40% Orally Administered Dextrose Gel is More Effective Than 25% Dextrose
40%D-N-PP
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safe of 40% Dextrose oral administration on blood glucose concentration and to reducing of pain before painful procedures on healthy term neonate 72 hours aged.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2016
CompletedDecember 6, 2016
November 1, 2016
9 months
November 16, 2016
December 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain reactivity changes after orally administered 0.5 ml/ kg body 40% dextrose gel or 25% dextrose as procedural pain relief in term neonates requiring a routine heel stick 72 hours after birth.
Pain reactivity changes were assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-revised (PIPP-R scale) which is composed of three behavioral, two physiological and two contextual pain indicators. Five measurements were undertaken during one routine heel stick which took place 72 hours after birth, on the bed side and coded through direct observation during 15 seconds at 5 different time points: 1. t0: before the heel lance (= baseline 30 minutes without stimuli before heel stick); 2. t1: at the end of the heel lance (after the ending of the squeezing of the heel and successful collection of blood drops); 3. t2: at 1 minute recovery time; 4. t3: at 2 minutes recovery time; 5. t4: at 5' minutes recovery time.
one routine heel stick 72 hours after birth
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Blood glucose levels changes after orally administered 0.5 ml/kg body 40% dextrose gel or 25% dextrose as procedural pain relief in term neonates requiring a routine heel stick 72 hours after birth.
one routine heel stick 72 hours after birth and at 30 minutes after orally 0.5 ml/kg body 40% dextrose gel or 25% dextrose
Study Arms (2)
Dextrose gel 40%
EXPERIMENTALbefore heel lance, 2 ml oral dextrose gel 40% was administered, and pain related intensity was evaluated with premature infant pain profile scale
Dextrose gel 25%
ACTIVE COMPARATORbefore heel lance, 2ml oral dextrose gel 25% was administered, and pain related intensity was evaluated with premature infant pain profile scale
Interventions
before heel lance, 2ml oral dextrose gel 25%or 40% was administered, and pain related intensity was evaluated with premature infant pain profile scale
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- were born at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation were
- APGAR score of ≥ 7 five minutes after birth
- had a postnatal age of ≥ 72 hours
- were breastfed (but not 30' prior to the testing HS)
- were undergoing a routine heel stick for metabolic screening between the third and fifth postnatal day
You may not qualify if:
- any kind of medical instabilities needing a transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
- severe intrapartum asphyxia defined as a 5' Apgar score less than 3
- parenteral nutrition and the presence of neurological symptoms
- congenital anomalies
- other conditions requiring treatment for hypo- or hyperglycemia
- those in which the heel lance procedure failed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tirgu Mures
TĂ¢rgu MureÅŸ, Romania
Related Publications (23)
Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S, Saizou C, Lapillonne A, Granier M, Durand P, Lenclen R, Coursol A, Hubert P, de Saint Blanquat L, Boelle PY, Annequin D, Cimerman P, Anand KJ, Breart G. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008 Jul 2;300(1):60-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60.
PMID: 18594041BACKGROUNDStevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio A, Barwick M, Latimer M, Scott SD, Rashotte J, Campbell F, Finley GA; CIHR Team in Children's Pain. Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):E403-10. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101341. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
PMID: 21464171BACKGROUNDCignacco E, Hamers JP, van Lingen RA, Zimmermann LJ, Muller R, Gessler P, Nelle M. Pain relief in ventilated preterms during endotracheal suctioning: a randomized controlled trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Nov 1;138(43-44):635-45. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12288.
PMID: 19005869BACKGROUNDRoofthooft DW, Simons SH, Anand KJ, Tibboel D, van Dijk M. Eight years later, are we still hurting newborn infants? Neonatology. 2014;105(3):218-26. doi: 10.1159/000357207. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
PMID: 24503902BACKGROUNDAnand KJ, Scalzo FM. Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Biol Neonate. 2000 Feb;77(2):69-82. doi: 10.1159/000014197.
