Can Prophylactic Foraminotomy Prevent C5 Palsy
A Randomized, Prospective Study Determining the Impact of Prophylactic Bilateral Foraminotomy During Cervical Decompression on C5 Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
480
1 country
1
Brief Summary
C5 palsy (C5P) is a well-known, although rare complication of cervical spine decompression surgery. In severe forms, C5P causes debilitating upper extremity weakness involving the deltoids and/or biceps brachii muscles, ultimately diminishing these patients' quality of life. Furthermore, about half of patients with C5P present with sensory deficits and/or intractable pain in addition to the muscle weakness. Prophylactic bilateral foraminotomy at the C5 level during cervical decompression surgery has been studied recently with the hope that it will minimize the risk of developing a C5 nerve root palsy postoperatively. Although the current literature provides some support for this claim, there are insufficient data establishing this technique as a proven measure to reduce the incidence of C5P. In the present study, we seek to evaluate the effect of bilateral foraminotomy on postoperative C5P incidence rates. Bilateral foraminotomy has been correlated with a reduced risk of developing C5P following cervical decompression surgery, but an identical foraminotomy procedure has never been applied in a randomized manner to all qualifying patients in a study. Additionally, prophylactic foraminotomy has only been prospectively studied during laminoplasty. In the proposed study, bilateral foraminotomy will be randomized to patients receiving cervical decompression surgery (laminoplasty, laminectomy, fusion). This is a multicenter randomized trial, including the following sites: Cleveland Clinic, Columbia University Medical Center, and University of Southern California Spine Center. Patients undergoing cervical decompression surgery will be consented and enrolled if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, incidence of C5P will be monitored to determine efficacy of prophylactic C5 bilateral foraminotomy during cervical decompression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
January 22, 2026
January 1, 2026
10.5 years
January 13, 2017
January 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
C5 Palsy
Using manual muscle testing and upper extremity sensory exam findings to determine C5 palsy status. C5P is defined as: a reduction of at least 1 in deltoid and/or biceps brachii manual muscle testing scores compared to preoperative scores, without any deterioration of myelopathic symptoms.
Upon discharge, 2 weeks postoperatively and 3 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Preoperative anatomic measurements
Preoperative
Operative time
Intra-operative measurement
Blood loss
Intra-operative measurement
Back Pain
Preoperative, 2 weeks postoperative and 3 months postoperative
Leg Pain
Preoperative, 2 weeks postoperative and 3 months postoperative
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Foraminotomy Group
EXPERIMENTALProphylactic bilateral cervical keyhole foraminotomy will be done in addition to their decompression surgery
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORCervical decompression will be done without prophylactic bilateral foraminotomy
Interventions
Cervical decompression for myelopathy, including the following procedures: laminoplasty, laminectomy, discectomy and fusion
Under microscopic or loop magnification, a high-speed burr is used to perform the foraminotomy. The keyhole foraminotomy begins at the lamina-facet junction, with careful consideration of the amount of facet resection. Typically, only the medial one third is drilled. Then a 1- or 2-mm Kerrison punch can be carefully placed over the nerve root and then used to undercut the facet, ensuring that the spine is not destabilized by the foraminotomy. The amount of facet resection must not exceed 50% in order to preserve spine stability.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cleveland Clinic patients who have been diagnosed with cervical myelopathy, without radiculopathy, and will undergo posterior cervical decompression involving the C4-C5 interspace between 2016 and 2018. This includes patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy and fusion.
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient younger than 18 years of age will not be included on the basis of skeletal immaturity. Patients with C5 radiculopathy - defined in our study as the existence of preoperative deltoid muscle weakness in grade 3 or less by MMT - will be excluded. Any patients who have undergone previous cervical spine surgery, or who have any spinal malignancy, trauma or infection will be excluded in order to eliminate the confounding effect of multiple surgical interventions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (8)
Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1443-7; discussion 1448. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00011.
PMID: 11458148BACKGROUNDEpstein NE, Hollingsworth R. C5 Nerve root palsies following cervical spine surgery: A review. Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 7;6(Suppl 4):S154-63. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156556. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26005577BACKGROUNDMiller JA, Lubelski D, Alvin MD, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression and fusion: cost and quality-of-life implications. Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.038. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PMID: 24704502BACKGROUNDSakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 1;28(21):2447-51. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F.
PMID: 14595162BACKGROUNDKatsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Shoji H. Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 20;37(9):748-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326957.
PMID: 21912316BACKGROUNDKomagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K, Ikegami H, Tanaka S, Imakiire A. Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminoplasty by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.022.
PMID: 15541697BACKGROUNDSasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, Kato I, Ohnari H, Iida H. Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 1;28(17):1972-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083237.94535.46.
PMID: 12973145BACKGROUNDLubelski D, Derakhshan A, Nowacki AS, Wang JC, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Predicting C5 palsy via the use of preoperative anatomic measurements. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.038. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
PMID: 24225009BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas E Mroz, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Institute Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2017
First Posted
January 18, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share