Lumbosciatic Syndrome: Vojta Therapy vs. TENS
Lumbosciatic Syndrome: a Quasi-experimental Study on the Effectiveness of the Vojta Therapy vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
12
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This pilot "pre-post" quasi-experimental study evaluates for the first time the effectiveness of Vojta Therapy in treating lumbosciatic and compares it with the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) procedure. Patients who agree will be distributed alternately in order of arrival to a Physiotherapy Unit, in such a way that half of the sample will be treated using TENS and the other half with Vojta.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2017
CompletedFebruary 1, 2017
January 1, 2017
5 months
January 16, 2017
January 31, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain
To quantify pain, the investigators used two aggregated measures coming independently from the Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry questionnaire. The Oswestry questionnaire has a scale both for back pain and for lower leg pain. VAS measures the intensity of pain subjectively described by the patient, with maximum reproducibility amongst observers. It consists in a graduated scale from 0 cm (extreme "no pain") to 10 cm (extreme "unbearable pain"), in which the patient establishes the point on the scale that best describes the intensity of the pain. It is universally used and relates well to descriptive scales, with good sensitivity and reliability
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Disability
1 year
Flexibility
1 year
Radiculopathy
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Vojta
OTHERVojta therapy consists in activating certain overall and innate locomotion patterns or complexes: reflex creeping and reflex rolling, which provokes the contraction of striated muscle in the entire body in a determined coordination with the central nervous system (CNS). These patterns are triggered from different positions (prone, supine and side lying) and only with certain stimulation. They contain all the locomotion components: automatic postural control, uprighting and phase movements. This therapy allows for the changing from pathological patterns to painless and cheaper patterns. This group received 15 sessions of treatment. Treatment lasted 30 minutes per sesion.
TENS
ACTIVE COMPARATORTENS procedure used at our unit consists in applying a high frequency current (80Hz), which is the most effective way to combat pain, for a phase duration of 60-200 microseconds at a comfortable range. Electrodes are placed on the skin over the sciatic nerve path, the (-) cathode on the most painful area as it is the most stimulating and the (+) another is placed distal. This group received 15 sessions of treatment. Treatment lasted 30 minutes per sesion.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with acute, sub-acute or chronic lumbosciatic by a rehabilitation doctor were referred by said doctor to the Physiotherapy Unit, as candidates for either of the therapeutical procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with lumbosciatic resulting from a specific pathology (infection, metastasis, neoplasia, osteoporosis, fracture or inflammatory arthropathy).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lidia Juarez
SESCAM
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist and clinical profesor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2017
First Posted
January 27, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01