Forced Air and Intravenous Fluid Warmers in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
Comparison Between Forced Air and Intravenous Fluid Warmers in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perioperative hypothermia is a common problem. It has been defined as a core temperature below 36ºC. The reasons why patient undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery has perioperative hypothermia because the reduced metabolic heat production, redistribution of heat from the core to the periphery and impaired thermoregulation (due to anesthetics), use of cool carbon dioxide gas insufflations and surgical irrigation solution, as well as heat loss due to the cool environment. This perioperative problem has been linked to adverse patient outcomes such as myocardial ischemia as hypothermia increases plasma catecholamine, surgical site infection as hypothermia diminishes wound tissue O2 tension and coagulopathy as hypothermia impairs platelet function. It claims that perioperative heat loss occurs by radiation (60%), convection (25%) and evaporation (10%). This is caused by the difference between peripheral body and ambient temperature, air circulation around the body and vasodilatation. In daily practice, most anesthesia personnel warm patient peri-operatively by using force air warmer and intravenous fluid warmer. This study aimed to compare the difference of core and room temperature in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery by using forced air and intravenous fluid warmer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedApril 4, 2019
August 1, 2018
2.7 years
December 3, 2016
April 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The difference of core and room temperature in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (by using forced air and intravenous fluid warmer)
To study the difference between two groups
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
Forced Air warmer (bair hugger)
EXPERIMENTAL. In groups: A = 45, receiving intraoperative forced air warming( bair hugger). The forced air was delivered at the high setting of 43ºC
Intravenous Fluid Warmer(ranger warmer)
EXPERIMENTALIn groups:B =45, having intraoperative intravenous fluid via a fluid warmer patients received intravenous fluid via a fluid warmer after induction anesthesia. The device automatically heated fluid up to 41ºC as set point.
Interventions
* record room temperature * record core temperature (tympanic membrane) * General anesthesia * using forced air warmer (bair hugger) * Intravenous fluid at room temperature * room temperature and core temperature q15 minutes * anesthesia finish, stop bair hugger * record core temperature before recovery room
* record room temperature * record core temperature (tympanic membrane) * General anesthesia * using ranger warmer * Intravenous fluid at room temperature * room temperature and core temperature q15 minutes * anesthesia finish, stop ranger warmer * record core temperature before recovery room
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA class 1-3, 18-65 years old, BMI 25-30 kg/sq.m., core temperature 36ºC-38ºC, operation more than 90 minutes
You may not qualify if:
- turn operation to exploratory laparotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Siriraj Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Warunee Boayam
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Related Publications (16)
Allen PB, Salyer SW, Dubick MA, Holcomb JB, Blackbourne LH. Preventing hypothermia: comparison of current devices used by the US Army in an in vitro warmed fluid model. J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S154-61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e45ba5.
PMID: 20622611BACKGROUNDBrandt S, Oguz R, Huttner H, Waglechner G, Chiari A, Greif R, Kurz A, Kimberger O. Resistive-polymer versus forced-air warming: comparable efficacy in orthopedic patients. Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):834-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3f5f. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
PMID: 20042442BACKGROUNDWagner K, Swanson E, Raymond CJ, Smith CE. Comparison of two convective warming systems during major abdominal and orthopedic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;55(6):358-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03021491.
PMID: 18566199BACKGROUNDRein EB, Filtvedt M, Walloe L, Raeder JC. Hypothermia during laparotomy can be prevented by locally applied warm water and pulsating negative pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):331-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael369. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
PMID: 17259258BACKGROUNDFeroe DD, Augustine SD. Hypothermia in the PACU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1991 Mar;3(1):135-44.
PMID: 2043323BACKGROUNDWitkowski W, Maj J. [Pathophysiology and management of perioperative hypothermia]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Jun;20(120):629-34. Polish.
PMID: 17007255BACKGROUNDTurner M, Hodzovic I, Mapleson WW. Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices*. Anaesthesia. 2006 Jun;61(6):571-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04589.x.
PMID: 16704592BACKGROUNDBernthal EM. Inadvertent hypothermia prevention: the anaesthetic nurses' role. Br J Nurs. 1999 Jan 14-27;8(1):17-25. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.1.17.
PMID: 10085808BACKGROUNDBennett J, Ramachandra V, Webster J, Carli F. Prevention of hypothermia during hip surgery: effect of passive compared with active skin surface warming. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Aug;73(2):180-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.2.180.
PMID: 7917732BACKGROUNDBorms SF, Engelen SL, Himpe DG, Suy MR, Theunissen WJ. Bair hugger forced-air warming maintains normothermia more effectively than thermo-lite insulation. J Clin Anesth. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(4):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)90077-9.
PMID: 7946366BACKGROUNDGiesbrecht GG, Ducharme MB, McGuire JP. Comparison of forced-air patient warming systems for perioperative use. Anesthesiology. 1994 Mar;80(3):671-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00026.
PMID: 8141463BACKGROUNDBieberich MT, Van Duren AP. Thermal control and design considerations for a high-performance fluid warmer. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2003 Mar-Apr;37(2):103-12. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2003)37[103:TCADCF]2.0.CO;2.
PMID: 12677748BACKGROUNDPatel N, Smith CE, Pinchak AC, Hagen JF. Prospective, randomized comparison of the Flotem Iie and Hotline fluid warmers in anesthetized adults. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Jun;8(4):307-16. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00040-2.
PMID: 8695135BACKGROUNDPresson RG Jr, Bezruczko AP, Hillier SC, McNiece WL. Evaluation of a new fluid warmer effective at low to moderate flow rates. Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):974-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199305000-00023.
PMID: 8489069BACKGROUNDFaries G, Johnston C, Pruitt KM, Plouff RT. Temperature relationship to distance and flow rate of warmed i.v. fluids. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Nov;20(11):1198-200. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81470-2.
PMID: 1952305BACKGROUNDAdriani MB, Moriber N. Preoperative forced-air warming combined with intraoperative warming versus intraoperative warming alone in the prevention of hypothermia during gynecologic surgery. AANA J. 2013 Dec;81(6):446-51.
PMID: 24597006BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Warunee Boayam, NS
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2016
First Posted
December 13, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share