NCT02976948

Brief Summary

Main objective: To compare the efficacy of a new strategy of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) versus a classical Sanger strategy, for the diagnosis of patients referred to the laboratory for suspected systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAID). Secondary objectives:

  • Compare after 6 months the impact of these strategies on the establishment of an effective treatment SAID following genetic result.
  • Compare the distribution of different forms of SAID found with each genetic diagnostic strategies (NGS vs classic method).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
299

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 31, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2016

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

September 2, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of genetically ascertained patients using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) vs Sanger

    At time of report issue up to two years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Date of introduction of relevant treatment

    6 months after report issue

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Months - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients referred to the laboratory for suspected Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases (SAID)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with prerequisites established jointly by the reference centers:
  • At least 3 unexplained inflammatory access
  • Elevated C Reactive Protein
  • Age of symtoms less than 30 years and validated by a physician CeréMAI (Centre de référence des maladies autoinflamatoires)

You may not qualify if:

  • Other inflammatory disease:
  • intercurrent infection
  • cancer
  • autoimmune disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

university Hospital Montpellier

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Rama M, Mura T, Kone-Paut I, Boursier G, Aouinti S, Touitou I, Sarrabay G. Is gene panel sequencing more efficient than clinical-based gene sequencing to diagnose autoinflammatory diseases? A randomized study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Jan;203(1):105-114. doi: 10.1111/cei.13511. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Patients with prerequisites established jointly by the reference centers . At least 3 unexplained inflammatory access elevated CRP (C reactive protein)

Study Officials

  • Guillaume SARRABAY, md

    University Hospital, Montpellier

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2016

First Posted

November 30, 2016

Study Start

July 31, 2015

Primary Completion

July 31, 2019

Study Completion

March 31, 2020

Last Updated

December 30, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Locations