Ultrasound Imaging Technique in Detecting Breast Microcalcifications in Patients Undergoing Biopsy for a Breast Abnormality
Breast Microcalcifications Identified With MicroPure as a Marker for Malignancy Compared to Grayscale Ultrasound and Mammography (Using Biopsy as the Reference Standard)
2 other identifiers
interventional
85
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies a new type of ultrasound technique, MicroPure, in detecting breast microcalcifications in patients undergoing biopsy for a breast abnormality. Ultrasound sends sound waves into the body, and the sound waves reflected back are interpreted by the machine into a grayscale image. MicroPure uses a filter that adjusts the brightness and gives color to the ultrasound images, which may allow doctors to better identify microcalcifications. Microcalcifications are tiny deposits of calcium in the breast that cannot be felt but can be detected by imaging. A group of microcalcifications may indicate that cancer is present.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2017
CompletedMay 15, 2025
May 1, 2025
3.2 years
January 20, 2017
May 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound
The number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard). The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant. A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.
Baseline
Number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound
The number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard). The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant. A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of microcalcifications determined by pathology findings
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (standard ultrasound, MicroPure, biopsy)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo grayscale and MicroPure ultrasound imaging followed by sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle biopsy or surgical resection. Surgical specimens are then x-rayed.
Interventions
Undergo standard ultrasound
Undergo MicoPure ultrasound
Undergo breast biopsy or surgical resection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Give written informed consent
- Be scheduled for a sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle biopsy or surgical excision for the evaluation of a breast lesion or abnormality containing microcalcifications seen on mammography
You may not qualify if:
- Is clinically unstable, severely ill, or moribund
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flemming Forsberg, PhD
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2017
First Posted
January 25, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 30, 2015
Study Completion
March 10, 2016
Last Updated
May 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05