Energy Consumption and Cardiorespiratory Load During Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Non-Ambulatory Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study will be to investigate the energy consumption, cardiorespiratory load and perceived exertion in non-ambulatory subacute stroke patients during a robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) session and to compare the exercise intensity with aerobic training recommendations. The second aim is to investigate the effect of different levels of guidance force on the energy consumption, cardiorespiratory load and perceived exertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2019
CompletedFebruary 8, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.8 years
December 13, 2016
February 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Oxygen consumption (VO2)
Average oxygen consumption (mL/kg/min) at different time frames. Oxygen consumption will be measured continuously (from the beginning of rest till the end of walking). Offline calculations (e.g. averages) will be performed afterwards.
End 5min resting period; Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1, 2 and 3)
Carbon Dioxide Production (CO2)
Average carbon dioxide production (mL/kg/min) at different time frames. Carbon dioxide production will be measured continuously (from the beginning of rest till the end of walking). Offline calculations (e.g. averages) will be performed afterwards.
End 5min resting period; Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1, 2 and 3)
Minute ventilation (VE)
Average amount of air in- or exhaled (L/min) at different time frames. VE will be measured continuously (from the beginning of rest till the end of the walking session). Offline calculations will be performed afterwards.
End 5min resting period; Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1, 2 and 3)
Heart rate (HR)
Average heart rate (beats/min) at different time frames. Heart rate will be measured continuously (from the beginning of rest till the end of the walking session). Offline calculations will be performed afterwards.
End 5min resting period; Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1, 2 and 3)
Percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR)
The percentage of the heart rate reserve (i.e. the difference between the person's predicted maximum heart rate and the person's resting heart rate) at different time moments (= heart rate at different times moments divided by predicted heart rate reserve).
Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1)
Percentage maximal heart rate (%HRmax)
The percentage of the person's predicted maximal heart rate at different time moments (= heart rate at different times moments divided by predicted maximal heart rate).
Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1)
Rating of perceived exertion (assessed by the 6-20 Borg scale) (RPE)
Rating of perceived effort, strain and/or fatigue during walking, pointed on a 15-point Borg scale (6-20) at the end of rest and during walking (every 3 minutes).
End 5min resting period; Begin, mid and end of 20min walking period (session 1, 2 and 3)
Study Arms (1)
Lokomat training
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be tested in 3 Lokomat training sessions on 3 separate days. During the first session patients will walk in the Lokomat according to their regular therapy settings. During the second and third session patients will walk in the Lokomat with 2 different levels of guidance force (100% guidance force and 60% guidance force).
Interventions
Patients will walk in the Lokomat according to their regular therapy settings for a minimum of 20 minutes (i.e. minimum tolerable guidance force (GF), minimal tolerable body weight support (BWS) and maximum tolerable walking speed)
Patients will walk in the Lokomat with 100% GF for a minimum of 20 minutes (same amount of body weight support and walking speed as in the first session)
Patients will walk in the Lokomat with 60% GF for a minimum of 20 minutes (same amount of body weight support and walking speed as in the first session)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-ever subacute (≤ 3 months) stroke patients
- Eligible to receive robot-assisted gait training according to local therapists' criteria (i.e. non-ambulatory stroke patients that are able to bear full weight on the hemiplegic leg during a minimum of one gait cycle with manual help allowed to maintain balance)
- Functional Ambulation Category \< 3
- Trained in the Lokomat system 2 times prior to the start of the study (i.e. one fitting session and one training session).
You may not qualify if:
- \> 135 kg and \>179 cm
- Unstable cardiovascular conditions
- Musculoskeletal problems (other than stroke) affecting the ability to walk
- Concurrent pulmonary diseases (e.g. asthma)
- Concurrent neurological diseases
- Communicative and/or cognitive problems affecting the ability to comprehend or follow instructions
- Other problems affecting the execution of the intervention (e.g. severe spasticity, contractures or dermatological contra-indications)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Ursula Rehabilitation Centre (Jessa Hospital)
Herk-de-Stad, Limburg, 3540, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Eric Kerckhofs, Prof. Ph.D
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eva Swinnen, Prof. Ph.D
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nina Lefeber, Ph.D student
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2016
First Posted
December 16, 2016
Study Start
March 16, 2017
Primary Completion
January 8, 2019
Study Completion
January 8, 2019
Last Updated
February 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02