IINB vs. QLB for Elective Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric vs. Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Blockade for Elective Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Open inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. Post-operative pain can be a significant hindrance to discharge from the post anesthesia care unit. Pain can be treated with opioid therapy, but the literature supports that these agents are known to create or exacerbate adverse effects and complications, including post-operative nausea and vomiting, hypoxia, and urinary retention. In contrast, analgesia provided by regional anesthesia results in a decreased risk of the aforementioned complications.1 Because of this, various regional anesthetic techniques have been developed to provide analgesia following open herniorrhaphy. One technique is a combined ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block (IINB), which has been shown to decrease the initial pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.2 The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer regional anesthetic technique that we think could be as effective as IINB at providing pain control following open herniorrhaphy. Additionally, because local anesthetic injected during a QLB has the potential to spread cranially into the thoracic paravertebral space following its lumbar deposition it could lead to alleviation of both somatic and visceral pain.3 This might therefore improve the quality and or duration of analgesia as compared to the IINB. To the best of the author's knowledge there has been no investigation comparing the efficacy, with regards to post-operative pain management, between IINB and QLB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 17, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2019
CompletedNovember 18, 2019
October 1, 2019
1 year
December 22, 2016
October 2, 2019
November 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative Verbal Pain Score With Movement
Assessed on an 11-point (0-10) numeric analog scale with a higher score denoting a worse outcome.
8 hrs Post Nerve Block
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Post-operative Verbal Pain Score at Rest
8 hrs Post Nerve Block
Post-operative Verbal Pain Score at Rest
24 hrs Post Nerve Block
Post-operative Verbal Pain Score With Activity
24hrs Post Nerve Block
Time to First Oral Analgesic
24hrs Post Nerve Block
Time to Onset of Post Operative Pain
24hrs Post Nerve Block
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ilioinguinal / Iliohypogastric Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient's randomized to receive an Ilioinguinal / Iliohypogastric nerve block (IINB) for post operative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy will have said block performed in a supine position in a manner consistent with the technique described by Willschke, but modified to utilize an in-plane technique rather than an out-of-plane technique for needle to ultrasound probe orientation. Either a Sonosite linear HFL38x/13-6 MHz or Sonosite curvilinear C60x/5-2 MHz probe will be utilized to visualize the pertinent ultrasound anatomy. A Pajunk 21g x 100mm Sono Plex Stim Cannula will be utilized to appropriately deposit a single local anesthetic aliquot consisting of 25cc's of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5mcg/cc and clonidine 1.66mcg/cc.
Quadratus Lumborum Block
EXPERIMENTALPatient's randomized to receive a Quadratus Lumborum block (QLB) for post operative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy will have said block performed in a lateral position in a manner consistent with the technique described by Børglum. Either a Sonosite linear HFL38x/13-6 MHz or Sonosite curvilinear C60x/5-2 MHz probe will be utilized to visualize the pertinent ultrasound anatomy. A Pajunk 21g x 100mm Sono Plex Stim Cannula will be utilized to appropriately deposit a single local anesthetic aliquot consisting of 25cc's of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5mcg/cc and clonidine 1.66mcg/cc.
Interventions
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 25cc's of Bupivacaine 0.25% + Epinephrine 1:200k + Clonidine 1.66mcg/cc administered via an ultrasound guided ilioinguinal / iliohypogastric block technique.
Patients randomized to this arm will receive 25cc's of Bupivacaine 0.25% + Epinephrine 1:200k + Clonidine 1.66mcg/cc administered via an ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block technique.
Administered as part of the local anesthetic mixture
Administered as part of the local anesthetic mixture
Administered as part of the local anesthetic mixture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patient's scheduled for elective unilateral open inguinal hernia repair at WFUBMC.
You may not qualify if:
- The anesthesiologist performing the intraoperative anesthetic deems the patient inappropriate for general anesthesia.
- If the patient uses more than 40mg of Oxycodone equivalents per 24 hours or is on extended release opioid formulations.
- If there is a contraindication to the performance of a regional block
- Concomitant anticoagulation use
- Allergy to local anesthetic
- Infectious or dermatologic conditions in the area of block placement that would otherwise increase the risk of peripheral nerve blockade
- Patient refusal
- Pregnancy
- Institutionalized individuals
- Extremes of age: Age \> 90 or \< 18
- Non English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (7)
Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, Vogt WB, Coley KC, Williams JP, Roberts MS, Chelly JE, Harner CD, Fu FH. Economics of nerve block pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: potential hospital cost savings via associated postanesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):697-706. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00034.
PMID: 15108988BACKGROUNDToivonen J, Permi J, Rosenberg PH. Analgesia and discharge following preincisional ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block combined with general or spinal anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Apr;48(4):480-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00346.x.
PMID: 15025612BACKGROUNDBørglum J, Jensen K, Moriggl B, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Blockade. BJA Out Blue E-Letters 2013. Available from http://bja.oxfordjournals. org/forum/topic/brjana_el%3B9919 (accessed 16 December 2015)
BACKGROUNDFarrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 May;25(5):406-11. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00162-3.
PMID: 12727037BACKGROUNDWillschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, Johnston S, Wanzel O, Cox SG, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):226-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei157. Epub 2005 May 27.
PMID: 15923270BACKGROUNDSchuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
PMID: 3450848BACKGROUND7. Julious SA. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Christopher Edwards
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher J Edwards, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2016
First Posted
January 2, 2017
Study Start
January 30, 2017
Primary Completion
February 17, 2018
Study Completion
February 17, 2018
Last Updated
November 18, 2019
Results First Posted
November 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10