Safety and Efficacy of 2 Concentrations of Lubricin vs Sodium Hyaluronate in Ocular Discomfort After Refractive Surgery.
A 2 Weeks, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study to Assess Tolerability, Safety, Permanence on the Ocular Surface, Efficacy of Lubricin (20 and 50 μg/ml) vs Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18% in Ocular Discomfort Following Refractive Surgery.
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate tolerability, safety, permanence on the ocular surface and efficacy of Lubricin (20 and 50 μg/mL) eye drops vs Sodium Hyaluronate (Vismed®) 0.18% eye drops in patients with ocular discomfort following refractive surgery. Primary objectives:
- Tolerability using a Visual analogue scale (VAS) for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia;
- Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed throughout the study. Secondary objectives:
- Ocular surface vital staining with Fluorescein (Oxford scale)
- Schirmer-I test (without anaesthesia);
- Permanence of Lubricin on the Ocular Surface Tear film break-up time (TFBUT);
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA);
- SANDE questionnaire scores - discomfort improvement entity;
- SANDE questionnaire scores - discomfort improvement speed;
- Signs evaluated by Slit lamp examination (SLE) (blepharitis, eyelid hyperemia/oedema, lashes, conjunctiva hyperemia);
- Intraocular pressure (IOP) ;
- Corneal sensitivity by Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometry. All parameters were evaluated at V1 (Day 1 - Baseline), V2 (Day 15±2) and V3 (Day 22±2/ETV).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 6, 2024
CompletedDecember 6, 2024
October 1, 2024
2 months
January 23, 2017
January 5, 2024
October 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes From Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) in Ocular Tolerability Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
A global ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on which 0 meant no symptoms and 100 meant the worst possible discomfort. This evaluation was to be performed before any ophtalmic assessment at each scheduled visit. Specific ocular symptoms measured with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. The patients evaluated their symptoms using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The VAS scale was a straight horizontal line of fixed length (100 mm). The ends were defined as extreme limits of the parameter.
Day 1 (baseline = Visit 1) at pre-dose, 15, 30 min post-dose; Day 15±2 (= Visit 2) at pre-dose, 15, 30 min post-dose; Day 22±2 (= Visit 3)
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Assessed Throughout the Study
TEAEs included all AEs occurring or worsening after the first dose of IMD. These comprise AEs during the treatment and follow-up period. For TEAE, the number of events was provided. At each visit (Visit 1 which took place at Day 1; Visit 2 which took place at day 15 ± 2; Visit 3, i.e. final visi FU, at Day 22 ± 2/ETV), patients could spontaneously report any physical or medical occurrence and the investigator or designee inquired about the occurrence of TEAEs by asking specific questions. Any untoward (unfavorable \& unintended) change in subject's medical conditions was to be reported as an AE. Changes in any protocol-specific ocular or systemic parameter evaluated during the study were to be reviewed by the investigator. In addition, each patient's response to any questionnaire was to be reviewed by the investigator. Any untoward (unfavorable and unintended) change in a protocol-specific parameter or questionnaire response clinically relevant was to be reported as an AE.
From baseline (Day 1 - pre-dose) to day 22±2
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining With Fluorescein (Oxford Scale)
Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)
Change From Baseline in Schirmer-I Test (Without Anaesthesia)
Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)
Change From Baseline in Permanence of Lubricin on the Ocular Surface - Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)
Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) - ETDRS Score
Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)
Change From Baseline in SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) Questionnaire Scores
Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Lubricin 20µg/ml
EXPERIMENTALLubricin 20µg/ml eye drops solution Test investigational device was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.
Lubricin 50µg/ml
EXPERIMENTALLubricin 50µg/ml eye drops solution Test investigational device was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.
Sodium hyaluronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORVismed® 0.18% Sodium hyaluronate (HA) eye drops Comparator was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.
Interventions
Sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% eye drops
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years of age or older;
- Patients undergone ocular refractive surgery within 6 months from V1 - Day 1;
- Patients with ocular discomfort defined as SANDE score ≥ 30 at baseline;
- Average VAS score (dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm;
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≥ 0.1 decimal units in both eyes at the time of study enrolment;
- Only patients who satisfy all Informed Consent requirements may be included in the study. The patient and/or his/her legal representative must read, sign and date the Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures are performed. The Informed Consent form signed by patients and/or legal representative must have been approved by the Ethics Committee for the current study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a severe Dry Eye condition (severity level 4 according to the Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop -DEWS, 2007);
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of \< 0.1 decimal units in either eye at the time of study enrolment;
- Evidence of an active ocular infection in either eye;
- History or presence of ocular surface disorders other than ocular discomfort in either eye;
- Use of any ocular topical medication other than the study medications for the treatment of ocular diseases including artificial tears during the study period;
- Use of topical cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids or any other topical medication for the treatment of dry eye in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment;
- History of any ocular surgery (excluding laser or refractive surgical procedures) in either eye within 30 days before study enrolment. Ocular surgery will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period;
- Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications;
- Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 90 days of screening/baseline visit;
- History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction;
- Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:
- are currently pregnant or,
- have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening/Baseline Visit or,
- intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
- are breast-feeding or,
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dipartimento "Organi di senso" Università La Sapienza- Policlinico Umberto I
Rome, 00161, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development & Operations
- Organization
- Dompé Farmaceutici SpA
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Flavio Mantelli, MD-PhD
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The packaging used for the comparator in the present investigation aimed at ensuring a complete masking of the test IMD.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2017
First Posted
January 25, 2017
Study Start
June 17, 2017
Primary Completion
August 10, 2017
Study Completion
August 10, 2017
Last Updated
December 6, 2024
Results First Posted
December 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share