Study of the QOL Evaluation of Trelagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
TRENDS
3 other identifiers
interventional
219
1 country
27
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the reduction in treatment burden during 12 weeks of trelagliptin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
27 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 21, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2019
CompletedDecember 22, 2023
December 1, 2023
8 months
January 5, 2017
October 19, 2018
December 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the Diabetes Therapy Related -QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire at the End of Study
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 1: Burden on Social Activities and Daily Activities] at Each Assessment Time Point
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 2: Anxiety and Dissatisfaction With Treatments] at Each Assessment Time Point
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 3: Hypoglycemia] at Each Assessment Time Point
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 4: Satisfaction With Treatment] at Each Assessment Time Point
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at Each Assessment Time Point
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Trelagliptin
EXPERIMENTALTrelagliptin 100 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks. Trelagliptin 50 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks in patients with moderate renal impairment.
Daily DPP-4 inhibitors
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn inhibitor orally administered at the dosage and administration in the package inserts for each drug, for up to 12 weeks.
Interventions
Alogliptin, anagliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, teneligliptin or vildagliptin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants diagnosed as type 2 diabetes.
- Participants with a stable diet and exercise therapy only for at least 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening period.
- Participants who require a DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.
- Participants with Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \>=6.5 % and \<10.0 % at the start of the screening period.
- Participants who completed DTR-QOL questionnaire at the start of the screening period.
- Participants who have received less than 2 types of medication for treatment of comorbidities (such as hypertension or dyslipidemia) at the start of the screening period (any number of daily doses).
- Participants who, in the opinion of the principal investigator or the investigator, are capable of understanding the content of the clinical study and complying with the study protocol requirements.
- Participants who can provide the written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- Participants aged \>=20 years at the time of informed consent.
- Outpatient.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who are receiving any oral anti-diabetic medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes at the start of the screening period.
- Participants diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
- Participants with severe renal impairment or renal failure (e.g., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 or on dialysis).
- Participants with serious heart disease or cerebrovascular disorder, or serious pancreatic, blood, or other disease.
- Participants with a history of gastrointestinal resection.
- Participant with a proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
- Participant with malignancy.
- Participants with a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to DPP-4 inhibitors.
- Pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the study period.
- Participants who may need to add or discontinue concomitant medication or change the dose during the study period.
- Participants who will require treatment with a prohibited concomitant medication during the study period.
- Participants participating in other clinical studies.
- Participants assessed ineligible in the study by the principal investigator or the investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (27)
Takeda Selected Site 17
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 18
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 25
Obata, Gunma, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 9
Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 27
Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 14
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 11
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 10
Yamato, Kanagawa, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 4
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 5
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 3
Kashihara, Nara, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 15
Kashihara, Osaka, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 1
Suita, Osaka, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 24
Okegawa, Saitama, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 26
Oyama, Tochigi, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 23
Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 6
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 7
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 22
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 19
Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 21
Ōta-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 12
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 13
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 20
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 2
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 8
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Takeda Selected Site 16
Osaka, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Ishii H, Suzaki Y, Miyata Y, Matsui S. Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor. Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1369-1380. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
PMID: 31214997DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda (Note: This product was divested to Teijin Pharma Limited in 2023)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2017
First Posted
January 9, 2017
Study Start
February 18, 2017
Primary Completion
October 21, 2017
Study Completion
October 21, 2017
Last Updated
December 22, 2023
Results First Posted
February 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.