AMPLEX Ankle Fusion and Hindfoot
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Pivotal Study Evaluating AMPLEX Compared To Autogenous Bone Graft in Subjects Indicated for Arthrodesis Surgery Involving the Hindfoot or Ankle
2 other identifiers
interventional
56
2 countries
36
Brief Summary
To demonstrate that AMPLEX is non-inferior to autogenous bone graft (ABG) for bone fusion in a population indicated for single, double, or triple hindfoot arthrodesis or ankle arthrodesis surgery with supplemental graft material.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
36 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 11, 2021
CompletedMarch 11, 2021
August 1, 2020
2.5 years
January 19, 2017
January 8, 2021
February 17, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Subjects Who Met All Five Criteria for Subject Performance Composite (SPC) Endpoint
Proportion of subjects who met all the following criteria for the SPC endpoint at 52 weeks: 1. Improvement in pain on weight-bearing at fusion site (≥20 mm reduction from baseline on 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); 2. Absence of significant graft harvest site pain (\<20 mm on 100 mm VAS); 3. Improvement in Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living subscale (FAAM-ADL) (≥8 points improvement from baseline); 4. Absence of device related or procedure related serious adverse events (up to week 52); 5. Absence of secondary surgical or nonsurgical interventions intended to promote fusion (up to week 52). The last observation carried forward was used for subjects with missing response status at 52 weeks.
At week 52
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Proportion of Subjects Achieving Computerized Tomography (CT) Radiographic Fusion Success
At week 52
Proportion of Subjects Achieving CT Radiographic Fusion Success
At week 12
Proportion of Subjects Achieving CT Radiographic Fusion Success
At week 24
Proportion of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Pain on Weight-bearing at Fusion Site (>20 mm Reduction From Baseline on 100 mm VAS)
Baseline, and at week 12
Proportion of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Pain on Weight-bearing at Fusion Site (>20 mm Reduction From Baseline on 100 mm VAS)
Baseline, and at week 24
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AMPLEX
EXPERIMENTALAutogenous Bone Graft (ABG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Control material administered by surgical implant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed written informed consent
- Indicated for ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis and require one of the following arthrodesis procedures:
- Tibiotalar (ankle); Talocalcaneal (subtalar); Talonavicular; Calcaneocuboid; Double hindfoot (e.g., talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints); Triple hindfoot (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
- Presents with pain on weight-bearing of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS at the area indicated for arthrodesis
- Presents with at least one comorbid risk factors that warrant the use of supplemental autogenous bone or allograft:
- Radiographic evidence of bone defect, deficit, subsidence or subchondral cyst; More than one joint to be fused; Involvement of other adjacent or nonadjacent joints; Large surface area; Intra-articular or extra-articular deformity; Post-traumatic arthritis; Diagnosis of osteoporosis
- The Investigator determines if the joint space(s) can be adequately filled with graft material (AMPLEX or ABG) according to the following parameters:
- Single hindfoot joint fusion: up to 5 cm\^3; Double or triple hindfoot fusion: each individual joint up to 5 cm\^3, but overall, not more than 10 cm3 for the full complement of joints; Ankle fusion: up to 10 cm\^3
- Each fused joint can be rigidly stabilized with with at least 1 and no more than 3 screws across the fusion plane. (Supplemental pins and staples may be used, as well as supplemental screws and plates external to the fusion site(s))
- Willing and able to comply with all study requirements including all postoperative clinical and radiographic evaluations
- For women of childbearing potential (not post-menopausal for 12 months or surgically sterile), a urine pregnancy test with a negative result must be obtained at screening and within 24 hours prior to procedure. These trial participants must commit to adequate birth control (e.g., oral contraceptive, two methods of barrier birth control, or abstinence) through the 78 week follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Bone deficit requiring a structural graft
- Charcot foot disease
- Radiographic evidence of open physes
- Prior arthroplasty, arthrodesis, major surgical repair or reconstruction of the index ankle or hindfoot joint(s)
- Requires osteotomy or fusion of the midfoot joints
- BMI greater than 45 kg/m\^2
- Documented medical history of, or radiographic evidence of, a bone disease (e.g. avascular necrosis) or other condition (e.g., osteolysis) that would preclude the subject from receiving screw fixation in the opinion of the surgeon
- Requires intramedullary nail fixation or an external fixator
- Comorbidity that would limit the ability to administer any functional measurements such as FAAM-ADL
- Has at the time of surgery, a systemic infection or local infection at the site of surgery
- Medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude participation in the study or potentially decrease survival or interfere with ambulation or rehabilitation (e.g., history of transient ischemic attack, stroke or liver disease)
- HgbA1c level greater than or equal to 8%
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the product \[e.g. B2A peptide, Hydroxyapatite (HA): beta-tricalcium phosphate (βTCP), ceramic granule\]
- Currently receiving treatment with a drug known to interfere with bone metabolism \[e.g., systemic corticosteroid therapy (topical corticosteroid therapy is permissible), methotrexate\]
- Has previously received treatment with a drug known to interfere with bone metabolism \[e.g., systemic corticosteroid therapy (topical corticosteroid therapy is permissible), methotrexate\] and in the opinion of the investigator could continue to negatively interfere with bone metabolism or bone healing
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (36)
Physician Research Group
Gilbert, Arizona, 85295, United States
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053, United States
California Pacific Orthopaedics
San Francisco, California, 94118, United States
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Andrews Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center
Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561, United States
Emory Orthopaedic and Spine Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Midwest Orthopedics at Rush
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc / Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, United States
Medstar
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Research and Education Institute
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525, United States
Michigan Orthopedic Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48910, United States
TRIA Orthopaedic Center
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55431, United States
Desert Orthopaedic Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Rutgers
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
University of Rochester School of Medicine
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106, United States
Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States
Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0165, United States
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79430, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
University of Alberta System
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Central Alberta Orthopedics
Red Deer, Alberta, T4N 6S4, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1R6, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
University of Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G2, Canada
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Clinical Compliance
- Organization
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Global Clinical Compliance
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2017
First Posted
January 23, 2017
Study Start
July 28, 2017
Primary Completion
January 9, 2020
Study Completion
July 9, 2020
Last Updated
March 11, 2021
Results First Posted
March 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-08