CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness
COGITATE
A Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing the Effect of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Monitoring in the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
60
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Despite improvements in management, mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains 25% and only 40% of patients survive without major handicap. Medical/surgical interventions aim to maintain adequate brain perfusion, which is critically dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP); calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). Current guidelines aim for a CPP above 50 mmHg, based on population means. However, this 'one size fits all' approach is flawed, because the relation between CPP and brain perfusion varies between individuals. Further, this approach takes no account of autoregulation, a key protective mechanism that maintains cerebral perfusion despite CPP fluctuations. Autoregulation is variably preserved following TBI, and there are large between patient variances in the 'optimal' CPP (CPPopt) at which autoregulation operates best. Individual CPPopt can be retrieved automatically by plotting autoregulation data against the CPP over a certain time window. The investigators have shown that maintenance of CPP close to CPPopt is associated with improved outcomes. These data pose the hypothesis that optimisation of management in individuals may be achieved by using the zone of optimal autoregulation as a basis for defining individualised CPP targets. The investigators propose, together with collaborators in the CPPopt study group (Maastricht, Cambridge, Leuven and Aachen) to set up a pilot (multicenter) feasibility study to develop a protocol for a definitive outcome randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study aims to develop protocols for CPPopt guided critical care, and show that they maintain patients closer to their optimum perfusion levels than standard protocols which keep above a population CPP threshold of 60 mmHg. Hence, the main objective is to offer clinicians monitoring and therapy algorithms that achieve individualized optimal CPPopt targets and potentially improve TBI outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2020
CompletedSeptember 30, 2020
September 1, 2020
2 years
November 23, 2016
September 29, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of monitoring time with measured CPP within 5 mmHg of calculated CPPopt
Main feasible endpoint: In pilot studies, we showed that, on average, patients spent a mean (+SD) of 30% ( 8%) of their monitored time with measured CPP within 5 mmHg of CPPopt. The study will be powered to target an increase in this metric to 50% of monitored time.
First 5 days during intensive care unit admission
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Intensity Level (TIL) score
First 5 days during intensive care unit admission
Study Arms (2)
CPPopt intervention group
EXPERIMENTALPatients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, except for CPP where the CPPopt is targeted.
CPP control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines with CPP between 60 and 70 mmHg. CPPopt information is recorded but hidden for the treating clinicians.
Interventions
For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any adult severe TBI patient requiring multimodality monitoring and ICP-directed therapy for at least 24 hrs on the assessment of the recruiting team.
- Start randomization within 24 hrs after ICU admission.
- Deferred informed consent or deferred proxy assent from relatives/legal representative (consultee).
- Exception for enrolling a patient past the 24 hour window: A patient who is admitted to the hospital and later experiences neuro-worsening that is not due to a systemic insult, (e.g. myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolus, systemic hemorrhage) but due to a presumptive intracranial cause, and subsequently requires an ICP monitor, may be screened for enrolment. Consent, randomization, and monitor placement must be done within 48 hours from injury in order for the patient to qualify.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years old.
- Known pregnancy.
- Moribund at presentation (e.g. bilaterally absent pupillary responses)
- Patients with primary decompressive craniectomy.
- Patients already enrolled in \> 1 other research studies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Academic Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
The Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Related Publications (5)
Aries MJ, Wesselink R, Elting JW, Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Ercole A, Maurits NM, Smielewski P. Enhanced Visualization of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Over Time to Support Clinical Decision Making. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e996-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001816.
PMID: 27270178RESULTZuercher P, Groen JL, Aries MJ, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI, Ercole A, Menon DK. Reliability and Validity of the Therapy Intensity Level Scale: Analysis of Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Approach to Assess Management of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct 1;33(19):1768-1774. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4266. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
PMID: 26866876RESULTDonnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Feb;15(2):169-85. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.996552.
PMID: 25614952RESULTAries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, Brady KM, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Smielewski P. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2456-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514eb6.
PMID: 22622398RESULTBeqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C, Czosnyka M, Cabeleira MT, Tas J, Donnelly J, Outtrim JG, Hutchinson P, Menon D, Meyfroidt G, Depreitere B, Aries MJ, Ercole A. Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.
PMID: 31542757DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Paul Roekaerts, professor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2016
First Posted
December 5, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 27, 2020
Study Completion
February 27, 2020
Last Updated
September 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09