Single Versus Double Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
SD-CRYO-AF
Efficacy of Single Versus Double Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (SD-Cryo-AF): A Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a clinical study where the investigators will assess the efficacy of a single cryoballoon application per vein guided by a multipolar recording catheter as compared with a conventional technique with 2 cryoballoon applications for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Nov 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedMay 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
2.3 years
December 9, 2016
May 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of acute pulmonary vein isolation after first ablation.
Frequency of complete pulmonary vein isolation after first pass of ablation as per protocol
Acute during ablation procedure
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Procedure time
During ablation procedure
Fluoroscopy exposure
During ablation procedure
Freedom from atrial fibrillation
Evaluated after 12 months
Adverse/Serious Adverse events
Evaluated after 12 months
Quality of Life after ablation
Evaluated after 12 months
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PVI by single cryoballoon application
ACTIVE COMPARATORA single cryoballoon application for pulmonary vein isolation will be guided by a Multipolar Recording Catheter (Achieve Mapping Catheter), passed through the inner lumen of the cryoablation catheter. A single application of 4 minutes will be used per vein guided by recording of loss of electrograms and by a defined drop of temperature within 2 minutes application. If a stable position with adequate occlusion of the vein the Achieve catheter should be located proximally for evaluation of entrance block during application, but can be advanced deeper for stability and then retracted to the ostium to evaluate vein isolation (entrance block). If the vein then is isolated after a single application, the operator can move on to the next vein.
PVI by 2 cryo applications
ACTIVE COMPARATORCryoballoon ablation with a conventional guidewire passed through the inner lumen of the catheter for stability will be used. Ablation will be performed with 2 consecutive applications for 4 minutes each in each vein guided by degree of occlusion and temperature drop at the discretion of the physician.
Interventions
Pulmonary vein isolation by single cryoballoon application guided by recorded electrogram signals from an internal Mapping Catheter and by temperature drop if mapping of signals is not possible (temperature cutoff \< or = -40 degrees C)
Pulmonary vein isolation by 2 cryoballoon applications guided by degree of occlusion and by temperature drop according to discretion of physician
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF verified by ECG
- Patients with symptoms corresponding to at least Europe Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Sinus rhythm cannot be maintained for at least one hour after an electrical cardioversion.
- Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or more.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% not secondary to AF with inadequate rate control, according to the judgement of the investigator.
- Left atrial diameter ≥ 55 mm judged by transthoracic echocardiography.
- Prior AF ablation procedure.
- Longstanding persistent AF
- AF secondary to a transient or correctable abnormality including electrolyte imbalance, trauma, recent surgery, infection, toxic ingestion, and uncontrolled thyroid disease as well as AF triggered by other uniform supraventricular tachycardia.
- Contraindication to treatment with anticoagulants.
- Significant valvular disease or planned cardiac intervention.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
- Recent cardiac disease states within the last 6 months; unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures, valve disease
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device.
- Dual chamber- and single chamber-pacemaker when the patient is pacemaker dependent on ventricular level
- Patients with contraindications for transseptal catheterization or appropriate vascular access is precluded.
- Renal failure requiring dialysis or abnormalities of liver function tests.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital in Uppsala
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carina Blomström Lundqvist, Professor
Uppsala University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2016
First Posted
December 28, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share