Grade Book Game Evaluation Among 6th Grade Students
GG
Improving School Engagement Among Early Adolescents: Evaluation of a Team-based Social Network Intervention
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
School engagement is associated with children's long-term health and success. Students who are engaged in school have better academic outcomes and lower rates of risky health behaviors. The investigators partnered with Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy 12 (Alliance 12), a charter school in Los Angeles, to develop the "gradebook game", an intervention that aims to improve academic achievement, peer support, and school engagement. The game involves frequent feedback on students' school performance, team-based competition aligned with the school mission, and peer mentorship by team captains. For the 2016-2017 academic year, the investigators will assist Alliance 12 in implementing the gradebook game in two of its five 6th grade homerooms. The investigators plan to evaluate whether the game, as hypothesized, is effective in increasing school engagement, including academic performance and positive behavior. In order to conduct this evaluation, the investigators plan to enroll 6th grade students by obtaining parental consent and student assent at the beginning of the school year. Students will be enrolled for the entire 2016-2017 academic year. All study procedures except for parental recruitment will occur during the school day. Participation in the study involves completing 2 student surveys and permitting the collection and analysis of student data from the online gradebook and behavior system. The investigators plan to use an interrupted time series design that will analyze student gradebook and behavior data at multiple time points before and after the game starts. The surveys will be completed at the beginning and end of the study period. Surveys will include measures of self-reported school engagement, age, gender, race/ethnicity, primary language at home, social and emotional well-being, social status, and peer support. Surveys will be administered via iPad. If the pilot study demonstrates that the gradebook game is effective in promoting school engagement and academic achievement, it is anticipated that it could be widely adopted and more rigorously evaluated in a larger study. Because the gradebook game is a low-resource intervention, it could easily and sustainably be replicated, providing a much-needed tool for schools with low engagement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2017
CompletedOctober 30, 2017
October 1, 2017
9 months
January 30, 2017
October 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Academic and Behavior Information
collect school grade book and behavior information weekly for 8 to 10 time points before and after the intervention is implemented.
up to 20 times during 6 month period
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Social Emotional well being, social status and peer support
baseline and at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
The middle school selected 2 advisory classrooms to participate in the Gradebook game during 6th grade. Students in these 2 classrooms were block randomized to teams by baseline grade book and student engagement scores. These small student teams stay together for an entire year and meet once or twice a week. Teams are led by 8th grade student team captains, picked by school staff for their positive leadership skills. Every 2 weeks throughout the year, teams are randomly matched in head-to-head competition. In each 2-week-long game (i.e. Gradebook Game), individual team members accrue points from teachers and administrators for academic performance, effort, and school behavior. Team wins are announced and public scoreboards are updated frequently. The investigators will collect student survey data at baseline and after the intervention, approximately 5-6 months apart.
Control
The middle school has chosen three 6th grade classrooms that will not play the Gradebook game. The investigators will collect school gradebook and behavior information weekly for 8 to 10 time points before and after the intervention is implemented. Students will complete a survey at baseline and after the intervention, approximately 5-6 months apart.
Interventions
Students in the intervention group will spend time meeting as teams to review their scorecards, and do team-building activities, all of which will occur during non-content periods at school (Advisory and Enrichment).
Eligibility Criteria
Participants must be 6th grade students at Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy. They need to assent and have signed parental consent to participate.
You may qualify if:
- Student must be attending 6th grade at Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy.
- Must assent and have signed parental consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Students whose parents are not able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mitchell D Wong, MD, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine; Faculty Mentor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 1, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Last Updated
October 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Participants have been assigned a study ID number to link their name, address, phone number, grade book and behavior data, and survey responses. This ID will be used for all survey data collection and to identify all grade book and behavior data. The computer file linking the personal identifiers and the study ID number will be kept separate from the survey, grade book, and behavior data. Personally identifying information pertaining to individual participants will not be shared or made available to other researchers. Any data request will be made to the Faculty Sponsor (Mitchell Wong, MD PhD) or to the principle investigator (Ashley Lewis-Hunter, MD) and any data shared will be encrypted and will not include any personal identifying information.