NCT03011216

Brief Summary

The present study examines whether a computerized cognitive control training as compared to a placebo (fake) training will reduce the frequency of depressive rumination in depressed individuals. Rumination has been identified as a major risk factor for the onset and recurrence of depressive episodes and it has been suggested that it is linked to deficits in cognitive control functions. It is thus expected that training cognitive control will reduce the frequency of rumination as well as ameliorate its detrimental effect on negative mood states.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable depression

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2016

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in rumination frequency in daily life

    Rumination frequency is measured by 2 items in the ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment is employed for 7 days pre-training, 7 days post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and 7 days at 3-months follow-up with 8 prompts per day during each assessment period

    from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up

  • Change in the impact of daily rumination on daily mood

    The impact of rumination on mood is assessed as the effect of rumination at time t on depressed and positive mood at time t+1 in a multi level model; Time t refers to consecutive assessment points in the ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment is employed for 7 days pre-training, 7 days post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and 7 days at 3-months follow-up with 8 prompts per day during each assessment period. Rumination frequency is assessed by two items; depressed and positive mood are each assessed by the average score of two items.

    from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in the ability to update emotional material in working memory

    from pre-training to post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase)

  • Change in depressed mood and depressive symptoms

    from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up

  • Change in levels of disability

    from pre-training to post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase)

Study Arms (2)

Adaptive emotional cognitive control training

EXPERIMENTAL

Adaptive emotional n-back task: On each trial of this task, participants are presented with an emotional facial expression. Participants have to indicate whether the emotion presented in the current trial is the same as n trials back. In order to train participants at their individual ability level, the n-level varies by trial block based on participants' performance on the previous block. The adaptive emotional n-back task is assumed to train the ability to continuously update emotional material in working memory.

Behavioral: Adaptive emotional cognitive control training

Placebo training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Adaptive non-emotional feature match task: On each trial of this task, participants are presented with two panels containing 8-12 shapes each. Participants are asked to compare the two panels and decide whether or not they are identical. The panels contain a minimum of 8 shapes and a maximum of 12 shapes, depending on participants' performance on the previous block. The adaptive non-emotional feature match task is assumed to train the speed of responding (involving processes like visual search and concentration). It does not trait working memory updating.

Behavioral: Adaptive non-emotional feature match task

Interventions

Is supposed to train ability to continuously update emotional material in working memory.

Adaptive emotional cognitive control training

Does not train updating of working memory content; may train reaction time speed, visual search, or concentration abilities.

Placebo training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) criteria for a current major depressive episode
  • years of age
  • German native language (due to verbal task requirements)

You may not qualify if:

  • life time diagnosis of any bipolar or psychotic disorder, or substance dependence
  • substance use disorder within past 12 months
  • current obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or borderline personality disorder (BPS)
  • reporting severe underweight (BMI\<18), any neurological disease, severe head injury (e.g. severe concussion), or any brain damage (e.g. due to stroke)
  • concurrent psychotherapy during the duration of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Freie Universität Berlin

Berlin, 14195, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Ulrike Zetsche, Dr.

    Freie Universität Berlin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. rer. nat.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2016

First Posted

January 5, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

September 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-individualized data files will be uploaded on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/) when publications are being prepared

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
De-individualized data files and the analytic code for each publication will be uploaded on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/) when the respective publication is prepared. The osf link will be made public as soon as the publication appears online.The data will be accessible as long as osf exists.
Access Criteria
There are no access criteria for reading the code and data. However, if a researcher wants to use the data for further analyses, the researcher has to notify the authors and ask for permission.

Locations