improve their prognosis. Only very few studies have evaluated the adherence of physicians or healthcare professionals to the guidelines and to ways of changing their approach to treatment. The main aim of this study was to determine what fears and beliefs physicians have about the consequences of whiplash. The secondary aim was to measure the impact of a validated information booklet on emergency physicians' approach to management following a whiplash injury.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2016
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
June 2015
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
November 2016
Actual (reported)December 2016
Actual (reported)January 13, 2017
Actual (reported)February 2, 2017
Actual (reported)assessment of fears and beliefs in the sample of physicians tested using questionnaire WBQ (whiplash belief questionnaire)
For each statement, the physician must express his or her level of agreement or disagreement, with a score that varies from 9 to 45. The higher the score, the stronger the beliefs
48 hours after reading the information booklet
assessment of fears and beliefs in the sample of physicians tested using the FABQ (Fear Avoidance Belief questionnaire)
The FABQ (Fear Avoidance Belief questionnaire) comprises two independent scales: the physical activity FABQ and work FABQ
48 hours after reading the information booklet
Measurement of the impact of a validated information booklet on emergency physicians' approach to management following a whiplash injury.
10 days for control group or minimum 48 hours after reading the information booklet for interventional group
Non-pharmacological management of a whiplash injury
10 days for control group or minimum 48 hours after reading the information booklet for interventional group
The intervention group was instructed to complete the questionnaires at least 48 hours after the intervention that is, after reading the information booklet
The same items were included as in the initial folder, with an additional questionnaire enabling the intervention group to qualitatively assess the information booklet. If there was no response, reminders were sent by email, then by telephone, and lastly by post.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
emergency physicians
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Emmanuel COUDEYRE
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
95 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
January 13, 2017
First Posted
February 2, 2017
Study Start
June 2015
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2016
Actual (reported)Last Updated
February 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: