NCT02982122

Brief Summary

Despite improvements in management, mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains 25% and only 40% of patients survive without major handicap. Medical/surgical interventions aim to maintain adequate brain perfusion, which is critically dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP); calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). Current guidelines aim for a CPP above 50 mmHg, based on population means. However, this 'one size fits all' approach is flawed, because the relation between CPP and brain perfusion varies between individuals. Further, this approach takes no account of autoregulation, a key protective mechanism that maintains cerebral perfusion despite CPP fluctuations. Autoregulation is variably preserved following TBI, and there are large between patient variances in the 'optimal' CPP (CPPopt) at which autoregulation operates best. Individual CPPopt can be retrieved automatically by plotting autoregulation data against the CPP over a certain time window. The investigators have shown that maintenance of CPP close to CPPopt is associated with improved outcomes. These data pose the hypothesis that optimisation of management in individuals may be achieved by using the zone of optimal autoregulation as a basis for defining individualised CPP targets. The investigators propose, together with collaborators in the CPPopt study group (Maastricht, Cambridge, Leuven and Aachen) to set up a pilot (multicenter) feasibility study to develop a protocol for a definitive outcome randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study aims to develop protocols for CPPopt guided critical care, and show that they maintain patients closer to their optimum perfusion levels than standard protocols which keep above a population CPP threshold of 60 mmHg. Hence, the main objective is to offer clinicians monitoring and therapy algorithms that achieve individualized optimal CPPopt targets and potentially improve TBI outcome.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 23, 2016

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 30, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 23, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of monitoring time with measured CPP within 5 mmHg of calculated CPPopt

    Main feasible endpoint: In pilot studies, we showed that, on average, patients spent a mean (+SD) of 30% ( 8%) of their monitored time with measured CPP within 5 mmHg of CPPopt. The study will be powered to target an increase in this metric to 50% of monitored time.

    First 5 days during intensive care unit admission

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment Intensity Level (TIL) score

    First 5 days during intensive care unit admission

Study Arms (2)

CPPopt intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, except for CPP where the CPPopt is targeted.

Other: For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

CPP control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines with CPP between 60 and 70 mmHg. CPPopt information is recorded but hidden for the treating clinicians.

Other: For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

Interventions

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

CPP control groupCPPopt intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Any adult severe TBI patient requiring multimodality monitoring and ICP-directed therapy for at least 24 hrs on the assessment of the recruiting team.
  • Start randomization within 24 hrs after ICU admission.
  • Deferred informed consent or deferred proxy assent from relatives/legal representative (consultee).
  • Exception for enrolling a patient past the 24 hour window: A patient who is admitted to the hospital and later experiences neuro-worsening that is not due to a systemic insult, (e.g. myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolus, systemic hemorrhage) but due to a presumptive intracranial cause, and subsequently requires an ICP monitor, may be screened for enrolment. Consent, randomization, and monitor placement must be done within 48 hours from injury in order for the patient to qualify.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients \< 18 years old.
  • Known pregnancy.
  • Moribund at presentation (e.g. bilaterally absent pupillary responses)
  • Patients with primary decompressive craniectomy.
  • Patients already enrolled in \> 1 other research studies.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Academic Hospital Leuven

Leuven, Belgium

Location

The Addenbrooke's Hospital

Cambridge, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Aries MJ, Wesselink R, Elting JW, Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Ercole A, Maurits NM, Smielewski P. Enhanced Visualization of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Over Time to Support Clinical Decision Making. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e996-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001816.

  • Zuercher P, Groen JL, Aries MJ, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI, Ercole A, Menon DK. Reliability and Validity of the Therapy Intensity Level Scale: Analysis of Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Approach to Assess Management of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct 1;33(19):1768-1774. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4266. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

  • Donnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Feb;15(2):169-85. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.996552.

  • Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, Brady KM, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Smielewski P. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2456-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514eb6.

  • Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C, Czosnyka M, Cabeleira MT, Tas J, Donnelly J, Outtrim JG, Hutchinson P, Menon D, Meyfroidt G, Depreitere B, Aries MJ, Ercole A. Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Interventions

Vasoconstrictor Agents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular AgentsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and Uses

Study Officials

  • Paul Roekaerts, professor

    Maastricht University Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2016

First Posted

December 5, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion

February 27, 2020

Study Completion

February 27, 2020

Last Updated

September 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations