Study Stopped
Inclusion of the last patient
Evaluation of a New Sequencing Strategy in Autoinflammatory Siseases (BIOSAID)
BIOSAID
1 other identifier
observational
299
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Main objective: To compare the efficacy of a new strategy of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) versus a classical Sanger strategy, for the diagnosis of patients referred to the laboratory for suspected systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAID). Secondary objectives:
- Compare after 6 months the impact of these strategies on the establishment of an effective treatment SAID following genetic result.
- Compare the distribution of different forms of SAID found with each genetic diagnostic strategies (NGS vs classic method).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2020
CompletedDecember 30, 2021
December 1, 2021
4 years
September 2, 2016
December 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of genetically ascertained patients using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) vs Sanger
At time of report issue up to two years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Date of introduction of relevant treatment
6 months after report issue
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients referred to the laboratory for suspected Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases (SAID)
You may qualify if:
- Patients with prerequisites established jointly by the reference centers:
- At least 3 unexplained inflammatory access
- Elevated C Reactive Protein
- Age of symtoms less than 30 years and validated by a physician CeréMAI (Centre de référence des maladies autoinflamatoires)
You may not qualify if:
- Other inflammatory disease:
- intercurrent infection
- cancer
- autoimmune disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
university Hospital Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Related Publications (1)
Rama M, Mura T, Kone-Paut I, Boursier G, Aouinti S, Touitou I, Sarrabay G. Is gene panel sequencing more efficient than clinical-based gene sequencing to diagnose autoinflammatory diseases? A randomized study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Jan;203(1):105-114. doi: 10.1111/cei.13511. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
PMID: 32909274DERIVED
Biospecimen
Patients with prerequisites established jointly by the reference centers . At least 3 unexplained inflammatory access elevated CRP (C reactive protein)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillaume SARRABAY, md
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2016
First Posted
November 30, 2016
Study Start
July 31, 2015
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
March 31, 2020
Last Updated
December 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12