NCT03033186

Brief Summary

Metastatic (HR-positive, HER2-negative) breast cancer (BC), advanced or unresectable neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic (pNET), gastrointestinal or lung origin and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are diseases with poor outcome. Everolimus increases patients' median progression-free survival (PFS) with 4.6 months in metastatic BC (mBC), 7 months in (p)NET and 3 months in mRCC. However, serious adverse events (AEs) occur frequently. This reduces effectiveness of everolimus, because AEs are managed with dose reductions, treatment interruptions or even complete discontinuation of everolimus. Therapeutic-drug-monitoring (TDM) is used to adjust the prescribed daily dose, to maintain effective everolimus whole blood concentrations, with the lowest possible risk of AEs. While everolimus TDM has been common in transplantation medicine, it has not been implemented in oncology. The importance of TDM in oncology is supported by previous research which showed that a 2-fold increased everolimus whole blood trough concentration was associated with a short-term risk of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis, stomatitis and metabolic events. Moreover, an exposure-toxicity relationship of everolimus in patients with thyroid cancer was observed, since initial everolimus concentrations could be associated with early toxicity (\< 12 weeks, e.g. stomatitis). However, the association between initial everolimus measurements and long-term AEs (≥12 weeks, e.g. pneumonitis, anorexia and anemia) of any grade and the need for everolimus dose reductions could not be made. Since levels ±\>18 µg/L were associated with toxicity, the investigators assume that the upper therapeutic window of everolimus in the oncologic setting will be ±18 µg/L. Similarly, a tendency to improved PFS and overall survival was observed when Cmin in steady state was above 14.1 μg/L. This seems to be the lower limit of the therapeutic window. Before consensus about the feasibility of everolimus TDM in the oncologic setting can be achieved, a number of questions (the knowledge gaps) need to be answered: 1. It is unknown whether everolimus whole blood trough levels (over time) predict long-term AEs. 2. The optimal concentration range for everolimus, with the treatment of mBC, mRCC, or (p)NET is unknown, especially the upper limit associated with toxicity. 3. It is unknown what everolimus concentration level is associated with the need for everolimus dose reductions.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

EverolimusLong term site effectsDried Blood SpotTherapeutic Drug Monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Everolimus TDM to predict long-term toxicity

    The difference in percentage of patients with a high everolimus trough level (i.e. \> 18 ng/mL) experiencing NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grade 2, 3 or 4 late AEs (i.e. toxicity reported from ≥ 12 weeks onward, e.g. pneumonitis, anorexia, anemia) compared to participants with lower trough concentrations.

    Up to 2 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Everolimus TDM to predict short-term toxicity

    Up to 2 year

  • Correlation everolimus concentration DBS from fingerprick with whole blood from venipuncture

    Up to 2 year

  • Correlation everolimus concentration DBS from fingerprick with DBS spiked with whole blood from venipuncture

    Up to 2 year

  • Everolimus TDM to predict dose reductions

    Up to 2 year

Study Arms (1)

Everolimus (afinitor)

Patients using everolimus as therapy for cancer: Advanced (Hormone-Receptor \[HR\]-positive, HER2-negative) breast cancer (BC), advanced or unresectable neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic (pNET), gastrointestinal or lung origin and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients currently treated with everolimus for any type of cancer, such as the EMA registered indications i.e. advanced (Hormone-Receptor \[HR\]-positive, HER2-negative) breast cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) or neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic (pNET), gastrointestinal or lung origin.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients currently treated with everolimus for any type of cancer, such as the EMA registered indications i.e. advanced (Hormone-Receptor \[HR\]-positive, HER2-negative) breast cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) or neuroendocrine tumour (NET) of pancreatic, gastrointestinal or lung origin.
  • Aged 18 or above
  • Able and willing to sign the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • No informed consent
  • Alactasia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Whole blood and drop of blood

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellAdenoma, Islet Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeKidney NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesAdenomaPancreatic NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • S. Croes, PharmD, PhD

    Maastricht University Medical Centre+

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

S. Croes, PharmD PhD

CONTACT

L. Knapen, PharmD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2017

First Posted

January 26, 2017

Study Start

May 16, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

May 31, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations