Microtransplantation Versus Auto-SCT in ≥PR Multiple Myeloma Patients
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial of Microtransplantation Versus Auto-SCT in ≥PR Multiple Myeloma Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of microtransplantation and autologous transplantation in the treatment of ≥PR multiple myeloma patients, 2-year PFS and OS were also been observed. To identify the role of microtransplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedDecember 16, 2016
December 1, 2016
2.9 years
November 30, 2016
December 15, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
progression-free survival
2 years
overall survival
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
rate of complete remission
2 year
minimal residual disease
2 year
hematopoietic recovery
3 month
infection
3 month
GVHD
1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Micro-SCT
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients treated with microtransplantation. \[VMD chemotherapy(bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d1,4,8,11; melphalan 60mg/m2 d1; dexamethasone 20mg d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12) + low dose allogeneic stem cell transplantation\]×4cycles; \[PTD chemotherapy(bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d1,4,8,11; thalidomide 100mg/d, dexamethasone 20mg d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12)\]×1cycle; then maintenance therapy with thalidomide 100mg/d. microtransplantation = \[VMD regimen chemotherapy+ low dose allogeneic stem cell transplantation\]×4cycles
Auto-SCT
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients treated with Auto-SCT. conditioning with Mel+Vel regimen (melphalan 200mg/m2 d-2, bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d-6,-3,+1,+4) + autogeneic stem cell transplantation; \[PTD chemotherapy(bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 d1,4,8,11; thalidomide 100mg/d, dexamethasone 20mg d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12)\]×4cycle; then maintenance therapy with thalidomide 100mg/d.
Interventions
conditioning with chemotherapy \[VMD regimen(bortezomib, melphalan, dexamethasone) or Mel+Vel regimen(melphalan, bortezomib)\], then stem cell transfusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis MM compliance with IMWG diagnostic criteria(2014)
- induction therapy with 4 cycles PCD/PAD regimen, achieve ≥PR
- KPS ≥60,ECOG≤2 4)Age 18-65,eligible for SCT 5)Heart function \< II level (NYHA standard) and ejection fraction \> 50% -
You may not qualify if:
- KPS\<60
- Allergy to bortezomib,epirubicin, or drug ingredients
- Severe hepatitis and organ dysfunction: a serious infection has not been controlled; cardiac ejection fraction \<50%, serum bilirubin \>3mg/dl, severe abnormal results of liver function test (AST is greater than 3 times the upper limit), severe renal injury; central nervous system disorders, uncontrolled mental illness
- With more than 2 bortezomib associated with peripheral neuropathy or neuralgia patients
- Patients with active stage of the herpes zoster
- Women in pregnancy or lactation
- MM with AL or EM plasma cell tumor
- The patient refused to accept the above treatment and signature
- Donor does not meet the requirements: including HIV positive, active hepatitis B, bone marrow disease, donor refused to provide hematopoietic stem cells and do not agree to sign.
- Epirubicin / other anthracyclines previously accumulated more than 240mg/m2 -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chen Wenminglead
- 307 Hospital of PLAcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100020, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wenming Chen, doctor
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2016
First Posted
December 5, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share