Study Stopped
Study was never started
A Comparison of OASIS Wound Matrix With Approved Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites
OASIS
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators objective is to compare OASIS wound matrix with other commonly used dressings available for the donor site in split thickness skin grafting in order to determine which dressing provides the best outcome based on pain level, time to healing and aesthetic outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2016
CompletedDecember 16, 2016
December 1, 2016
2 months
August 31, 2015
December 13, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Heal
Patient will be followed up during routine post-operative appointments at the clinic weekly to check the healing process of the donor site wound.
7-21 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Aesthetic Outcome
1-12 weeks
Pain intensity measure
7 days
Study Arms (3)
OASIS® wound matrix
EXPERIMENTALOASIS wound matrix is a biologic extracellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa. Some components of OASIS wound matrix are similar to human dermis including types of collagens, elastin, glycoproteins and proteoglycans. In addition, OASIS wound matrix retains some growth factors that have been suggested to aid in the wound healing process. It is a FDA approved wound dressing indicated for use in a variety of ulcers, abrasions and surgical wounds.
Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransparent dressing allows for wound monitoring without changing the dressing Clear design takes the guesswork out of application over the wound Novel acrylic polymer pad technology designed to handle low to moderate wound drainage. No dressing breakdown in the wound. Low friction surface minimizes potential for friction and shear. Allows for gentle removal from skin. Barrier to external contaminants, body fluids, bacteria and viruses.
Xeroform™
ACTIVE COMPARATORXeroform™ Occlusive Petrolatum Gauze. 3% Bismuth Tribromophenate in a special petrolatum blend on fine mesh gauze. Non-adherent. Clings and conforms to all body contours.
Interventions
3M™ Tegaderm™ Dressing helps provide the natural moisture balance conducive to wound healing.
OASIS® Matrix is indicated for the management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs' surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence).
Xeroform™ consists of a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with bismuth tribromophenate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients scheduled to undergo split thickness skin grafting
- patients able to consent without a proxy
You may not qualify if:
- confounding medical conditions
- previous skin grafting from site
- prior use of biological skin substitute on site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.042.
PMID: 15886669RESULTHankin CS, Knispel J, Lopes M, Bronstone A, Maus E. Clinical and cost efficacy of advanced wound care matrices for venous ulcers. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5):375-84. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.375.
PMID: 22663170RESULTEskes AM, Brolmann FE, Gerbens LA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H; REMBRANDT study group. Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Oct 17;12:229. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-229.
PMID: 21999705RESULTFernandes de Carvalho V, Paggiaro AO, Isaac C, Gringlas J, Ferreira MC. Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182349d2f.
PMID: 22011820RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Subhas Gupta, MD, PhD
Loma Linda University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hahns Kim, MD
Loma Linda University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2015
First Posted
December 16, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share