NCT03035292

Brief Summary

Sensitivity and specificity of current screening methods for childhood cataracts is poor. This results in delayed diagnosis and management which can decrease the visual prognosis following cataract surgery. It also results in many false positives with resultant unnecessary healthcare costs in specialist paediatric ophthalmology services. This study compares the accuracy of cataract screening using infrared light compared to white light in a population of children attending eye clinic.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2017

Completed
6.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 24, 2017

Results QC Date

July 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Results of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Tests Compared to Gold Standard

    True positives: the number of eyes with cataract correctly identified True negatives: the number of eyes without cataract correctly identified False positives: the number of eyes without cataracts incorrectly identified as having cataract False negatives positives: the number of eyes with cataract incorrectly identified as not having cataract

    1 day

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Testing

    Sensitivity (percentage of eyes with cataract correctly identified) and specificity (percentage of eyes without cataract correctly identified) of red-reflex and infrared-reflex testing in percentage terms with 95% Confidence Intervals. Sensitivity and specificity are recorded as a percentage, with 100% indicating best accuracy.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Results of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Tests Compared to Gold Standard Stratified by Ethnicity

    1 day

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Testing Stratified by Ethnicity

    1 day

Study Arms (1)

Children attending eye clinic

Children 1 month to 5 years of age attending paediatric ophthalmology clinic with and without cataracts. Children who had previously had intra-ocular surgery were excluded. One eye of each child was assessed by an inexperienced screener (medical student) by red-reflex assessment using direct ophthalmoscope and infrared-reflex using a new device (CatCam). CatCam is a modified smart phone camera which images the reflection of co-axial infrared light from the ocular fundus. A cataract appears as a black silhouette on the white infrared-reflex imaged by the camera. Sensitivity and specificity for red-reflex and infrared-reflex assessment compared to gold standard dilated ophthalmic examination by a specialised were compared.

Diagnostic Test: Red-reflex assessmentDiagnostic Test: Infrared-reflex assessment

Interventions

Red-reflex assessmentDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The red reflex was examined in the standard manner using direct ophthalmoscope by medical student examiner

Children attending eye clinic

The infrared reflex was examined using a modified smart phone camera by a medical student examiner

Children attending eye clinic

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Infants and children from 1 month to 5 years of age attending a specialist paediatric ophthalmology clinic with or without known cataracts.

You may qualify if:

  • All children between 1 month and 5 years of age attending paediatric ophthalmology clinic

You may not qualify if:

  • Parents / carers with poor conversant English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Addenbrooke's Hospital

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Rahi JS, Dezateux C. National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: role of childhood screening and surveillance. The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):362-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.362.

    PMID: 9933197BACKGROUND
  • Mndeme FG, Mmbaga BT, Kim MJ, Sinke L, Allen L, Mgaya E, Bastawrous A, MacLeod D, Burton MJ, Gilbert C, Bowman R. Red reflex examination in reproductive and child health clinics for early detection of paediatric cataract and ocular media disorders: cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy and feasibility studies from Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Eye (Lond). 2021 May;35(5):1347-1353. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1019-5. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

    PMID: 32546747BACKGROUND
  • Duret A, Humphries R, Ramanujam S, Te Water Naude A, Reid C, Allen LE. The infrared reflex: a potential new method for congenital cataract screening. Eye (Lond). 2019 Dec;33(12):1865-1870. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0509-9. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Stephen Kelleher, Director of R&D
Organization
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Study Officials

  • Louise E Allen, MD

    Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CROSSOVER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Paediatric Ophthalmologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2017

First Posted

January 30, 2017

Study Start

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2017

Study Completion

September 1, 2017

Last Updated

November 7, 2023

Results First Posted

November 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations