Study Stopped
Organisational changes at site meant that recruitment was no longer feasible.
Effectiveness of Tracking Goals in Counselling
Goals in MIND
Goals in Mind: A Randomised Controlled Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tracking Goals in Counselling
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recent evidence suggests that focusing on positive goals rather than problems to avoid, may be associated with better psychological health and attainment of goals. In addition, the advantages of using personalised measures have been highlighted in a number of studies. The Goals Form is a new measure that comprises both elements. It invites clients, in collaboration with their therapist, to identify up to seven goals for therapy typically at a first assessment session and then to rate them on a 1-7 Likert scale, with 1 being not at all achieved and 7 being completely achieved. This research is important for clinical practice as it provides the foundations to identify what might be a helpful factor in counselling and psychotherapy. The aim of the study is to test whether the use of the Goals Form leads to better clinical outcomes in counselling and psychotherapy. Participants in this study are counsellors and service users at Tower Hamlets Mind. The design of this study is a trial, which looks at comparing outcome measure scores in 'therapy as usual' and 'therapy using the Goals Form' when participants are randomly assigned to one of the two conditions. Interventions in this study involve using the Goals Form at the start of every session and taking part in a 30 minute interview once therapy has ended to give feedback about using the form in therapy . In addition to assessing outcome, the study also serves to compare satisfaction scores across the two conditions. It is a pilot to determine the feasibility of such trial including recruitment rates over a period of a year, adherence of counsellors and clients to the protocol, and the ethical issues raised.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 13, 2022
December 1, 2021
9 months
December 17, 2016
December 23, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CORE-10
5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Service satisfaction survey
5 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Completing the Goals Form
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, client participants will complete the Goals Form in collaboration with their therapists at the start of every session.
therapy as usual
NO INTERVENTIONIn this arm, clients will have therapy as usual.
Interventions
The Goals Form is a personalised outcome measure where clients enter their goals in collaboration with their assessor. Goals are then rated at the start of every session and open the therapeutic dialogue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All clients referred for counselling in the service.
You may not qualify if:
- Service users who do not understand verbal and written communication in English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Roehamptonlead
- MIND Tower Hamletscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tower Hamlets Mind
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Anker MG, Duncan BL, Sparks JA. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: a randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):693-704. doi: 10.1037/a0016062.
PMID: 19634962BACKGROUNDConnell J, Barkham M, Stiles WB, Twigg E, Singleton N, Evans O, Miles JN. Distribution of CORE-OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS-R. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;190:69-74. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017657.
PMID: 17197659BACKGROUNDDuncan BL, Reese RJ. The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) revisiting the client's frame of reference. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2015 Dec;52(4):391-401. doi: 10.1037/pst0000026.
PMID: 26641369BACKGROUNDFarr, J., Di Malta, G. S., & Cooper, M. (2020). Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Counselling in a Community Mental Health Setting: Pitfalls and Learnings. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12262
RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mick Cooper, D. Phil.
Professor of Counselling Psychology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Counselling Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2016
First Posted
December 21, 2016
Study Start
October 19, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share