A Study of Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty at a Regional Hospital in Denmark
A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty at a Regional Hospital in Denmark
1 other identifier
observational
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project will be a descriptive, hypothesis-generating study. The aim is to identify risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes in order to optimise appropriate rehabilitations strategies and rationalising the distribution of health care resources.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 5, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.4 years
September 9, 2016
January 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30 second chair stand test, to test the patients functional capacity
Change of 30 second chair stand test from baseline to follow up (an average of 3 months)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Change of health-related quality of life questionnaire from baseline to follow up (an average of 3 months)
Pain catastrophizing scale questionnaire
Change of pain catastrophizing scale questionnaire from baseline to follow up (an average of 3 months)
Use of analgesics and other medication, qualitative assessment
Changes in the use og analgesics and other medication from baseline to follow up (an average of 3 months)
Fall history, events as numbers of falls described by the patient
Change within the fall history from baseline to follow up (an average of 3 months)
Patient expectations questionnaire
Preoperative (an average 3 weeks before surgery)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
Rehabilitation, observational. Identification of risk factors for poor response to rehabilitation programs after TJR and use these to identify patients who are most susceptible to poor outcomes
Interventions
Patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty and their response to postoperative rehabilitation.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients who are scheduled to undergo a total joint replacement (total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) at Bornholms regional hospital will be invited to participate.
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty
- must be able to participate in postoperative rehabilitation
- must be able to talk and understand Danish or English
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Genoptræningen
Rønne, Bornholm, 3730, Denmark
Related Publications (31)
Aasvang EK, Luna IE, Kehlet H. Challenges in postdischarge function and recovery: the case of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):861-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev257. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
PMID: 26209853BACKGROUNDArtz N, Elvers KT, Lowe CM, Sackley C, Jepson P, Beswick AD. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 7;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0469-6.
PMID: 25886975BACKGROUNDBehrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
PMID: 22000572BACKGROUNDBourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
PMID: 19844772BACKGROUNDBurns LC, Ritvo SE, Ferguson MK, Clarke H, Seltzer Z, Katz J. Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pain Res. 2015 Jan 5;8:21-32. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S64730. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25609995BACKGROUNDCollins NJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
PMID: 27012756BACKGROUNDDi Monaco M, Castiglioni C. Which type of exercise therapy is effective after hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;49(6):893-907, quiz 921-3. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PMID: 24172644BACKGROUNDDobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL. Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Dec;20(12):1548-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
PMID: 22944525BACKGROUNDDobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
PMID: 23680877BACKGROUNDDowsey MM, Gunn J, Choong PF. Selecting those to refer for joint replacement: who will likely benefit and who will not? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;28(1):157-71. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2014.01.005.
PMID: 24792950BACKGROUNDGranot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: a prospective study. Clin J Pain. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):439-45. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000135236.12705.2d.
PMID: 16093750BACKGROUNDHarding PA, Holland AE, Hinman RS, Delany C. Physical activity perceptions and beliefs following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 Feb;31(2):107-13. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.959581. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
PMID: 25495877BACKGROUNDJorgensen CC, Kehlet H; Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement Collaborative Group. Fall-related admissions after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty - cause of concern or consequence of success? Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1569-77. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52528. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
PMID: 24348026BACKGROUNDKehlet H. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1600-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61003-X. No abstract available.
PMID: 23663938BACKGROUNDKjogx H, Zachariae R, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Kasch H, Svensson P, Jensen TS, Vase L. Pain frequency moderates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 19;5:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01421. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25646089BACKGROUNDLynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482.
PMID: 21775347BACKGROUNDMancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2073-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01802.
PMID: 19723982BACKGROUNDMancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997 Jun;12(4):387-96. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90194-7.
PMID: 9195314BACKGROUNDMancuso CA, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003 Oct;18(7):872-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00276-6.
PMID: 14566742BACKGROUNDMancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83(7):1005-12. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00005.
PMID: 11451969BACKGROUNDNilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S200-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.20549. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588745BACKGROUNDNilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.
PMID: 12777182BACKGROUNDNilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/17453670902805007.
PMID: 19234886BACKGROUNDPalazzo C, Jourdan C, Descamps S, Nizard R, Hamadouche M, Anract P, Boisgard S, Galvin M, Ravaud P, Poiraudeau S. Determinants of satisfaction 1 year after total hip arthroplasty: the role of expectations fulfilment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 24;15:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-53.
PMID: 24564856BACKGROUNDPavlin DJ, Sullivan MJ, Freund PR, Roesen K. Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010.
PMID: 15599135BACKGROUNDRolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, Lyman S, Denissen G, Dawson J, Dunn J, Eresian Chenok K, Dunbar M, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Lubbeke A; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26.
PMID: 27228230BACKGROUNDRoos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88.
PMID: 9699158BACKGROUNDSmith TO, Latham S, Maskrey V, Blyth A. Patients' perceptions of physical activity before and after joint replacement: a systematic review with meta-ethnographic analysis. Postgrad Med J. 2015 Sep;91(1079):483-91. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133507. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PMID: 26306502BACKGROUNDThomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PMID: 26937689BACKGROUNDWestby MD, Brittain A, Backman CL. Expert consensus on best practices for post-acute rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a Canada and United States Delphi study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):411-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.22164.
PMID: 24023047BACKGROUNDThomsen, M. G. (2015). Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties. A Trial Evaluating Early Component Migration by RSA and Patient Reported Outcome. Study is ongoing.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Troels M. Christensen, MSc
Bornholms Regionskommune
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 3 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist, B.Pt., M.Sc.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2016
First Posted
January 4, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share