Effects of Online Cognitive Control Training on Rumination and Depressive Symptoms
"Ein Training Kognitiver Kontrolle Emotionaler Inhalte im Arbeitsgedächtnis: Effekte Auf Die Häufigkeit Und Auswirkungen Von Grübeln Bei Depressiven Patienten" (English: Training Cognitive Control Over Emotional Information in Working Memory: Effects on the Frequency of Rumination and Its Impact on Mood in the Daily Lives of Depressed Patients)
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study examines whether a computerized cognitive control training as compared to a placebo (fake) training will reduce the frequency of depressive rumination in depressed individuals. Rumination has been identified as a major risk factor for the onset and recurrence of depressive episodes and it has been suggested that it is linked to deficits in cognitive control functions. It is thus expected that training cognitive control will reduce the frequency of rumination as well as ameliorate its detrimental effect on negative mood states.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable depression
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedAugust 1, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.2 years
December 19, 2016
July 27, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in rumination frequency in daily life
Rumination frequency is measured by 2 items in the ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment is employed for 7 days pre-training, 7 days post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and 7 days at 3-months follow-up with 8 prompts per day during each assessment period
from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up
Change in the impact of daily rumination on daily mood
The impact of rumination on mood is assessed as the effect of rumination at time t on depressed and positive mood at time t+1 in a multi level model; Time t refers to consecutive assessment points in the ambulatory assessment. The ambulatory assessment is employed for 7 days pre-training, 7 days post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and 7 days at 3-months follow-up with 8 prompts per day during each assessment period. Rumination frequency is assessed by two items; depressed and positive mood are each assessed by the average score of two items.
from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in the ability to update emotional material in working memory
from pre-training to post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase)
Change in depressed mood and depressive symptoms
from 7-day assessment at pre-training (baseline) to (a) 7-day assessment at post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase), and (b) 7-day assessment at 3-months follow-up
Change in levels of disability
from pre-training to post-training (within a week after the end of the training phase)
Study Arms (2)
Adaptive emotional cognitive control training
EXPERIMENTALAdaptive emotional n-back task: On each trial of this task, participants are presented with an emotional facial expression. Participants have to indicate whether the emotion presented in the current trial is the same as n trials back. In order to train participants at their individual ability level, the n-level varies by trial block based on participants' performance on the previous block. The adaptive emotional n-back task is assumed to train the ability to continuously update emotional material in working memory.
Placebo training
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdaptive non-emotional feature match task: On each trial of this task, participants are presented with two panels containing 8-12 shapes each. Participants are asked to compare the two panels and decide whether or not they are identical. The panels contain a minimum of 8 shapes and a maximum of 12 shapes, depending on participants' performance on the previous block. The adaptive non-emotional feature match task is assumed to train the speed of responding (involving processes like visual search and concentration). It does not trait working memory updating.
Interventions
Is supposed to train ability to continuously update emotional material in working memory.
Does not train updating of working memory content; may train reaction time speed, visual search, or concentration abilities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) criteria for a current major depressive episode
- years of age
- German native language (due to verbal task requirements)
You may not qualify if:
- life time diagnosis of any bipolar or psychotic disorder, or substance dependence
- substance use disorder within past 12 months
- current obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or borderline personality disorder (BPS)
- reporting severe underweight (BMI\<18), any neurological disease, severe head injury (e.g. severe concussion), or any brain damage (e.g. due to stroke)
- concurrent psychotherapy during the duration of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Freie Universität Berlinlead
- University of Stuttgartcollaborator
- University Ghentcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Freie Universität Berlin
Berlin, 14195, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrike Zetsche, Dr.
Freie Universität Berlin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. rer. nat.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2016
First Posted
January 5, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
August 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- De-individualized data files and the analytic code for each publication will be uploaded on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/) when the respective publication is prepared. The osf link will be made public as soon as the publication appears online.The data will be accessible as long as osf exists.
- Access Criteria
- There are no access criteria for reading the code and data. However, if a researcher wants to use the data for further analyses, the researcher has to notify the authors and ask for permission.
De-individualized data files will be uploaded on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/) when publications are being prepared