NCT02990429

Brief Summary

Perioperative hypothermia is a common problem. It has been defined as a core temperature below 36ºC. The reasons why patient undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery has perioperative hypothermia because the reduced metabolic heat production, redistribution of heat from the core to the periphery and impaired thermoregulation (due to anesthetics), use of cool carbon dioxide gas insufflations and surgical irrigation solution, as well as heat loss due to the cool environment. This perioperative problem has been linked to adverse patient outcomes such as myocardial ischemia as hypothermia increases plasma catecholamine, surgical site infection as hypothermia diminishes wound tissue O2 tension and coagulopathy as hypothermia impairs platelet function. It claims that perioperative heat loss occurs by radiation (60%), convection (25%) and evaporation (10%). This is caused by the difference between peripheral body and ambient temperature, air circulation around the body and vasodilatation. In daily practice, most anesthesia personnel warm patient peri-operatively by using force air warmer and intravenous fluid warmer. This study aimed to compare the difference of core and room temperature in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery by using forced air and intravenous fluid warmer

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 13, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

hypothermiaShiveringGynecologic laparoscopic surgeryWarmingGeneral anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The difference of core and room temperature in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (by using forced air and intravenous fluid warmer)

    To study the difference between two groups

    1 Year

Study Arms (2)

Forced Air warmer (bair hugger)

EXPERIMENTAL

. In groups: A = 45, receiving intraoperative forced air warming( bair hugger). The forced air was delivered at the high setting of 43ºC

Procedure: Forced Air warmer

Intravenous Fluid Warmer(ranger warmer)

EXPERIMENTAL

In groups:B =45, having intraoperative intravenous fluid via a fluid warmer patients received intravenous fluid via a fluid warmer after induction anesthesia. The device automatically heated fluid up to 41ºC as set point.

Procedure: Intravenous Fluid Warmer

Interventions

* record room temperature * record core temperature (tympanic membrane) * General anesthesia * using forced air warmer (bair hugger) * Intravenous fluid at room temperature * room temperature and core temperature q15 minutes * anesthesia finish, stop bair hugger * record core temperature before recovery room

Forced Air warmer (bair hugger)

* record room temperature * record core temperature (tympanic membrane) * General anesthesia * using ranger warmer * Intravenous fluid at room temperature * room temperature and core temperature q15 minutes * anesthesia finish, stop ranger warmer * record core temperature before recovery room

Intravenous Fluid Warmer(ranger warmer)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA class 1-3, 18-65 years old, BMI 25-30 kg/sq.m., core temperature 36ºC-38ºC, operation more than 90 minutes

You may not qualify if:

  • turn operation to exploratory laparotomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Warunee Boayam

Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Allen PB, Salyer SW, Dubick MA, Holcomb JB, Blackbourne LH. Preventing hypothermia: comparison of current devices used by the US Army in an in vitro warmed fluid model. J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S154-61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e45ba5.

    PMID: 20622611BACKGROUND
  • Brandt S, Oguz R, Huttner H, Waglechner G, Chiari A, Greif R, Kurz A, Kimberger O. Resistive-polymer versus forced-air warming: comparable efficacy in orthopedic patients. Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):834-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3f5f. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

    PMID: 20042442BACKGROUND
  • Wagner K, Swanson E, Raymond CJ, Smith CE. Comparison of two convective warming systems during major abdominal and orthopedic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;55(6):358-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03021491.

    PMID: 18566199BACKGROUND
  • Rein EB, Filtvedt M, Walloe L, Raeder JC. Hypothermia during laparotomy can be prevented by locally applied warm water and pulsating negative pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):331-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael369. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

    PMID: 17259258BACKGROUND
  • Feroe DD, Augustine SD. Hypothermia in the PACU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1991 Mar;3(1):135-44.

    PMID: 2043323BACKGROUND
  • Witkowski W, Maj J. [Pathophysiology and management of perioperative hypothermia]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006 Jun;20(120):629-34. Polish.

    PMID: 17007255BACKGROUND
  • Turner M, Hodzovic I, Mapleson WW. Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices*. Anaesthesia. 2006 Jun;61(6):571-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04589.x.

    PMID: 16704592BACKGROUND
  • Bernthal EM. Inadvertent hypothermia prevention: the anaesthetic nurses' role. Br J Nurs. 1999 Jan 14-27;8(1):17-25. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.1.17.

    PMID: 10085808BACKGROUND
  • Bennett J, Ramachandra V, Webster J, Carli F. Prevention of hypothermia during hip surgery: effect of passive compared with active skin surface warming. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Aug;73(2):180-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.2.180.

    PMID: 7917732BACKGROUND
  • Borms SF, Engelen SL, Himpe DG, Suy MR, Theunissen WJ. Bair hugger forced-air warming maintains normothermia more effectively than thermo-lite insulation. J Clin Anesth. 1994 Jul-Aug;6(4):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)90077-9.

    PMID: 7946366BACKGROUND
  • Giesbrecht GG, Ducharme MB, McGuire JP. Comparison of forced-air patient warming systems for perioperative use. Anesthesiology. 1994 Mar;80(3):671-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00026.

    PMID: 8141463BACKGROUND
  • Bieberich MT, Van Duren AP. Thermal control and design considerations for a high-performance fluid warmer. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2003 Mar-Apr;37(2):103-12. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205(2003)37[103:TCADCF]2.0.CO;2.

    PMID: 12677748BACKGROUND
  • Patel N, Smith CE, Pinchak AC, Hagen JF. Prospective, randomized comparison of the Flotem Iie and Hotline fluid warmers in anesthetized adults. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Jun;8(4):307-16. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00040-2.

    PMID: 8695135BACKGROUND
  • Presson RG Jr, Bezruczko AP, Hillier SC, McNiece WL. Evaluation of a new fluid warmer effective at low to moderate flow rates. Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):974-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199305000-00023.

    PMID: 8489069BACKGROUND
  • Faries G, Johnston C, Pruitt KM, Plouff RT. Temperature relationship to distance and flow rate of warmed i.v. fluids. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Nov;20(11):1198-200. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81470-2.

    PMID: 1952305BACKGROUND
  • Adriani MB, Moriber N. Preoperative forced-air warming combined with intraoperative warming versus intraoperative warming alone in the prevention of hypothermia during gynecologic surgery. AANA J. 2013 Dec;81(6):446-51.

    PMID: 24597006BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypothermia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Body Temperature ChangesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Warunee Boayam, NS

    Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2016

First Posted

December 13, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations