Ibuprofen/Caffeine Lower Back or Neck Pain Study
A Randomized, Placebo- and Active-controlled Multi-country, Multi-centre Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of 400 mg Ibuprofen and 100 mg Caffeine Compared to Ibuprofen 400 mg and Placebo in Patients With Acute Lower Back or Neck Pain.
2 other identifiers
interventional
635
2 countries
18
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy and safety of a 400 mg ibuprofen/100 mg caffeine tablet in comparison to a 400 mg ibuprofen tablet for the treatment of acute lower back or neck pain. To assess the safety and tolerability of a 400 mg ibuprofen/100 mg caffeine tablet in comparison to a 400 mg ibuprofen tablet and a placebo tablet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Dec 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 7, 2019
CompletedJune 7, 2019
March 1, 2019
9 months
November 17, 2016
September 27, 2018
March 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)
The change in pain on movement (POM) with regard to the worst procedure (WP), i.e. the procedure with the highest pain score at baseline (POMwp), between baseline (morning of Day 1, pre-dosing) and Day 2 (morning, 2 hour (h) after drug intake). POM was assessed by the patient at the performance of one standardized, muscle group specific movement and was measured by a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 = 'no pain'to 10 = 'worst pain possible for this condition'. The procedure resulting in highest POM at baseline (worst procedure, POMWP) was repeated for an individual patient. If 2 or more procedures gave the same highest POM, the patient was asked which of the procedures giving the highest POM scores he/she considered the most unpleasant. Change in POMwp was calculated as baseline POMwp - POMwp at Day 2 - indicating a reduction in POMwp, where the result is positive.
Baseline and Day 2
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 4 (morning)
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))
Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6 (morning)
Change in Pressure Algometry Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hour After Drug Intake)
Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)
Global Assessment of Efficacy by the Patient at the End of Treatment (Morning of Day 6)
At the end of treatment (morning of Day 6)
Number of Patients With a Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% or 50% Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 h After Drug Intake)
Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
ibuprofen + caffeine
EXPERIMENTALFixed Dose Combination
ibuprofen
ACTIVE COMPARATORplacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated written informed consent at Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation.
- Male or female patients who are \>=18 years with current diagnosis of acute back pain or of neck pain for at least 24 hours, but less than 21 days.
- Acute back pain or acute neck pain resulting in Pain on Movement (POM) \>=5 on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for at least one POM procedure out of 5 standardised procedures.
- Sensitivity to algometric pressure on the painful trigger point \<= 25 N/cm².
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control.
- Reliable, cooperative, and of adequate intelligence to record the requested information on the analgesic questionnaires.
- Examined by the attending physician and medically cleared to participate in the study
- In good general health, with a body mass index (BMI) \< 30, and have no contraindications to any of the study medication
You may not qualify if:
- History of 3 or more episodes of back or neck pain in the last 6 months excluding the current episode.
- Patients with pain at rest \>= 9
- Patient with chronic back or neck pain as defined as pain for 3 weeks or longer.
- Back or neck pain that is attributable to any identifiable cause (eg. disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, osteomalacia, inflammatory arthritis, metabolic, neurological diseases or tumour)
- Any strains of the back or neck muscles documented by clinical evaluation and anamnesis that occurred 21 days to 3 months prior to the screening visit.
- Surgery due to back or neck pain or rehabilitation due to back or neck pain in the last 12 months.
- Prior use within the last 3 days before Visit 1 or concomitant use of any anti- inflammatory drugs, heparinoids, muscle relaxants or analgesics (including but not limited to short-acting glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\], herbal preparations) for the same indication or other indications.
- Spinal injections should have been discontinued in due time (investigator's judgment) before patient enrollment to allow complete wash-out of the active ingredient based on investigator's judgment.
- Known severe hepatocellular insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency or Gilbert's syndrome (Morbus Meulengracht)
- Patients taking Central Nervous System (CNS) or other psychotropic drugs, or any nutritional supplement known to have psychotropic effects such as St. John's Wort, Chapparal, Comfrey, Germander, Gin Bu Huan, Kava, Pennyroyal Skullcap, or Valerian within two months of taking the first dose of study medication. Patients who have been on stable doses of these medications for at least two months will be allowed into the study, as long as they maintain this dose throughout the study, and their condition is judged stable by the Principal Investigator
- Any other medical condition that would interfere with efficacy and safety assessments based on investigator's judgment or any on-going clinical condition that would jeopardize patient's or site personnel's safety or study compliance based on investigator judgment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
Dünnwaldpraxis, Köln
Cologne, 51069, Germany
Praxis Dr. Steinebach, Essen
Essen, 45277, Germany
Praxis Dr. Schaefer, 45355 Essen
Essen, 45355, Germany
Studienzentrum Bocholderstraße
Essen, 45355, Germany
Unterfrintroper Hausarztzentrum
Essen, 45359, Germany
Praxis Dr. Pabst, Gilching
Gilching, 82205, Germany
Praxis Kai Gastl
Gilching, 82205, Germany
medicoKIT GmbH
Goch, 47574, Germany
Clinical Research Dr. Martz
Hamburg, 22143, Germany
Praxis Dr. Dahmen, 22415 Hamburg
Hamburg, 22415, Germany
Praxis Dr. Chevts, 76199 Karlsruhe
Karlsruhe, 76199, Germany
Praxis Dr. Klein, Künzing
Künzing, 94550, Germany
Anästhesiologie Rheinbach
Rheinbach, 53359, Germany
Praxis Dr. Sauter
Wangen, 88239, Germany
Neurologie und Psychiatrie / Psychotherapie
Westerstede, 26655, Germany
State Healthcare Institution, City Out-Patient's Clinic #109
Saint Petersburg, 192283, Russia
Medical Centre "Reavita Med SPb" LLC
Saint Petersburg, 194325, Russia
City Outpatient dep.no.107;clinc.pharmacology,st.petersburg
Saint Petersburg, 195030, Russia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Centre
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2016
First Posted
December 26, 2016
Study Start
December 20, 2016
Primary Completion
September 24, 2017
Study Completion
September 28, 2017
Last Updated
June 7, 2019
Results First Posted
June 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03