NCT03031327

Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate tolerability, safety, permanence on the ocular surface and efficacy of Lubricin (20 and 50 μg/mL) eye drops vs Sodium Hyaluronate (Vismed®) 0.18% eye drops in patients with ocular discomfort following refractive surgery. Primary objectives:

  • Tolerability using a Visual analogue scale (VAS) for dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia;
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed throughout the study. Secondary objectives:
  • Ocular surface vital staining with Fluorescein (Oxford scale)
  • Schirmer-I test (without anaesthesia);
  • Permanence of Lubricin on the Ocular Surface Tear film break-up time (TFBUT);
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA);
  • SANDE questionnaire scores - discomfort improvement entity;
  • SANDE questionnaire scores - discomfort improvement speed;
  • Signs evaluated by Slit lamp examination (SLE) (blepharitis, eyelid hyperemia/oedema, lashes, conjunctiva hyperemia);
  • Intraocular pressure (IOP) ;
  • Corneal sensitivity by Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometry. All parameters were evaluated at V1 (Day 1 - Baseline), V2 (Day 15±2) and V3 (Day 22±2/ETV).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 23, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 10, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2017

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 6, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 6, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 23, 2017

Results QC Date

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Ocular Discomfort Following Refractive SurgeryRefractive Surgerysodium hyaluronateHAVismed®Lubricin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes From Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) in Ocular Tolerability Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    A global ocular tolerability score was determined using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on which 0 meant no symptoms and 100 meant the worst possible discomfort. This evaluation was to be performed before any ophtalmic assessment at each scheduled visit. Specific ocular symptoms measured with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. The patients evaluated their symptoms using the VAS giving the value they were feeling from none to an extreme value. The VAS scale was a straight horizontal line of fixed length (100 mm). The ends were defined as extreme limits of the parameter.

    Day 1 (baseline = Visit 1) at pre-dose, 15, 30 min post-dose; Day 15±2 (= Visit 2) at pre-dose, 15, 30 min post-dose; Day 22±2 (= Visit 3)

  • Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Assessed Throughout the Study

    TEAEs included all AEs occurring or worsening after the first dose of IMD. These comprise AEs during the treatment and follow-up period. For TEAE, the number of events was provided. At each visit (Visit 1 which took place at Day 1; Visit 2 which took place at day 15 ± 2; Visit 3, i.e. final visi FU, at Day 22 ± 2/ETV), patients could spontaneously report any physical or medical occurrence and the investigator or designee inquired about the occurrence of TEAEs by asking specific questions. Any untoward (unfavorable \& unintended) change in subject's medical conditions was to be reported as an AE. Changes in any protocol-specific ocular or systemic parameter evaluated during the study were to be reviewed by the investigator. In addition, each patient's response to any questionnaire was to be reviewed by the investigator. Any untoward (unfavorable and unintended) change in a protocol-specific parameter or questionnaire response clinically relevant was to be reported as an AE.

    From baseline (Day 1 - pre-dose) to day 22±2

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Vital Staining With Fluorescein (Oxford Scale)

    Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)

  • Change From Baseline in Schirmer-I Test (Without Anaesthesia)

    Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)

  • Change From Baseline in Permanence of Lubricin on the Ocular Surface - Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)

    Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)

  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) - ETDRS Score

    Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)

  • Change From Baseline in SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) Questionnaire Scores

    Day 15±2 (Visit 2); Day 22±2 (Visit 3)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Lubricin 20µg/ml

EXPERIMENTAL

Lubricin 20µg/ml eye drops solution Test investigational device was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.

Device: Lubricin 20µg/ml

Lubricin 50µg/ml

EXPERIMENTAL

Lubricin 50µg/ml eye drops solution Test investigational device was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.

Device: Lubricin 50µg/ml

Sodium hyaluronate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vismed® 0.18% Sodium hyaluronate (HA) eye drops Comparator was instilled t.i.d. (three times a day) approximately every 6 h, from day 1 to day 15±2. All the patients instilled their assigned IMD into both eyes, unless only one eye met the eligibility criteria. If just one eye met the eligibility criteria, that was identified as the "Study/Primary eye". If both eyes met the eligibility criteria, the worst one (highest VAS average score) was chosen as "Study/Primary eye". In the event that the mean VAS score was equal in both eyes, right eye was to be chosen as "Study/Primary eye". The investigator instilled the morning study dose on Day 1 then the patients self-instilled the drops at home/site, as applicable. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects could use any ocular topical treatment allowed, including other artificial tears/lubricants as prescribed by the treating physician, from day 15±2 to day 21±2.

Device: Sodium hyaluronate 0.18%

Interventions

Lubricin 20µg/ml eye drops

Lubricin 20µg/ml

Lubricin 50µg/ml eye drops

Lubricin 50µg/ml

Sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% eye drops

Also known as: Vismed®
Sodium hyaluronate

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years of age or older;
  • Patients undergone ocular refractive surgery within 6 months from V1 - Day 1;
  • Patients with ocular discomfort defined as SANDE score ≥ 30 at baseline;
  • Average VAS score (dryness, foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia) ≥ 25 mm;
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≥ 0.1 decimal units in both eyes at the time of study enrolment;
  • Only patients who satisfy all Informed Consent requirements may be included in the study. The patient and/or his/her legal representative must read, sign and date the Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures are performed. The Informed Consent form signed by patients and/or legal representative must have been approved by the Ethics Committee for the current study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a severe Dry Eye condition (severity level 4 according to the Report of the International Dry Eye Workshop -DEWS, 2007);
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of \< 0.1 decimal units in either eye at the time of study enrolment;
  • Evidence of an active ocular infection in either eye;
  • History or presence of ocular surface disorders other than ocular discomfort in either eye;
  • Use of any ocular topical medication other than the study medications for the treatment of ocular diseases including artificial tears during the study period;
  • Use of topical cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids or any other topical medication for the treatment of dry eye in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment;
  • History of any ocular surgery (excluding laser or refractive surgical procedures) in either eye within 30 days before study enrolment. Ocular surgery will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period;
  • Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications;
  • Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 90 days of screening/baseline visit;
  • History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction;
  • Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:
  • are currently pregnant or,
  • have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening/Baseline Visit or,
  • intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
  • are breast-feeding or,
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dipartimento "Organi di senso" Università La Sapienza- Policlinico Umberto I

Rome, 00161, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Jacobs syndrome

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Development & Operations
Organization
Dompé Farmaceutici SpA

Study Officials

  • Flavio Mantelli, MD-PhD

    Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The packaging used for the comparator in the present investigation aimed at ensuring a complete masking of the test IMD.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2017

First Posted

January 25, 2017

Study Start

June 17, 2017

Primary Completion

August 10, 2017

Study Completion

August 10, 2017

Last Updated

December 6, 2024

Results First Posted

December 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations