NCT02994589

Brief Summary

The investigators objective is to compare OASIS wound matrix with other commonly used dressings available for the donor site in split thickness skin grafting in order to determine which dressing provides the best outcome based on pain level, time to healing and aesthetic outcome.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 31, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to Heal

    Patient will be followed up during routine post-operative appointments at the clinic weekly to check the healing process of the donor site wound.

    7-21 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Aesthetic Outcome

    1-12 weeks

  • Pain intensity measure

    7 days

Study Arms (3)

OASIS® wound matrix

EXPERIMENTAL

OASIS wound matrix is a biologic extracellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa. Some components of OASIS wound matrix are similar to human dermis including types of collagens, elastin, glycoproteins and proteoglycans. In addition, OASIS wound matrix retains some growth factors that have been suggested to aid in the wound healing process. It is a FDA approved wound dressing indicated for use in a variety of ulcers, abrasions and surgical wounds.

Device: OASIS® wound matrix

Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Transparent dressing allows for wound monitoring without changing the dressing Clear design takes the guesswork out of application over the wound Novel acrylic polymer pad technology designed to handle low to moderate wound drainage. No dressing breakdown in the wound. Low friction surface minimizes potential for friction and shear. Allows for gentle removal from skin. Barrier to external contaminants, body fluids, bacteria and viruses.

Other: Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

Xeroform™

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Xeroform™ Occlusive Petrolatum Gauze. 3% Bismuth Tribromophenate in a special petrolatum blend on fine mesh gauze. Non-adherent. Clings and conforms to all body contours.

Other: Xeroform™

Interventions

3M™ Tegaderm™ Dressing helps provide the natural moisture balance conducive to wound healing.

Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

OASIS® Matrix is indicated for the management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs' surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence).

OASIS® wound matrix

Xeroform™ consists of a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with bismuth tribromophenate.

Xeroform™

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients scheduled to undergo split thickness skin grafting
  • patients able to consent without a proxy

You may not qualify if:

  • confounding medical conditions
  • previous skin grafting from site
  • prior use of biological skin substitute on site

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.042.

  • Hankin CS, Knispel J, Lopes M, Bronstone A, Maus E. Clinical and cost efficacy of advanced wound care matrices for venous ulcers. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5):375-84. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.375.

  • Eskes AM, Brolmann FE, Gerbens LA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H; REMBRANDT study group. Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Oct 17;12:229. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-229.

  • Fernandes de Carvalho V, Paggiaro AO, Isaac C, Gringlas J, Ferreira MC. Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182349d2f.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

2,4,6-tribromophenol

Study Officials

  • Subhas Gupta, MD, PhD

    Loma Linda University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hahns Kim, MD

    Loma Linda University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2015

First Posted

December 16, 2016

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 16, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share