One vs. Two Hand Use After Stroke: Role of Task Requirements

NCT03025776 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: IRB-FY2016-332
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 48
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

To further develop interventions, the investigators need a better understanding of which task requirements (i.e. size or weight of object, location in workspace, etc.) drive a person after stroke to use 2 hands (as opposed to 1), and how the severity of their injury impacts this relationship and compare this to reaching in age-matched healthy controls subjects. A better understanding of this relationship will promote more informed development of rehabilitative interventions. This study proposes to explore in people after stroke and healthy controls: i.) how specific functional tasks requirements relate to 1 vs. 2 handed use, and ii.) how stroke severity impacts this arm use. We are proposing to study 15 individuals more than 6 months after stroke in the CSU Motor Behavior Lab for a two x 3 hour session of task-related reaching in sitting and 33 age matched (double sample size) healthy controls. The investigators will systematically vary task requirements (i.e. object size or weight, location in workspace, etc.), and record use of 1 versus 2 hands using videotaping as well as recording of quality of arm movement (kinematics) and muscle activity (EMG) in both arms.

Conditions

Stroke

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Hand Use (qualitative analysis of how many hands, which hand used) via video

  within 1st day session only (assessed w/i 2-3 hour session only)

• upper extremity kinematics (peak velocity, index of curvature, total movement time)

  measured on Day 2 session using electromagnetic sensors

  within 2nd day session only (assessed w/i 2-3 hour session only)

Study Arms (2)

stroke

individuals chronic (\> 6 months) post-stroke

Behavioral: Reaching; Behavioral: Kinematic collection while reaching

age matched health controls

age matched (double sample size anticipated) healthy controls

Behavioral: Reaching

Interventions

Reaching BEHAVIORAL

sitting reaching under various task conditions (size, speed, location)

age matched health controls; stroke

Kinematic collection while reaching BEHAVIORAL

sitting reaching under various task conditions (size, speed, location), told how many \& which hand to use, kinematic data collected

stroke

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

adults \> 18 years old chronic post-stroke with upper extremity paresis yet able to complete a reach-to-grasp task independently with their paretic arm healthy controls \> 18 years old (as per above)

You may qualify if:

• subjects post-stroke
• passive flexibility (i.e. passive range of motion) in both arms such that the elbows can be straightened within 15 degrees of normal and shoulders be flexed (lifted up) at least 90 degrees and the hand needs to be able to open at least 75% of the way
• Actively (of each subject's own accord/ability) they must be able to, without assist in sitting and standing: straighten each elbow within 15 degrees of full range of motion, lift each arm up at at least 60 degrees from at the side, open each hand from a gross grasp volitionally.
• able to lift a glass jar using 1 or 2 hands in sitting and standing 10" above the table top.
• able to come to CSU for two x 3 hour visits with or without assistance of their caregiver/significant other
• No arm/hand injury within the last 3 months. \* Individuals with common visual deficits post-stroke (1 side partial visual field cut aka homonymous hemianopsia) will be included.
• Healthy controls:
• age matched (double sample size); no known injury to arms within last 3 months, able to carry out experimental task, no neurologic diagnoses/perceptual or sensory deficits affecting arm movement

You may not qualify if:

• Individuals who have any additional/other neurologic condition (i.e. Parkinsons Disease, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury)
• severe perceptual neglect (tested using clock drawing test ).
• Any individual who cannot answer phone screen questions competently and/or follow simple 2 step commands during the in-person screen

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cleveland State University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland State University

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 14, 2016
• First Posted: January 20, 2017
• Study Start: September 1, 2016
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2017
• Study Completion: December 1, 2017
• Last Updated: January 29, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations

US (1)