Spinal Versus General Anesthesia With Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery.
LMA vs Spinal
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in patient outcomes with general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia when given in addition to popliteal and adductor canal nerve blocks for foot and ankle surgery. Popliteal and adductor canal nerve blocks are injections of local anesthetic agents near nerves in the back and front of the knee going to the foot and ankle that provide numbness during and after surgery. These peripheral nerve blocks offer good pain control and reduce the need for opioids (opioids are pain medications such as morphine, Dilaudid, and oxycodone). General anesthesia involves the flow of oxygen and anesthesia gas through a tube which, along with additional intravenous medications, causes unconsciousness and unawareness of sensations during surgery. Spinal anesthesia involves an injection of local anesthetic in the lower back, which causes numbness below the waist. In addition to spinal anesthesia, a sedative is typically given intravenously to cause relaxation and sleepiness throughout surgery. General, spinal, and nerve block anesthesia are all routinely used for surgery at the Hospital for Special Surgery. General or spinal anesthesia is typically used in addition to peripheral nerve blocks during foot and ankle surgery to 1) allow the surgeons to use a thigh tourniquet to reduce bleeding, 2) provide anesthesia earlier, and 3) prevent unwanted movement. However, it is unclear whether general or spinal anesthesia provides better patient outcomes when given with peripheral nerve blocks. Some reports show that on its own, spinal anesthesia has advantages over general anesthesia in terms of side effects such as nausea and pain. However, these advantages may also be gained from combining peripheral nerve blocks with general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia can be associated with headache and backache, although headache and backache can also happen after operations performed with general anesthesia. A previous study at the Hospital for Special Surgery showed low rates of nausea among patients who received nerve blocks with spinal anesthesia, and no nausea among patients who received a nerve block with general anesthesia. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to determine if, as a treatment, either general or spinal anesthesia has advantages over the other treatment in terms of readiness for discharge, side effects, pain and patient satisfaction in an ambulatory foot and ankle population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 12, 2019
CompletedNovember 12, 2019
November 1, 2019
4 months
December 2, 2016
June 15, 2018
November 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time Until Patient is Ready for Discharge From Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) to Home.
Modified Aldrete Scoring System and Marshall and Chung Postanesthesia Discharge Scoring System, measured in time until discharge criteria is met (in minutes)
Duration of stay in recovery room after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at 1 Hour Postop
1 hour after PACU admission
Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores at 2 Hours Postop
2 hours after PACU admission
Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores on Postoperative Day (POD) 1
24 hours after surgery
Postoperative Discomfort and Needs (Post-op Pain, Sore Throat, Back Pain, Nausea, Cold, Hunger, Thirst)
1 hour after surgery
Postoperative Discomfort and Needs (Post-op Pain, Sore Throat, Back Pain, Nausea, Cold, Hunger, Thirst)
2 hours after surgery
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Spinal anesthesia with popliteal and adductor canal blocks.
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound (US) guided sciatic nerve blocks in the popliteal fossa and adductor canal block with 25 mL and 10 mL, respectively, of 0.25% bupivacaine (plus 2 mg preservative-free (PF) dexamethasone / 30 ml), performed under procedural IV sedation protocol. IV sedation protocol: midazolam, 2-5 mg IV + Glycopyrrolate, 0.1 mg IV + Ketamine, 10-20 mg, + propofol as needed. Spinal protocol: 45-60 mg 1.5% mepivacaine, depending on the expected case duration (45 mg for cases with projected duration 1-2 hours, 60 mg for cases with projected duration 2-3 hours). Intraoperative sedation maintained with propofol infusion and ketamine, 10 mg/hr.
General anesthesia with popliteal and adductor canal blocks.
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound (US) guided sciatic nerve blocks in the popliteal fossa and adductor canal block with 25 mL and 10 mL, respectively, of 0.25% bupivacaine (plus 2 mg preservative-free (PF) dexamethasone / 30 ml), performed under procedural IV sedation protocol. IV sedation protocol: midazolam, 2-5 mg IV + Glycopyrrolate, 0.1 mg IV + Ketamine, 10-20 mg, + propofol as needed. General anesthesia protocol: After induction with propofol and insertion of the LMA, anesthesia maintained with titrated propofol infusion, sevoflurane, ketamine 10 mg/hr.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged patients
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification 1-3
- Elective foot and ankle day surgery procedures, lasting between 1 and 3 hours as per surgeon, performed by 3 co-investigator surgeons.
- Planned for combined popliteal and adductor canal block
- No contraindications for spinal or LMA general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Incapable of providing informed consent
- Contraindications for regional or LMA anesthesia (anticoagulation, infection at injection site)
- Anticipated difficult airway
- BMI\>40
- Anticipated surgical procedure time less than 1 hour or more than 3 hours
- Hx of severe postoperative nausea and vomiting
- ASA \>3
- Peripheral neuropathy affecting the operative extremity
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Chronic opioid use (daily use of opioids one month prior to surgery/ patients requiring chronic pain interventions)
- Prone position
- Obstructive sleep apnea with planned admission overnight to the hospital
- Known allergy/sensitivity to any study medications
- Planned admission after surgery
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Related Publications (1)
YaDeau JT, Fields KG, Kahn RL, LaSala VR, Ellis SJ, Levine DS, Paroli L, Luu TH, Roberts MM. Readiness for Discharge After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal and General Anesthesia as Supplements to Nerve Blocks. Anesth Analg. 2018 Sep;127(3):759-766. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003456.
PMID: 29847387DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- George Birch
- Organization
- Hospital for Special Surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques YaDeau, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2016
First Posted
December 19, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 12, 2019
Results First Posted
November 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11