Testing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
PPE-Test
Limiting Factors for Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a Health Care Environment Evaluated in a Randomised Study: Source of Errors?
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pandemics and re-emerging diseases put pressure on the health care system to prepare for patient care and sample logistics requiring enhanced personnel protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers. We generated quantifiable data on ergonomics of PPE applicable in a health care setting by defining error rates and physically limiting factors due to PPE-induced restrictions. Nineteen study volunteers tested randomly allocated head- or full body-ventilated PPE suits equipped with powered-air-purifying-respirators and performed four different tests (two laboratory tutorials, a timed test of selective attention and a test investigating reaction time, mobility, speed and physical exercise) during 6 working hours at 22°C on one day and 4 working hours at 28°C on another day. Error rates and physical parameters (fluid loss, body temperature, heart rate) were determined and ergonomic-related parameters were assessed hourly using questionnaires. Depending on the PPE system the most restrictive factors were: reduced dexterity due to multiple glove layers, impaired visibility by flexible face shields and back pain related to the respirator of the fully ventilated suit. Heat stress and liquid loss were perceived as restrictive at a working temperature of 28°C but not 22°C.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2016
CompletedJanuary 6, 2017
January 1, 2017
1.6 years
December 5, 2016
January 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Physical measurements: Heart rate at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants
up to 2 months
Measurement of concentration (d2 Test) at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants.
This test will be analysed by descriptive analysis.
up to 2 months
Measurement of error rates at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants
For both temperatures repeated measurements and analysis of variances (rmANOVA) to assess effects of working time as a within subject factor and suit (A, B) as a between subject factor on the amount of processed tubes and the amount of wrongly screwed or arranged tubes are performed.
up to 2 months
Measurement of individual perception and wellbeing during all test series by individual questionnaires at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants.
Questionnaire data are recorded 7 times at 22°C and 5 times at 28°C and analysed with descriptive statistics.
up to 2 months
Physical measurements: Fluid loss at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants.
up to 2 months
Physical measurements: Body temperature at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants.
up to 2 months
Measurement of reaction time at 22°C and 28°C in each suit with 19 participants.
This test will be analysed by descriptive analysis.
upt o 2 months
Study Arms (2)
Performance temperature 22°C
EXPERIMENTALParticipants wearing PPE suit A or PPE suit B perform tests I -IV at 22°C.
Performance temperature 28°C
EXPERIMENTALParticipants wearing PPE suit A or PPE suit B perform tests I -IV at 28°C.
Interventions
In this randomized study following good clinical practice guidelines nineteen study volunteers were recruited to wear one of two different types of randomly allocated PPE suits. Suit A has to be used by randomly selected participants to perform four different tests six times at 22°C on one day and four times at 28°C on another day in the local core facility clinical research center.
Suit B has to be used by randomly selected participants to perform four different tests six times at 22°C on one day and four times at 28°C on another day in the local core facility clinical research center.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy, good physical and mental resiliance
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy, latex and PVC allergy, claustrophobia, hypotension, vein thrombosis, COPD, epilepsy, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, and infectious diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University Graz
Graz, 8036, Austria
Related Publications (1)
Loibner M, Hagauer S, Schwantzer G, Berghold A, Zatloukal K. Limiting factors for wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in a health care environment evaluated in a randomised study. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 22;14(1):e0210775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210775. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30668567DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kurt Zatloukal, Prof.
kurt.zatloukal@medunigraz.at
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2016
First Posted
December 29, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share