Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis for Chronic Abdominal Pain Revisited
1 other identifier
observational
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic abdominal and pelvic pain is a common complaint following peritoneal surgery, affecting 20-40% of patients. Adhesions account for 60% of chronic postoperative pain cases, suggesting that adhesiolysis can play an important role in the management of such pain. Despite initial promising results regarding the effect of adhesiolysis on post-operative pain, implementation of the procedure has been challenging. The major problems associated with adhesiolysis for pain are recurrence of pain, need for invasive diagnosis with high rates of 'negative' laparoscopies, and inadvertent bowel injury during surgery. However, diagnosis and treatment of adhesions may be improved through the use of novel cine-MRI techniques, and with application of anti-adhesion barriers following adhesiolysis. In this study the investigators evaluate a new practice-based approach to the problem of chronic post-operative pain caused by adhesions. This practice-based approach includes use of a novel imaging technique for adhesions (cine-MRI) and shared decision making. Cine-MRI holds promise to diagnose and map adhesions. Thus patients with no adhesions, or high risk for bowel injury, can be waived from surgical treatment. By using anti-adhesion barriers the investigators attempt to prevent adhesion reformation and improve long-term outcomes of adhesiolysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedMay 6, 2019
November 1, 2016
1.9 years
November 23, 2016
May 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain
measured by a verbal rating pain change scale (VRCS)
long-term >6 months to 3 years following surgery or cineMRI
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Current pain
long-term >6 months to 3 years following surgery or cineMRI
Frequency of pain
long-term >6 months to 3 years following surgery or cineMRI
Daily discomfort
long-term >6 months to 3 years following surgery or cineMRI
Healthcare utilization
long-term >6 months to 3 years following surgery or cineMRI
Complications of surgery/ adhesiolysis
Peri-operative (up to 30 days after adhesiolysis)
Study Arms (3)
Group 1: adhesiolysis
Group 1 (the operative group) consisted of all patients who underwent laparoscopy and/or laparotomy. Typically patients had positive cine-MRI. A few patients with inconclusive cine-MRI who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy are also included in this group. Patients with no adhesions found during operation remain in group 1, because analysis is performed on intention-to-treat basis.
Group 2: Adhesions, conservative
Patients with evidence of adhesions based on cine-MRI who did not undergo laparoscopy or laparotomy.
Group 3: No adhesions
Patients in whom no evidence of adhesions was found on cine-MRI, and who did not undergo laparoscopy or laparotomy .
Interventions
Diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy with lysis of adhesions.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of the department of surgery for chronic postoperative pain who underwent a cine-MRI are screened for eligibility.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Pain exists for at least 6 months postoperatively
You may not qualify if:
- \- Cine-MRI not performed for chronic pain (e.g. recurrent pain with episodes of bowel obstructions)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Rijnstate Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, Gelderland, 6800TA, Netherlands
Related Publications (6)
ten Broek RP, Bakkum EA, Laarhoven CJ, van Goor H. Epidemiology and Prevention of Postsurgical Adhesions Revisited. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001286.
PMID: 26135678BACKGROUNDTen Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):48-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
PMID: 24075279BACKGROUNDGerner-Rasmussen J, Burcharth J, Gogenur I. The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jul;400(5):567-76. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1316-9. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
PMID: 26088873BACKGROUNDSwank DJ, Swank-Bordewijk SC, Hop WC, van Erp WF, Janssen IM, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet. 2003 Apr 12;361(9365):1247-51. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12979-0.
PMID: 12699951BACKGROUNDCheong YC, Reading I, Bailey S, Sadek K, Ledger W, Li TC. Should women with chronic pelvic pain have adhesiolysis? BMC Womens Health. 2014 Mar 4;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-36.
PMID: 24588989BACKGROUNDvan den Beukel BAW, Stommel MWJ, van Leuven S, Strik C, IJsseldijk MA, Joosten F, van Goor H, Ten Broek RPG. A Shared Decision Approach to Chronic Abdominal Pain Based on Cine-MRI: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;113(8):1229-1237. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0158-9. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
PMID: 29946174RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harry van Goor, MD, PhD
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2016
First Posted
December 6, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-11