PMID: 10657682BACKGROUNDAnand KJ. Pain, plasticity, and premature birth: a prescription for permanent suffering? Nat Med. 2000 Sep;6(9):971-3. doi: 10.1038/79658. No abstract available.
PMID: 10973310BACKGROUNDHarrison D, Yamada J, Stevens B. Strategies for the prevention and management of neonatal and infant pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010 Apr;14(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0091-0.
PMID: 20425200BACKGROUNDWilkinson DJ, Savulescu J, Slater R. Sugaring the pill: ethics and uncertainties in the use of sucrose for newborn infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Jul 1;166(7):629-33. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.352.
PMID: 22751876BACKGROUNDStevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD001069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub3.
PMID: 20091512BACKGROUNDCOMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN and SECTION ON ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE. Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20154271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4271. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 26810788BACKGROUNDHarrison D, Beggs S, Stevens B. Sucrose for procedural pain management in infants. Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):918-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3848. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
PMID: 23045554BACKGROUNDBueno M, Yamada J, Harrison D, Khan S, Ohlsson A, Adams-Webber T, Beyene J, Stevens B. A systematic review and meta-analyses of nonsucrose sweet solutions for pain relief in neonates. Pain Res Manag. 2013 May-Jun;18(3):153-61. doi: 10.1155/2013/956549.
PMID: 23748256BACKGROUNDHarrison D, Bueno M, Yamada J, Adams-Webber T, Stevens B. Analgesic effects of sweet-tasting solutions for infants: current state of equipoise. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):894-902. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1593. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
PMID: 20937658BACKGROUNDStevens B, Yamada J, Beyene J, Gibbins S, Petryshen P, Stinson J, Narciso J. Consistent management of repeated procedural pain with sucrose in preterm neonates: Is it effective and safe for repeated use over time? Clin J Pain. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):543-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000149802.46864.e2.
PMID: 16215340BACKGROUNDLefrak L, Burch K, Caravantes R, Knoerlein K, DeNolf N, Duncan J, Hampton F, Johnston C, Lockey D, Martin-Walters C, McLendon D, Porter M, Richardson C, Robinson C, Toczylowski K. Sucrose analgesia: identifying potentially better practices. Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118 Suppl 2:S197-202. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0913R.
PMID: 17079623BACKGROUNDGaspardo CM, Miyase CI, Chimello JT, Martinez FE, Linhares MBM. Is pain relief equally efficacious and free of side effects with repeated doses of oral sucrose in preterm neonates? Pain. 2008 Jul;137(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.032. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
PMID: 17854995BACKGROUNDJohnston CC, Filion F, Snider L, Limperopoulos C, Majnemer A, Pelausa E, Cake H, Stone S, Sherrard A, Boyer K. How much sucrose is too much sucrose? Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):226. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3001. No abstract available.
PMID: 17200300BACKGROUNDBellieni CV, Stazzoni G, Tei M, Alagna MG, Iacoponi F, Cornacchione S, Bertrando S, Buonocore G. How painful is a heelprick or a venipuncture in a newborn? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(2):202-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.992334. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
PMID: 25534000BACKGROUNDCignacco E, Hamers JP, Stoffel L, van Lingen RA, Schutz N, Muller R, Zimmermann LJ, Nelle M. Routine procedures in NICUs: factors influencing pain assessment and ranking by pain intensity. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Aug 23;138(33-34):484-91. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12147.
PMID: 18726734BACKGROUNDCodipietro L, Ceccarelli M, Ponzone A. Breastfeeding or oral sucrose solution in term neonates receiving heel lance: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):e716-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0221.
PMID: 18762508BACKGROUNDSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
PMID: 20332509BACKGROUNDGibbins S, Stevens BJ, Yamada J, Dionne K, Campbell-Yeo M, Lee G, Caddell K, Johnston C, Taddio A. Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Early Hum Dev. 2014 Apr;90(4):189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
PMID: 24491511BACKGROUNDBallantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999 Dec;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006.
PMID: 10617258BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
LAURA MIHAELA SUCIU, MD,PhD
University of Targu Mures, Romania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2016
First Posted
December 6, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share