Community Based Intervention for Children With ADHD and ASD
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new treatment, Unstuck and On Target (UOT), works better, worse, or the same as the best treatment that is available now, Contingency Behavioral Management (CBM), for low income children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 5, 2017
CompletedApril 4, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.9 years
November 21, 2016
April 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Classroom Observation total raw score at termination of intervention
15-20 minute classroom observation conducted by a treatment-blind research assistant for every study participant during the academic school day. The following behaviors are coded: Social reciprocity, Following Rules, Transitions, Gets Stuck, Negativity/Overwhelm, and Classroom Participation.
Baseline, 7-8 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence--II Block Design- T-score at termination of intervention (post testing) and 1 year later (long-term follow-up)
Baseline, 7-8 months, 19-20 months
Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System - Category Fluency and Switching Accuracy scaled scores at termination of intervention (post testing) and 1 year later (long-term follow-up)
Baseline, 7-8 months,19-20 months
Change in Executive Function Challenge Task - Flexibility and Planning raw scores at termination of intervention (post testing) and 1 year later (long-term follow-up)
Baseline, 7-8 months, 19-20 months
Change in Flexibility Interference Questions Questionnaire total raw score at termination of intervention (post testing) and 1 year later (long-term follow-up)
Baseline, 7-8 months, 19-20 months
Change in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) - Parent Form - Shift, Plan/Organize, Emotional Control and Global Executive at termination of intervention (post testing) and 1 year later (long-term follow-up)Composite T-scores
Baseline, 7-8 months, 19-20 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
UOT Students and Parents
EXPERIMENTALUnstuck and on Target (UOT) provided in the classroom for students at Title 1 schools
PATSS Students and Parents
EXPERIMENTALParents and Teachers Supporting Students (PATSS) provided in the classroom for students at Title 1 schools
Interventions
Unstuck and on Target (UOT) is a novel and innovative cognitive-behavioral treatment that directly addresses executive functioning and self-regulation deficits in ASD and ADHD. UOT is the first contextually-based EF treatment that targets flexibility, goal-setting and planning through a cognitive-behavioral program centered on self-regulatory scripts that are consistently modeled and reinforced. Parents, teachers, and interventionists will be taught to model and support flexibility across settings. Children will also participate in a peer group intervention setting.
The Contingency Behavior Management (CBM) intervention was developed by the researchers and called Parents and Teachers Supporting Students (PATSS) as a current best practice intervention that was comparable in design to Unstuck and on Target. The goal is to improve child behavioral outcomes by training parents, teachers and interventionists in core principles of behavior management like social learning and behavioral change. Children were also included in small group sessions where they identify their own behavior goals and meaningful reinforcers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The investigators will recruit children who are referred by teachers and staff at their school for concerns of flexibility (rather than those who are responding to an advertisement), so that the research will have a "real world" group of children to test the effectiveness of the treatments.
- The recruited participants will have symptoms of ASD or ADHD, will be receiving a combination of mainstream and special education supports, and will qualify to attend pull-out groups in school. All the schools involved are eligible for Title 1 governmental support, indicating that the children are from primarily low-income communities, although the investigators will not be requiring that participant's families themselves meet income cutoffs.
- Potential participants will be evaluated individually and included in the study if they achieve a Full Scale IQ score\>70, a verbal mental age\>6 years old, and meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for either a Autism Spectrum Disorder or ADHD. IQ and verbal mental age will be measured with the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd addition (WASI-2) Verbal, Performance and Full Scale IQ scores (represented as Standard Scores: mean=100; SD=15).
- To evaluate for ASD, research-valid clinical psychologists will administer the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition Module 3 (ADOS-2), a gold standard structured play/conversational interview that elicits symptoms of ASD. It produces non-standardized raw scores; higher scores indicate more symptoms. To be included in the study, each child must obtain an ADOS diagnostic algorithm \>'ASD' threshold and parents will be asked to complete the Social and Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). In order to include the full autism spectrum, these criteria are relatively inclusive.
- To confirm diagnosis of ADHD, parents will complete the ADHD portion of the MINI-Kid ADHD interview with a trained interviewer, and their child must meet DSM-IV criteria for any Attention Disorder. The researchers will include children who had observable symptoms in two of three settings. As all children will be referred for the study because teachers or staff at their school observed symptoms, the children will have to also meet criteria on the MINI-Kid interview or the trained clinician completing their testing will have to observe notable symptoms, or both, for the child to be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be excluded from the study if they have a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or major depression that is currently preventing them from participating in classroom activities.
- Students with anxiety, mild depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder or other problems that do not prevent them from participating in the majority of classroom activities will not be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lauren Kenworthylead
- Georgetown Universitycollaborator
- University of Colorado, Denvercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's Research Institude, Children's National Heath System
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Related Publications (8)
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision. 2000.
BACKGROUNDClopper CJ, Pearson, ES. The use of the confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26(4): 404-413, 1934.
BACKGROUNDDelis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. 2001.
BACKGROUNDGioia GA, Isquith PK, Kenworthy L, Barton RM. Profiles of everyday executive function in acquired and developmental disorders. Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun;8(2):121-37. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.2.121.8727.
PMID: 12638065BACKGROUNDGioia GA, Isquith PK, Retzlaff PD, Espy KA. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a clinical sample. Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Dec;8(4):249-57. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.4.249.13513.
PMID: 12759822BACKGROUNDMather N, Wendling BJ. Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement: Examiner manual standard and extended batteries. Rolling Meadows, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2014.
BACKGROUNDWeisz JR, Ugueto AM, Cheron DM, Herren J. Evidence-based youth psychotherapy in the mental health ecosystem. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(2):274-86. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.764824. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
PMID: 23402704BACKGROUNDWells KC, Pelham WE, Kotkin RA, Hoza B, Abikoff HB, Abramowitz A, Arnold LE, Cantwell DP, Conners CK, Del Carmen R, Elliott G, Greenhill LL, Hechtman L, Hibbs E, Hinshaw SP, Jensen PS, March JS, Swanson JM, Schiller E. Psychosocial treatment strategies in the MTA study: rationale, methods, and critical issues in design and implementation. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000 Dec;28(6):483-505. doi: 10.1023/a:1005174913412.
PMID: 11104313BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lauren Kenworthy, Ph.D.
Children's National Health Services
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Anthony, Ph.D.
University of Colorado, Denver
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ASSOC CHIEF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2016
First Posted
December 28, 2016
Study Start
September 13, 2014
Primary Completion
August 5, 2017
Study Completion
August 5, 2017
Last Updated
April 4, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share